¶ … Wet Foot Dry Foot Policy
History of Cuban Immigration
Opposition to wet foot dry foot
Fidel Castro
Haitian American Activist
Elian Gonzalez
Recent Haitian Immigrants
Human Right Advocates
immigration policy has long been the center of much debate. In recent months the treatment of Haitian immigrants has come into question. Many in the Haitian American community question why Cuban immigrants are granted asylum while Haitians and other immigrants are deported. The purpose of this discussion is to explore the immigration policy of wet foot dry foot and to determine why this policy is such a controversial topic.
Defining the wet foot dry foot policy
The wet foot dry foot policy was enacted in the late 90's and permitted under the 1966 Cuban adjustment act the policy allows an individual who flees Cuba the right to stay in the United States if there feet touch the shore or the soil. ("Wet Foot Dry Foot") The Clinton administration feared an influx of Cuban immigrant so the administration voted to continue the policy. ("Wet Foot Dry Foot")
Now Bush administration has decided to continue to implement the policy. ("Wet Foot Dry Foot")
The policy is believed to reduce the amount of Cuban immigrants that enter the country. As the article states, "The policy staunched the flow of rafters, but it added another layer of inconsistency to U.S. immigration policy." ("Wet Foot Dry Foot")
The wet foot dry foot policy dictates that if an individual does not reach shore they must prove that they will face persecution if they are returned to Cuba. ("Wet Foot Dry Foot") The policy was enacted in wake of the Cold War and the mounting displeasure that the American Government had towards Cuban dictator Fidel Castro.
Cuban immigrants are the only immigrant group that benefit from this policy. Supposedly, the reason for this is because Cubans are viewed as political exiles that are fleeing harsh dictatorships. Many believe that the policy is hypocritical because it grants citizenship to one group but not to others. Others believe that the law is needed for Cubans fleeing political persecution and poverty.
History of Cuban Immigration
According to an Agenda paper created by Max Castro of the University of Miami, "Historically, the average number of Cuban immigrants entering the United States from 1960 to 1962 and from 1965 to 1973 was significantly higher than the annual average during the last decade." (Castro)
Castro goes on to explain that the ratios of Dominican, Haitian and Jamaican immigrants exceeded the number of Cubans that entered the country during the 1990's. (Castro)
There are reasons why the influx of Cuban immigrants has decreased. Castro asserts that the, reason for limited Cuban migration is U.S. policy toward Cuban immigrants, which has moved, in fits and starts, from one of nearly unconditional acceptance of all Cubans fleeing the island to a more restrictive approach. The U.S.-Cuba immigration agreement of 1994 has succeeded in substantially normalizing the migration process, but the "wet-feet/dry-feet" policy represents a significant loophole that encourages unsafe, unregulated, and unauthorized migration often carried out by smugglers of human cargo and costly in human life."(Castro)
Opposition to Wet foot dry foot
There are many who believe that the wet foot dry foot policy should not exist. On the other hand, others oppose the fact that the policy has not been extended to include all immigrant groups. Still others believe that the policy violates human rights laws.
For the purposes of this discussion we will discuss the opposition of Fidel Castro and his government. We will also discuss why Haitian Americans oppose the fact that the policy has not been extended to Haitians. In addition we will explore why some feel that the policy violates human rights laws.
Fidel Castro
Chief among the opponents of this law is Fidel Castro. Castro believes that the current U.S. policy towards Cubans encourages people to risk their lives. In an article entitled "Castro Blasts U.S. Immigration Policy for Cubans" Fidel asserted that the policy was a "diabolical killing machine."(Fletcher)The article also state that the 1967 Cuban Adjustment Act encouraged illegal attempts by Cubans to leave the communist-ruled island by sea, whether in flimsy homemade boats and rafts or with the help of U.S.-based smugglers. This had lured many Cubans to death by drowning in the Florida Straits and was continuing to do so, he added. He was speaking at the end of a meeting of Cuba's Women's Federation. (Fletcher)
Cuba has often called its citizens to protest the American Immigration policy stating that it persuades Cubans to take huge risks with their lives. ("Cuba calls for protests denouncing U.S. immigration policy") In September of 2000 the Cuban government...
Immigration Policies Describe U.S. Immigration policies within a historical framework. The current policies of the United States toward immigration are much different when compared to the historical strategies of the country. As: work was bountiful, immigrants were entering the nation in droves, and the availability of jobs was suited to employ the masses of people. The reason why is because historically, immigration was encouraged. This is because, it was considered to a
Much of the difference in assimilation patterns between this group of Latins and previous European and Asian groups surrounds the restructuring of the American economy and the sheer volume of immigrants. Contemporary immigrants face a dichotomous situation: "either they maintain their cultural and communal distinctivness, thus selectively acculturating while keeping some distance from the mainstream, or they will be forced into the position of racial minorities, imposing great disadvantages
Another state in the U.S., Utah, after the law enforcement which was delayed by the Arizona court, this state has adopted another option regarding the immigration policy for the state. The governor of the state said that Utah is not a state where the illegal immigrants can move and have jobs without having the fear for being deported, this is how should be (MSNBC, 2010).The Utah has a different model
3, 5). Stromsta additionally offers that, due to their lack of even a high school education, many immigrants will never be able to substantially contribute to the tax pool (sec. 5). Since no immigration policy has yet even slowed the number of illegal immigrants (Beinart par. 1), the only way to resolve these economic issues is to stop illegal border crossings completely with a full-scale wall. A border wall is
Immigration Policy Immigration has always been an important part of America’s heritage. Its towns and cities are full of different cultures and peoples from around the world, pointing to the many different types of people who came to America seeking opportunity and a new home over the centuries. The early Spanish and French missionaries came in the 16th century seeking converts to Christianity. The Puritans and English followed. The Germans and
Two immigration policy moves and interventions that would be worth highlighting in this text are the Border Protection, Anti-terrorism, and Illegal Immigration Control Act of 2005 and the Trump Administration immigration policies. According to the Center for Immigration Studies (2017), the Border Protection, Anti-terrorism, and Illegal Immigration Control Act of 2005 “was limited to enforcement and was focused on both border and the interior.” In essence, the law was passed
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now