" According to French (2009), some are of the opinion that avoiding groupthink is the main reason for Obama's assembly of apparent rivals in his cabinet. The author notes however that "healthy disagreement" is the best way to avoid groupthink rather than simply ensuring that there is no agreement within the group.
Research Questions
Several questions emerge from the research problem. The first revolves around President Obama's ability to maintain a paradigm of multiple advocacy as opposed to groupthink in his foreign and domestic policy. Surely, if the Bush administration could begin so well and fail, the same is possible for Obama. Mr. Obama however appears to have avoided at least one mistake in this regard, by selecting a number of advisors he knows would not always agree with him. According to some critics, however, this is not enough (French, 2009). One should also ensure that the disagreement leads to sound decisions rather than merely degenerating into a sense of rivalry among equals. Time will tell how wisely the president has chosen his cabinet "rival," or whether this will eventually also simply degenerate into a type of groupthink.
A second significant question is how groupthink affects the nation as a whole. After 9/11, the collective shock effect upon American citizens was so severe that they apparently would have agreed with anyone who promised to reinstate stability and remove the national pain that was caused. Indeed, the nation as a whole was as much a victim of groupthink as the Bush administration. This could also be seen as a reason for the collective fear and enmity against the Muslim and Arab communities in the country. Furthermore, collective, nation-wide groupthink is at the basis of re-electing a president who has lost the ability to make sound decisions.
A further research question could also revolve around the election paradigm. The election of Obama has been in the spotlight for various reasons. Some have blamed the groupthink phenomenon for his election, where citizens electing him without critically considering his policies. Indeed, it does appear that the national joy at the President's election is somewhat disproportionate to the effort of his campaign....
The research, methods will seek to establish a common basement of the U.S. President Foreign Policy Decision Making Process. Equitable regard will be accorded to the state of affairs that exist between the U.S.A. And Iran Questionnaires Questionnaires are samples of structured questions that will seek directive responses from the respondents in the field of study. In order to arrive at making decisions, there are several considerations that the president of
Franks (along with the Bush war cabinet, including Vice President Dick Chaney) "met repeatedly" to plan the attack on Iraq. It was groupthink through and through. At the same time Bush was saying publicly he was "pursuing a diplomatic solution" (Hamilton, 2004), "intensive war planning" was going on during the whole year 2002. It "created its own momentum" in the administration, Hamilton wrote. In Woodward's book, which was recognized as
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now