Healthcare/Presidential Candidates
Response
No one is happy when taxes go up, but few people recognize the benefits of taxation especially with regards to essential services like health care and education. Americans often forget that public education is fully funded by taxpayer money; citizens simply accept the fact that education is a universal right and that even individuals without children in school know that our society is better off with socialized school systems. Using the same argument, our society would be a much better place if health care were universal and no individual were excluded from receiving the care he or she needs. Rather than suffer, the poor and middle class would boon from universal health care. Taxes would be raised, sure, but the benefits would more than outweigh the costs for almost all taxpayers. The cost of insurance premiums and medical care costs are completely out of reach of the poor and middle class; the amount of taxation required to fund a universal health care program would not even come close to the amount of money spent on insurance. Finally, the wealthy would be paying a higher percentage.
Response to Answer 2
Indeed, Hillary Clinton's proposal is ambitious but amounts to little more than sitting on the fence. Instead of proposing a comprehensive plan for true universal health care, she suggests a convoluted system of tax credits. Income tax forms are complex enough; few citizens can navigate their way through their pages without hiring an expert, and only those who are well-off enough can afford to do so. Hillary's plan only improves slightly on an outworn system. Instead, we need to entirely revamp the concept of health care and change the way Americans view socialized medicine. Whether or not Hillary Clinton was involved in nefarious scandals, she should devise a health care plan that more closely resembles those used successfully in many other countries: taxes fund a federally-funded health care system that completely removes private insurance companies and strips power from the big business stakes at heart in the medical and pharmaceutical industries.
There are a number of issues involved in health care including taxation, the fear of socialized medicine and the budget. Many Americans are opposed to higher taxes for the wealthy due to the fact that they will be the ones paying for most government spending including the proposed heath care bill. These people also argue that it's the wealthy that create jobs through investing and if their taxes are
Still, one has to wonder if the poor will move forward with insurance even with the subsidies. Certainly, many of these individuals will make poor healthcare decisions without federal mandates for healthcare. Clinton's plan is the best because in mandates individual coverage for all Americans. Like Obama's plan, Clinton would provide tax credits for working families to help them cover their costs. Just like individuals need to buy automobile insurance
In fact Congress should pass a bill that gives that prescription drug benefit to Medicare patients. QUESTION NINE: In the United States, healthcare is so expensive that over 45 million people are without health insurance. It is a broken system, leaving out many people, especially children. Recently the executive branch vetoed a bill that would have provided health insurance to millions of middle and low-income children, indicating a lack of
Healthcare Reform Initiatives in California The citizens of California are fortunate to have one of the best healthcare systems in the United States. This paper reviews the laws and initiatives that relate to the healthcare coverage and facilities that are available to Californians. This state has led the way in progressive laws that give consumers the tools to stay as healthy as possible. The Reform Initiatives in California First of all, California was
Health Care Rationing How Health Care Rationing Could Improve the Health of the U.S. Population Health care rationing has often been viewed as something horrific and voiced in the American media as a scare tactic by politicians. For instance, in September 2009 former U.S. vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin claimed that reforms proposed by the Obama administration would bring "rationing" into the American medical system (Hoffman, 2013). However, Palin's claims are rather
Hillary Clinton proposes that every American should be required have coverage, as most health care analysts agree that mandated coverage is necessary, so that the care and contribution of the healthy can effectively balance out the care of the sick. Obama would not require individuals to have coverage, merely require all children to have health insurance, and require employers to offer employee health benefits or contribute to the cost
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now