Verified Document

Implications Of Kentucky V. King Essay

Kentucky v. King Case: Kentucky v. King (2011)

Facts: In Lexington, Kentucky the police were following someone who they believed was a known crack dealer into an apartment complex. Outside of the apartment door, they smelled marijuana smoke. The officers knocked on the door and announced their presence. After this occurred, they heard the people inside moving around. This sounded like they were in the process of trying to destroy evidence. The police subsequently, stated their intention to enter the apartment and kicked in the door. When they entered the apartment, they seen other people and the drugs in plain sight. After conducting a protective sweep, they found even more drugs and paraphernalia. During the trial, the defendants tried to have the evidence sequestered under the case precedent established by under Mapp v. Ohio. It states that when there is the improper search of a private residence, any evidence collected against the suspects is automatically thrown out under the poisonous tree doctrine. In the case, the defendants felt that since the police did not have a search warrant, the search was illegal. This meant they should not be able to use any evidence against them, based upon the fact that they were perusing someone else and arrested others who were not under investigation. Instead, they were in the wrong place at the wrong time. These individuals were convicted and appealed the decision to Circuit Court. They found that the police acted properly based upon the fact that exigent circumstances required them to move quickly in order to prevent...

The Kentucky Supreme Court reversed the decision. This is because the police should have known that the defendants would have engaged in these actions as they were surprised by their presence. They felt that this was a natural reaction, when law enforcement comes knocking and forces their way in.
Issue: The U.S. Supreme Court is looking at when exigent circumstances apply and what standards must be utilized in these kinds of circumstances.

Holding: In an 8 to 1 decision, the court found that the actions taken by the police were legal. This is because they did not create the exigent circumstances. Instead, it was the crack dealer who allowed this to occur, when he went inside the apartment in order to evade them. This meant that they could use this as justification for entering the residence.

Majority Reasoning: (Alito) The majority of the Justices had several different reasons for supporting their decision. The most notable include: when the exigent rule applies and how it is interpreted in conjunction with the Fourth Amendment.

Rule A: The exigent rule applies, as the court determined that all searches and seizures must be reasonable. This based upon previous case precedent established under Brigham City v. Stuart and Mincey v. Arizona. Brigham City v. Stuart found that warrantless searches are legal when there is the possibility that evidence could be destroyed and the police need to act quickly to prevent this (i.e. exigent circumstance). Mincey v. Arizona confirmed the decision by illustrating the significance of this doctrine, in order to preserve evidence during the course of conducting an investigation. This takes place, with law enforcement feeling that there is the likelihood evidence will be destroyed during the process of obtaining a warrant to search the premise. In these circumstances, they have the right to conduct a warrantless raid in order to achieve these objectives. The Supreme Court found that the circumstances in Kentucky v. King allowed them to kick in the door and search the premise as reasonable circumstances exist.

Rule…

Sources used in this document:
References

Kentucky v. King, Bloomberg Law, 2011, http://www2.bloomberglaw.com/public/desktop/document/Kentucky_v_King_131_S_Ct_1849_179_L_Ed_2d_865_2011_Court_Opinion

Kentucky v. King, Cornell Law, 2011, http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/09-1272.ZS.html

Kentucky v. King, Bloomberg Law, 2011, http://www2.bloomberglaw.com/public/desktop/document/Kentucky_v_King_131_S_Ct_1849_179_L_Ed_2d_865_2011_Court_Opinion

Kentucky v. King, Bloomberg Law, 2011, http://www2.bloomberglaw.com/public/desktop/document/Kentucky_v_King_131_S_Ct_1849_179_L_Ed_2d_865_2011_Court_Opinion
Kentucky v. King, Bloomberg Law, 2011, http://www2.bloomberglaw.com/public/desktop/document/Kentucky_v_King_131_S_Ct_1849_179_L_Ed_2d_865_2011_Court_Opinion
Kentucky v. King, Bloomberg Law, 2011, http://www2.bloomberglaw.com/public/desktop/document/Kentucky_v_King_131_S_Ct_1849_179_L_Ed_2d_865_2011_Court_Opinion
Kentucky v. King, Bloomberg Law, 2011, http://www2.bloomberglaw.com/public/desktop/document/Kentucky_v_King_131_S_Ct_1849_179_L_Ed_2d_865_2011_Court_Opinion
Kentucky v. King, Bloomberg Law, 2011, http://www2.bloomberglaw.com/public/desktop/document/Kentucky_v_King_131_S_Ct_1849_179_L_Ed_2d_865_2011_Court_Opinion
Kentucky v. King, Bloomberg Law, 2011, http://www2.bloomberglaw.com/public/desktop/document/Kentucky_v_King_131_S_Ct_1849_179_L_Ed_2d_865_2011_Court_Opinion
Kentucky v. King, Bloomberg Law, 2011, http://www2.bloomberglaw.com/public/desktop/document/Kentucky_v_King_131_S_Ct_1849_179_L_Ed_2d_865_2011_Court_Opinion
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Healthcare Organization and Finance
Words: 1455 Length: 4 Document Type: Research Paper

Healthcare Organization and Finance Scenario Medicare covers healthcare services such as surgeries, laboratory testing and doctor visits. It also covers supplies such as walkers and wheelchairs. These services and supplies must be considered as indispensable in the treatment of a certain disease or condition (King, 2009). Therefore, the expenses related to the walker that was prescribed to Mrs. Zwick after her discharge would be fully met in this section of the Medicare. Essentially,

Criminal Acts Offender Behavior
Words: 1616 Length: 5 Document Type: Research Paper

Criminality Offender Behavior With correctional populations at an all time high, the cost of maintaining the prison system has been breaking state budgets for years (Pew Center on the States, 2009). For example, the state of Kentucky was facing a $1.5 billion revenue shortfall in 2009 at the same time that it was being sued by its own counties for costs associated with jailing prison overflows. This growing fiscal crisis has

Learning Styles and Student Achievement
Words: 9900 Length: 35 Document Type: Term Paper

Students level of skills How students are relating to vocabulary usage Time segments in minutes Notes need help (more than 20% are unable to process) Students are spending more time working independently. Fewer students need assistance from teacher. A somewhat skilled (10-20% need some assistance from teacher) working independently (fewer than 10% need assistance from teacher Learning Styles used Time segments in minutes Notes Verbal/Linguistic Visual/Spatial Body/Kinesthetic Interpersonal Intrapersonal Musical Naturalistic Student Engagement Indicators - Make notes of overall impression of the lesson: Students Given Choices Give

Pepsico Roger Enrico Is Facing
Words: 517 Length: 2 Document Type: Term Paper

Enrico knew that, and therefore could rest assured that even when faced with a complete reorganization, his employees would accept the circumstances under which they would have to toil, and would, in the long run, excel! Pepsico had a reputation for making essential decisions quickly and Roger knew that in order to maintain, and enhance that reputation a consolidation would have to take place. Currently, some of the decisions that had

Juvenile Death Penalty Sentencing Is
Words: 1651 Length: 6 Document Type: Term Paper

" (Potter, 1999) Supreme Court finally strikes down juvenile executions On Mar. 1, 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down once and for all juvenile executions in the United States, abandoning nations such as Nigeria, Congo, China, Pakistan and others whose records of human rights abuse are staggering. The 5-4 decision reverses the death sentences of about 70 juvenile murderers and bars states from seeking to execute minors for future crimes. The executions, the

Realism and the End of
Words: 1070 Length: 3 Document Type: Seminar Paper

S.S.R. stands the fact that civil strife is less dangerous if it takes place on the losing side that it is on the winning side (p99). Realists and Their Critics Predictive failure: realism through structural realism failed to predict the fall of the U.S.S.R. And instead foresaw stability in the bipolar system. However, no theory considered the idea of the way in which the Cold War would end. Even so, theorists did

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now