Democracy concepts and frameworks

Democracy

Over the decades, the most appropriate forms of government have been hotly debated. Part of the reason for this, is because of the different benefits and drawbacks that it is providing. In the case of democracy, there have been continuing discussions as to if the deliberative structure can address the needs of citizens. To fully understand this requires looking at: if this form of government goes beyond the minimal definition, the various strengths / weaknesses and if this is better alternative. Together, these different elements will highlight: the overall advantages and drawbacks of this form of government.

Does a deliberative democracy improve upon the minimal definition?

Deliberative democracy can improve upon the minimal standards from the basic definition, while at the same time moving away from them. Simply put, this is when you are: using reasoning and logic to set the tone for the political discussion. In general, these kinds of democracies will often involve the citizens coming together in: a public forum and discussing how a host of issues will be dealt with. This would include making all decisions on the various forms of government ranging from: enacting different laws to conducting judicial proceedings. The way that this form of government is improving upon this basic definition, is to ensure that the most reasonable approach is taken (when it comes to various policies and procedures).

At the same time, it is moving away from this definition by: assuming that this approach will address all of the issues affecting society. In this aspect, the various classes and ethnic groups will have different needs. This can be problematic, as this approach is seeking to find an agreeable solution. During this process, one group may have to bend more or could be at a disadvantage in reaching these kinds of compromises. Over the course of time, this form of government will favor the majority vs. The needs of minorities. (Gutman, n.d, pp. 18 -- 24) (Fishkin, n.d, 25 -- 28)

What are the strengths and weaknesses of deliberative or participatory democracy?

The biggest strength of a deliberative democracy is: that the community will come together. This is a part of an effort, to discuss issues that could have an impact upon: the standard of living and the quality of life. This helps to ensure that the policies that are enacted that will sustain these basic principles. Over the course of time, this can provide a stable environment for people to be able to: prosper and comfortably raise their families. This is because the deliberative process, takes into account the views of everyone, to create the best policies that will support these different objectives. Once this occurs, it means each person will have greater economic opportunities. (Gutman, n.d, pp. 18 -- 24) (Fishkin, n.d, 25 -- 28)

The biggest weakness of the deliberative process is: that many minorities will often have major issues that are overlooked. This is problematic, because these kinds of groups inside a community will have their own special needs. In some cases, they want to address past injustices that have occurred. While at other times, they are seeking to gain advantages that can help members of their community.

In a deliberative democracy, the views of the different minorities can often be ignored by the influences of the majority. Where, they (the majority) could force these minority groups to give up more, based upon the influence they have in the process. Once this occurs, it means that you will see policies and laws enacted, that will give advantages to one particular group over the other. (Gutman, n.d, pp. 18 -- 24) (Fishkin, n.d, 25 -- 28)

Is this a better alternative?

Yes and no. This is a better alternative form of government in that: the various policies and regulations will take into account logic as a part of the process. This will ensure that any kind of programs that are implemented is based upon: their effectiveness in addressing the various issues facing the community. Over the course of time, this will increase transparency and it will create programs that address the needs of citizens. (Gutman, n.d, pp. 18 -- 24) (Fishkin, n.d, 25 -- 28)