Verified Document

Human Experimentation With Human Subjects Raises A Term Paper

Human Experimentation Experimentation with human subjects raises a number of important moral implications. Modern protections for human subjects have their history in the Nuremberg Code, written for the Nuremberg Military Tribunal as a standard for judging the human experiments performed by the Nazis in WWII. The Declaration of Helsinki in 1964 further defined codes for human research, and the United States first implemented regulations for protecting human subjects as late as 1984 under the auspices of the Department of Health, Education and Welfare (DHEW). That same year the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research began work on the Belmont Report. The report, published in 1978, set out the key ethical principles of respect for persons, beneficence, and justice that now underlie legislation involving research that on human subjects (United States Department of Health & Human Services). Today, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) regulations at 45 CFR 46 govern human research (Office for Protection from Research Risks).

The lengthy history of such attempts to define codes of conduct for human research reflects the philosophic difficulties underlying such attempts. Human research brings into consideration a large number of moral issues, including the rights of the individual, the needs of larger society, economic benefits of research, and potential...

For example, consider a medical experiment designed to determine the effect of high dietary cholesterol on mortality. In a situation where researchers are allowed to manipulate cholesterol levels, some subjects would receive high levels of dietary cholesterol, while others received little dietary cholesterol. Given the known correlation between high cholesterol and cardiovascular disease, researchers would be directly placing the subjects given diets high in cholesterol at increased risk for heart disease and stroke. As such, this experiment would harm the physical health of some participants. Here, the moral issue of individual rights comes into play.
If we accept that all individuals have the basic rights of safety and self-determination, then the cholesterol experiment described above is clearly unethical. In damaging the physical health of some participants, the study clearly violates the basic rights of participants.

However, the violations of basic individual human rights must also be balanced against the potential good for all of society. Imagine a situation where a medical experiment would decisively show that a given treatment could cure a common form of cancer, but where subjects not given the treatment would have a high chance of…

Sources used in this document:
References

Office for Protection from Research Risks. 1997. Summary of Basic Protections for Human Subjects. December 23, 1997. 24 June 2004. http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/basics.htm

United States Department of Health & Human Services, The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP). Institutional Review Board Guidebook. 24 June 2004. http://ohrp.osophs.dhhs.gov/irb/irb_introduction.htm
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Human Cloning This Report Aims to Address
Words: 3276 Length: 10 Document Type: Term Paper

Human Cloning This report aims to address various issues and concerns regarding human cloning. "On Sunday morning, 23 February 1997, the world awoke to a technological advance that shook the foundations of biology and philosophy. On that day, we were introduced to Dolly, a 6-month-old lamb that had been cloned directly from a single cell taken from the breast tissue of an adult donor." (Brannigan, 10) But that was a sheep

Human Stem Cell Medical -
Words: 4660 Length: 17 Document Type: Term Paper

This bill was sent to the U.S. Senate and set for vote mirroring a bill previously passed by the House during the Summer of 2003 which failed to pass the Senate because of vehement disagreement that was even "within the parties over the prohibition of therapeutic cloning.(National Legislation Concerning Human and Reproductive Cloning, 2004; paraphrased) As of the date of the report on legislation eight U.S. states had passed

Unethical Experimentation Issues and Concerns
Words: 4124 Length: 15 Document Type: Term Paper

(Freyhofer 104) Globalizing clinical research has reportedly proven to be one solution for America's pharmaceutical paradox. Doctors prescribe more than 10 prescriptions for the average American each year. Only one person in 350, however, will submit themselves to be a participant in experimental drug testing. On the other side of the globe, however a profusion of under-treated, poor, physician-trusting patients who live in Latin America, Eastern Europe, and Southeast Asia

Against Animal Experimentation
Words: 2186 Length: 6 Document Type: Term Paper

Nineteenth century physiologist Claude Bernard first started practicing experimental medicine on animals. Bernard thought it was immoral to conduct laboratory experiments on humans, if these test were not proven first proven to be safe on animals (LaFollette and Shanks, 1994). Man, as the most intelligent species of the animal kingdom, is constantly discovering new and innovative ideas to improve his life style and the quality of life. A proof of

Human or Animal Behavior You
Words: 2750 Length: 7 Document Type: Essay

Also, the different moral patterns of between the genders, as analyzed by Gillian, remains controversial, as the inherently 'separate' moral system of men and women (to say nothing of psychologist's ability to define what constitutes adult morality at all) is part of the raging debate on how to create truly fair, gender-neutral tests and classroom environments. In terms of usefulness on a personal level, the different ways of dealing

Animal Rights - Animal Experimentation
Words: 881 Length: 3 Document Type: Thesis

The Moral Equation: Observations of animals, whether in the wild, in captivity, or in experimental cages reveal undeniable evidence that they perceive physical pain and discomfort as well as pain as acutely as we do (Tangley 2000). Anecdotal evidence of numerous well documented instances seems to suggest that many animals also experience emotions such as grief from of loss of companionship (Moussaieff-Masson 1995). Not uncommonly, it is scientists and medical researchers themselves

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now