S. directly. Evidently, the long-term objectives indirectly face the smooth running of the U.S. government. Priority should be given to those aspects that will pull the resources of the country to extreme levels. The U.S. As a super-power is privileged when tackling issues affecting other nations; it is mandated to help developing long-term solutions. Long-term also implies that the impacts and effects need to be widespread in order to maintain balance and ensure the prosperity of all sectors is recognized. The above long-term objectives are issues that need time and resources in order to be able to resolve the issue that affects the stability of these countries among other issues. The Soviet Union, for example, is crying to have political relations with Russia. This means that the military forces will be deployed to this country. However, the negotiation process is hefty and requires time and adequate resources in order to meet the requirements of both parties. This is a long-term objective and will be handled in the second term in office because they need analysis and collection of data. This ensures that dissemination of information is not bias, but fair to all involved parties. Therefore, it is vital for leaders to specify the near and long-term objectives of Office in order to allocate duties to officials in a manner that meets all their educational credentials and areas of specialization. Furthermore, this gives the team time to compile the information investigated without hurrying and hence, all corners of the problem will be weighed and solutions integrated will incorporate all corners of discussion.

For the Balkans and Bosnia military and political developments, this would be categorized in the higher priority section only of the U.S. military were significantly involved. Other priorities include growth of population, environmental protection, political and economic developments. These subjects are categorized alone because they have open sources hence, not sufficient. In addition, other priorities need to be looked into before bringing them forth for discussion since they have no weight. Additionally, the priorities may lack grounds of arguing and are not prioritized because they wasteful and valueless.

The basic aim of prioritizing is to be able to share resources and ensure that all government departments have their roles well played. This technique saves on time and acknowledges the areas deemed to be weak. Therefore, the state will look into these issues later after completing those of the first and the second term. For instance, President Obama made the health reform as his priority because he saw the need to look into the health sector. His main concerns were for the poor, underprivileged member of the society cannot afford insurance, and this has forced them to stealing drugs in order to survive and restore their health. This will mean that some individuals will engage in corrupt deals in order to supply drugs to these individuals at a smaller fee. This act of humanity is unwarranted, but the procedure brings harms to the resources of the hospital. As such, many parties are involved in the failure of the reform system. It is necessary for these groups to ensure that all their needs, goals, and objectives are met.

The differences in these objectives enable analysts to have easy ways of tackling existing problems. Decision makers are also in a position of dwelling on issues that need urgent attention, which shows organization and this leads to effective results. Furthermore, the supplications and plights of the individuals in lower class will be adhered to with no much strain on resources and hence, leaders and government officials will be able to allocate time to investigate and interact with citizens on how their rights are being met. This method is suitable because it enables the widespread of resources and talents in meeting the objectives of their citizens. The truth of the matter is that, without such prioritization, many government officials will lack direction and resources distributed will be depleted due to the inability to plan for future expectations. Forecasting on the future is also attainable due to the ability to read previous patterns of events and this shows that they are keen and recall their past, which contributes to the future.

Evidently, it is imperative for the Office of the President and Congress to prioritize their issues. This enables them run the government smoothly while the organization is maintained and upheld at all times. Policymakers will also be integrated in the process, which shows co-operation and promotes unity in Congress. Isolation possibilities are also minimized because both leaders and citizens press forward to attain their organizational goals and objectives. These aspects also contribute to sharing of information, which is the central part for such organizations...

Analysis and collection of information are the key proponents of such objectives. The stages help leaders in categorizing their priorities into efforts that are highest in rank to those in the lower rank of items or issues.
Foreign and domestic intelligence policies and operations

According to Burnett (2007), domestic terrorism is a planned act by a group of people with evil intentions aimed towards the government or citizens of the nation with the imposition of foreign force. For example, the bombing of the Olympic and Oklahoma City are illustrations of domestic terrorism. International or foreign terrorism, on the other hand, is a plotted plan by groups of individuals against the government under the influence of foreign basis since their intentions, deeds, and motivators are foreigners outside the United States. The report of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) classifies the various terrorist attacks based on technological advancements in possession by the terrorist group, weaknesses available on the terrorist subject, and the surrounding political issues.

These intelligence agencies also use other methods like the use of chemical and biological agents, attack of public services and/or utilities, and attacking transport facilities. Concerning the policies and procedures of domestic intelligence, their activities are limited only to one country. Since the motives are limited, their platform settings are on a smaller one as compared to those of the foreign intelligence group. Furthermore, the policies stipulate that the alliances formed by the domestic terrorist group are also allowed to liaise with foreign states even though they are their global enemy. However, their main target in all this is both national and sub-national.

For domestic intelligence, the complication comes in when different hosts of organizations fragment off their different fractions. The existing diffusion in this group or organization does not imply that they cannot be organized. On the contrary, they bear the characteristics and styles of lone wolves and leaderless operations under resistance. The procedure of dealing with most domestic intelligence groups employed is the use of methods that encompass informants and infiltration, which have succeeded. Questions and concerns rising are whether law enforcement and federal domestic intelligence efforts are going to be integrated and enforced.

The solution to this dilemma is the need for both organizational and management systems succeeding the national and local levels in presenting blueprints. These are going to expand, modify, and improve the nation's domestic intelligence and capabilities of counter-terrorism. The barriers associated to this intelligence system include institutional values, budgetary and legal. Further exacerbation is brought about by the lack of sufficient integration methods into local efforts of law enforcement. The 'ears and eyes' must be the first respondents acting on national effort to bring cohesion in the country.

Therefore, the federal capability ascribed to domestic intelligence systems is insufficient. Foreign intelligence is organized and funded by the international network of terrorists like the use of religion pretexts directing them to United States. In foreign countries, political involvement is the presence of radical Islamist parties. In addition, there is a growing interlink of different groups of terrorist, which may involve the combination of technology transfer, military training, or political advice. The notion of many people is that the reformed FBI should lead the nation by coordination efforts with leaders of the domestic intelligence agency. However, others contend that the FBI is not an entrenched law enforcement agency and thus, this responsibility is not within their scope of duty. The critics of the new domestic intelligence agency argue that ignoring the laws of federalism is unavoidable. The carte blanch should be granted the federal government for intruding into the private lives of American citizens. The worry of having a domestic intelligence reform is the possibility of violating national power balance and federalism laws.

Evidently, the federal government is not in a position to dictate to states what they can do and hence, national standardization is not required. In this case, communication becomes a vital tool for the agency in order to share information with other intelligence community that promotes state rights by overseeing the spying of U.S. citizens. Opponents' view of such agencies is an infringement on state rights, but is an avenue for the federal government to destroy the civil liberties of the U.S. citizens.

The intelligence groups are given the task of bringing together federal and state efforts in a way that will not undermine privacy…