Verified Document

Federal Government Control Marijuana Legalization Author's Note Term Paper

¶ … Federal Government Control Marijuana Legalization? Author's note with contact information and more details of collegiate affiliation, etc.

At least a quarter of the advisory is spent asserting the agency's drug approval authority, including the caution that seeking "to bypass the FDA drug approval process would not serve the interests of public health because [it] might expose patients to unsafe and ineffective drug products." Clear away the smoke from the advisory and you find that behind the battle over medical marijuana is the underlying power struggle pervading many of our health care discussions, from abortion to health care access to physician-assisted suicide.

Should the State or Federal Government Control Marijuana Legalization?

It is the opinion of the author that the control over marijuana legalization should be divided between both state and federal government. Power should always be divided. Division of power acts as a safeguard for the people and citizens. Division of power acts as their protection from a fascist...

Division of power could additionally serve as protection from one part of the government controlling one specific area of people's lives. It is American history for states to disagree on topics at the forefront of our culture. Slavery is an example. The recent bank bail-outs are another example. The wars in Afghanistan and Iraq are recent examples, as well. Americans disagree to the point where, as in the case of the Civil War, half of the country is willing to break off and become another country. Homosexual marriage is another recent issue, as is funding for Planned Parenthood. It is American nature to disagree. We cannot neglect the issue of prohibition. Who can imagine America without alcohol or an American in which alcohol is illegal? That would be akin to if…

Sources used in this document:
A state should exercise the power to allow or not allow the legal use of marijuana within its borders. Gostin concurs as he states:

"Although states should be free to be inventive in the face of difficult social problems, they ought not negate federal authority to set national standards for health protection. Rehnquist Court's federalism jurisprudence rarely has protected innovate state experiments but rather has simply repudiated federal health and safety regulation. Not only has the Court thwarted federal regulation of firearms and violence against women, but it has also struck down environmental regulation and antidiscrimination legislation." (Gostin, 2005)

A state should be allowed to decide within what confines the legality exists. A state should also clearly define penalties for breaking such a law. If a state does or does not, by due process, pass a law approving legal marijuana use and possession, that state should be able to do that without interference from the federal government. What the federal government should be allowed to do is respect state authority. The federal government should also be the regulating body. The federal government should procure statistics from these states: if the statistics reveal marijuana use is totally destroying the state and causing everyone to hemorrhage money, and can with satisfaction on the state and federal levels, demonstrate that the
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Medical Marijuana Legalization of Medical
Words: 2800 Length: 11 Document Type: Term Paper

Although the decision does not invalidate laws in the 11 states that have approved medical marijuana, it does prevent protection from prosecution of users and doctors who prescribe the drug (Henderson). The 11 states that have legalized medical marijuana use include Arkansas, Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Michigan, Nevada, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington (Medical). Eight states did so through the initiative process, while Hawaii's law was enacted by the

Proposition of Value -- Policy
Words: 828 Length: 3 Document Type: Essay

However, a consideration of each element of that argument reveals that it is a flawed position. The most effective way of preventing minors from obtaining marijuana would be for government authorities to regulate and control its lawful distribution. There may be now way to ever guarantee that minors will not obtain marijuana, but that problem would be comparable to the current problem of minors obtaining alcohol and cigarettes. Given the

American Drug Policy
Words: 3213 Length: 10 Document Type: Research Paper

Drug Policy American Drug Policy: Marijuana Marijuana is one of the most vilified drugs in history and it very difficult to see just why this is so. The United States used to have a thriving agricultural concern that consisted of hemp (marijuana) famers producing plants for their fibers and seeds. The fibers were used in products such as rope and paper and the seeds were used to make oil which served as

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now