Colin Kaepernicks political activism and his symbolic taking the knee have sparked a fierce debate over the power, potential, and possible limitations on freedom of speech. According to an article in The Washington Post, survey after survey has shown that too many students at all levels including in college dont understand free speech and dont know that it is guaranteed by the First Amendment, (Strauss, 2017, p. 1). The reason why I am writing about freedom of speech in relation to the reaction to Kaepernick is that the First Amendment encompasses the fundamental rights and freedoms fundamental to democracy. The goal of the paper is to explain the facts of the case through the lens of both ethics and constitutional law. Ultimately, I want to demonstrate to the audience why a democracy cannot function without freedom of speech. I also want to show why protesting something symbolic like the national anthem is precisely the definition of that fundamental freedom, and how it differs from hate speech.
The specifics of the problem are as follows. First, Kaepernicks protest led to emotionally charged outcry similar to those that ensue following flag burning. I want to acknowledge the validity of these emotional appeals while showing that ironically, taking the knee and burning flags are exactly what those flags and anthems represent in the first place. Second, I want to broach the subject of race and intersectionality to show that the attitudes towards Kaepernick reveal cleavages in American society. Kaepernicks actions demonstrate the need for meaningful dialogue plus original, creative solutions to the problem. One solution I propose is an extensive public relations campaign related to race and racism in America, targeting young people in particular. The anti-smoking campaign has been tremendously helpful in reducing the prevalence of smoking, and in the same way I believe that effective media and public relations can reduce the antagonism shown towards those like Kaepernick and movements like #Blacklivesmatter that epitomize American values.
References
Strauss, V. (2017). A lesson on the free-speech debate Colin Kaepernick started. The Washington Post, 26 Sept, 2017, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/answer-sheet/wp/2017/09/26/too-many-kids-dont-understand-free-speech-heres-a-lesson-on-the-anthem-the-flag-and-individual-liberties/?utm_term=.8b0deacbf409
FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION plays an important role in the doctrines of human liberty. However not every country grants this right to its citizens. There are many countries in the world where freedom of expression is still a contentious issue and which have been categorized by Freedom House as not being entirely free. The United States of America is one country where the constitution gives every American the freedom of speech
Which is the better course of action, Lawrence might ask himself. Should we censor the Westboro Baptist Church and forbid them their right to free speech, or should we allow them to express their wacky, and perhaps injurious views, and fight back with words of compassion, caring, and support. Just because we would like to make a knee-jerk, reactionary law and censor them does not make it the right
Christie provides a few examples of how lawyers use the superimposition of several vague terms to arrive at a workable precision. From the 1938 Restatement of Torts: An activity is ultrahazardous if it (a) necessarily involves a risk of serious harm to the person, land or chattels of others which cannot be eliminated by the exercise of the utmost care, and (b) is not a matter of common usage. (p.
Freedom of the Press in Sharing Sensitive Information The United States Constitution guarantees several individual freedoms including freedom of speech and freedom of the press. However, there are scenarios where freedom of the press and freedom of speech generate significant concerns and questions, especially with regards to sharing sensitive information or addressing controversial issues. In the modern society, many new outlets across mass media compete for people's attention to an extent
Hate Speech and Word Police One of the most basic freedoms of humankind is the freedom of speech. Democratic societies boast about their citizens' right to speak freely. Freedom has always been a controversial topic to people, but once we begin to pursue it, we will find the process being far from a simple one. Everyone has come across the notion of propaganda at least one in their lives. Propaganda relies
Freedom of Expression and Campus Speech Codes The article entitled "On Freedom of Expression and Campus Speech Codes" discussed the importance and utilization of the society and people's freedom of speech in educational institutions. The article provides a thorough analysis of how the imposition of speech codes on campuses and other educational institutions can be detrimental to the implementation and proliferation of the very symbol and important element of democracy,
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now