Paper Example Doctorate 501 words

Hi-Ho Yo Case Hi-Ho Yo Inc. Customizes

Last reviewed: March 28, 2012 ~3 min read

Hi-Ho Yo Case

Hi-Ho Yo Inc. customizes logos for you yo's. Orders in are increasing, resulting in rising volume for the plant and production staff. We must evaluate several rules that will help us determine which method is best for inventory schedules. Job sequencing and inventory turns are an important part of any organizational success plan. Job processing and due dates affect all aspects of the organization: Production, Sales, Customer Service, Billing, etc. Controlling time management for production, reducing inefficiencies whenever possible, all stakeholders will benefit. The original print order list:

PAD PRINTING ORDER LIST

Job

Date Order Received

Set-up Time

Production Time

Due Date

A

6/4

hrs.

days

July

B

6/7

hrs.

days

July

C

6/12

hrs.

days

July

D

6/14

hrs.

days

July

E

6/15

hrs.

days

July

FCFS Method -- The First come first serve method puts orders into the queue based on data of original order. The weakness in this method is that longer jobs slow the process and mixed types of orders are inefficient because of set-up times. This method is not recommended due to job idle time, delays, and inefficiencies:

Job

Processing

Time

Flow Time

Due Date

Tardy

A

6 days

6

7-11

B

2 days

8

07-08

C

8 days

16

7-25

D

3 days

19

07-19

0

E

9 days

28

7-26

2

28

77

2

Measurements of effectiveness for above method:

AVT (Average Flow Time)

77/5

15.4 days

AT (Average Tardiness)

2/5

0.4 days

Makespan

28 days

ANJ (Average Number Jobs)

77/28

2.75 day

SPT Method -- The Shortest Processing Time scores jobs based on production issues, in the case, line B. This method will identify the lost-time between jobs and choose and complete job with shortest processing time first, managing time more effectively. This method would meet due deadlines.

Job

Processing

Time

Flow Time

Due Date

Tardy

B

2 days

2

07-08

0

D

3 days

5

07-19

0

A

6 days

11

07-11

0

C

8 days

19

07-25

0

E

9 days

28

07-26

2

28

65

2

Measurements of effectiveness for above method:

AVT (Average Flow Time)

65/5

13 days

AT (Average Tardiness)

2/5

0.4 days

Makespan

28 days

ANJ (Average Number Jobs)

65/28

2.32 days

EDD Method -- Addresses due dates, minimizes lateness and prioritizes products based on the earliest suspense date. While this is a priority, it does not take the processing time into account, resulting in jobs backing up to wait for a longer period time before production commences.

Job

Processing

Time

Flow Time

Due Date

Tardy

B

2 days

2

07-08

0

A

6 days

11

07-11

0

D

3 days

11

07-19

0

C

8 days

19

07-25

0

E

9 days

28

07-26

2

28

65

2

Measurements of effectiveness for above method:

AVT (Average Flow Time)

68/5

13.6 days

AT (Average Tardiness)

You’re 80% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.

Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log in
130,000+ paper examples AI writing assistant Citation generator Cancel anytime
Cite This Paper
PaperDue. (2012). Hi-Ho Yo Case Hi-Ho Yo Inc. Customizes. PaperDue. https://paperdue.com/essay/hi-ho-yo-case-hi-ho-yo-inc-customizes-78851

Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.