As such, both narrators clearly state their tormentor's favorite things, which would be used towards their demise: "In painting and gemmary, Fortunato, like his countrymen, was a quack, but in the matter of old wines he was sincere."
In "Hop Frog," the narrator opens his story with "I never knew anyone so keenly alive to a joke as the king was." Both references to the favorite skills practiced by the culprits occur close to the beginning of the story, foreshadowing the climax later. Both narrators also provide the climax to their stories close to the end.
The fictional style in which each story is told differs significantly. It is mentioned above that the narrator in "Hop Frog" uses a light, conversational tone for his story. He is not by any means emotionally or otherwise involved in the events. It is his duty to inform the reader of the events as he observes them unfolding. Even when he describes the tyranny of the king and the brutality of his death, the narrator never allows his own emotions or opinions onto the story platform. As such, he acts as a mediator between the reader and the story.
Amontillado's" narrator has no such consideration for the sensibilities of the reader. His emotion, along with his story, is focused on one thing: revenge. After the cold and calculated introduction to the story, the narrator leads his friend into the catacombs. The journey is arduous and long, exhausting not only Fortunato, but to some extent the reader as well.
The climax provided by the "Hop Frog" narrator is more striking than that of "Amontillado." The reason for this may lie in the style of the stories. The tone of the narrator, as well as the way in which he relates events before the climax, forms a sharp contrast with the horror of the burning. The narrator's unchanging conversational tone provides the same contrast. Because "Amontillado" has more focus, the reader also focuses upon the end. Having been prepared for brutality since the start of the story, the reader expects it, and is therefore not as deeply struck by the climax.
Both stories discussed above are beautiful and horrifying in their simplicity. While the respective punishments may seem somewhat extreme, I believe that Poe used these well towards shock and entertainment value for the reader. The narrators make the stories accessible for readers, and enhance their enjoyment. Each narrator is perfectly suited to his story of brooding hatred and revenge.
Sources
Poe, Edgar Allan. Hop Frog. http://www.poestories.com/text.php?file=hop-frog
The Cask of Amontillado.
Edgar Allan Poe: The Man of the Crowd On page 164 of class's anthology there is a work by Edgar Allan Poe entitled "The Man of the Crowd." What interests me about this work is the way that Poe deals with the horror or loneliness and isolation that is so much a part of humanity. In this connection, the question that I want to research is whether this loneliness is really
Both stories told of men who dared to escape their fate, whether it was inevitable death from a plague or the dire consequences of his action, these men seek means to remove themselves from their environment and distance themselves from their actions. Prince Prospero used his wealth as a shield, and he honestly thought he managed to bar Death from his gates. Death cannot be and will never be denied.
After his mother died in 1811, Poe became a ward of John Allan, a wealthy Richmond merchant. The Allan family lived in the United Kingdom from 1815 to 1820 before returning to Richmond. In 1826, Poe enrolled at the University of Virginia. He had to drop out later due to a gambling debt he could not afford to pay. His first book was published in 1827 and three years
Another Poe classic short story entitled the Tell Tale Heart also displayed his unique way of gaining the attention of the reader by use of dark and gloomy descriptions. This story is about going mad and losing one's mind. Poe may have really experienced this process as this story definitely takes a personal tone. The reader cannot help to feel the chaotic feelings that madness brings when grasping the Poe's
Watson, and his several forays into the real world to solve mysteries that confounded others. In this regard, Magistrale reports that, "Dupin solves crimes in part from his ability to identify with the criminal mind. He is capable of empathizing with the criminal psyche because Dupin himself remains essentially isolated from the social world" (21). In fact, Dupin also has a "sidekick" who serves as his narrator. According to
The narrator proceeds to ask the raven a series of questions to which the raven only responds "nevermore," driving the man mad with its lack of answers. The poem ends presumably with the raven still sitting on the bust in the man's house. The questions the man asks are all purposely self-deprecating and demonstrate a strong loneliness that exists in him. This possibly represents Poe trying to relieve himself
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now