Behavior Experiment
The experiment took place in a busy office building at around five o'clock in the evening. It started on the ground floor and involved walking into an elevator and not turning around. The total number of people who entered the elevator was six, two stopped on the third floor, which was the first stop and the other three stopped on the fifth, which was the last stop. The experiment ended on the fifth floor and took a little over three minutes.
Reactions
The other five people upon entering the elevator realized that not everybody turned to face the entrance as usual. The group seemed baffled with the occurrence. Two people, a female and a male laughed asking jokingly if they were supposed to turn around. They appeared friendly and continued with interesting comment until they left the elevator. The other three smiled but seemed less concerned. However, the experiment attracted an unusual attention. At the first stop, where the two stopped, there were other people waiting for the next elevator going down as suggested by their conversation. On seeing the occurrence, they burst in laughter wondering what was going on. The other three in the elevator were suddenly quite even though they appeared concerned with what was taking place. At the fifth floor there were two other people waiting to get into the elevator going down. They could not understand what was going on, they made faces at each other, an indication that something was unusual. It seemed as though they concluded that what...
Norms are socially accepted and expected behaviors in public that guides people's actions and presentations in public. When broken, they do not constitute serious violations neither do they cause much outrage but the violator is looked at as odd. The experiment above, according to Alder & Alder (2012), constitute what William Summer referred to as common folkway norms ( p. 11). It is not normal for anybody in their right mind to into an elevator and not turn around. It is unacceptable and the reaction from the spectators is reason enough to qualify the act as violation of a norm.
There were reasons for choosing the experiment; first, the area was easily accessible. There were no restriction while entering the building. Second, the place was suitable for observation of the spectators' reactions. Their comments could be heard easily. Therefore, the setting was conducive for the experiment as it was possible to get reaction and feedback after the experiment, validating the results.
Social Construction of Deviance
Once a person is perceived as deviant, the society perform "commitment ceremony" this negatively labels one and the status is not easy to reverse (Erikson, 1966). Labeling is an aspect of social construction of deviance. According to Cullen & Cullen (1978), there are four types of labels…
