Image Copyright
Intellectual property laws are the subject of much debate. Indeed, some people feel as if the ability to use another person's photo or likeness without payment or other remuneration should be allowed and free while the law itself basically bans such a practice unless such uninhibited usage is granted in advance. As with most things, there is a middle ground between the two that could and should be sought but the middle ground is going to favor the intellectually property proponents much more than the opponents. While the intellectual property people have valid gripes to some degree, there is a need for intellectual property law and the author of this report will offer specific examples of why this needs to be the case.
Analysis
A major linchpin of the argument for the free and unblocked use of photos by people other than those that are authorized or that took the picture is that copying a photo from an online source does not "hurt' the person who took the photo because a copy can be made without hurting the original. Much the same argument is made in other realms of intellectual property law such as with software, music, video, movies and television shows. However, the general argument to quash that is that there is money and time invested into the making and publishing of those works of art or
Another reason that photographs should not be used without compensation and permission is because those pictures commonly have people in them and the use of those likenesses cannot and should not be used without limit by anyone who happens to come across them. Beyond that, there are often contracts in place by the people being snapped (or their representatives) so as to limit how those pictures are used. Indeed, Taylor Swift caught some heat for the contracts that her people put in place for her images but the practice is fairly common in the industry (Kenneally, 2015).
As noted before, some people on the pro-intellectual property side take things too far. For example, there have been cameras destroyed and people assaulted for the snapping of pictures in a public setting. Of course, if the rules about pictures apply to the photographers and such, the same should hold true for pictures taken in a public setting. Even so, there are lines drawn and…
Johnson reports that "in 1998, the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA)1 severely limited the use of copyrighted materials in distance learning. In 2002, the Technology, Education, and Copy- right Harmonization Act (TEACH Act) relaxed these restrictions under specific conditions. These two laws significantly changed the way educators could use copyrighted material in the digital class- room." (Johnson, p. 66) In the section hereafter, the research considers the implications of this
In conclusion, I believe that the anti-circumvention provision is important since it makes sense to prevent unauthorized uses of the intellectual works of the owner who have put so much time and efforts in producing the work. If a person had a legitimate fair use reason for accessing a work, then nothing in the provision would prevent him or her from doing so. This provision is also important since it offers the
Pharmaceutical Companies, Intellectual Property, and the Global AIDS Epidemic For this case study, six questions had been asked. The first one is: Should pharmaceutical companies distribute drugs at low cost in third world countries? What are the pros and cons of such an approach? The second one is: What are the principal arguments of pharma companies who oppose making exception to IPR laws for developing countries? What are the arguments by
Research: As we can see in the preliminary discussion above, in the face of the extension of copyright and patent-heavy cultures from western nations to global trade relationships, the very conflict between capitalism and social progressivism is implicated. Indeed, many socially conscious global economic groups are protesting international intellectual property laws that they say are burdensome to developing economies and which favor the sense of entitlement and ownership typically reserved for
Ethics Issues on Intellectual Property in E-Business This paper briefly outlines the basics of intellectual property. It also describes the importance of intellectual property in business and then provides a detailed discussion on e-business and intellectual property. The paper will deal with a few cases of infringement to illustrate how intellectual property is important in e-business. Intellectual property is very important to any business. Intellectual property rights including patents and copyrights have
As a result, this protection was removed to increase the supply and ensure that the public has access to affordable drugs. ("Pharmaceutical Companies," n.d., pp. 97-99) Some of the negative implications of this decision are that there could be large amounts of generic drugs produced. This is because the various protections were removed to the point, that a number of players could begin manufacturing the medication. Over the course of
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now