¶ … Chemistry and Biology on Christian Mind
The Effects Chemistry and Biology on Christian Mind
Science and Christianity share a very conflicting relationship. There are different faces of this relationship and we can determine this relationship by using different models. One of such models suggests that science and Christianity are in conflict with each other. Though both of these areas ask you the same question but the answers which they seek are entirely different. An evident example of this phenomenon is the stuff which is being published by atheist scientists who ask rhetorical questions in their readings which force the people to select either science or religion. [footnoteRef:2] [2: Richard James, Test of FAITH Science and Christianity Unpacked Youth Leader's Guide, (Kingston: Oxygen,) http://www.testoffaith.com/youth/Test_of_FAITH_youth_leaders_guide.pdf (accessed March 19, 2013), 6-8.]
The other model suggests that science and Christianity complement each other. In other words, this model suggests that science and Christianity seek to tell as the reality but from different perspectives. For example, if a question is being raised about human existence and identity that science will answer this question in relation to the biological factors such as, genes, human organs and chemical composition etcetera whereas, religion will seek to answer this question in terms of our relationship with God and His purpose behind creating us. [footnoteRef:3] [3: Richard James, Test of FAITH Science and Christianity Unpacked Youth Leader's Guide, (Kingston: Oxygen,) http://www.testoffaith.com/youth/Test_of_FAITH_youth_leaders_guide.pdf (accessed March 19, 2013), 6-8.]
The other model suggests that science and religion are not overlapping that is they entertain entirely different questions and do not come in between each other's way. And as these are different areas therefore they deal with different phenomenon hence they cannot be conflicting. According to Gould science entertain questions related to facts whereas religion entertain questions related to values, norms, behaviors and ethics. Science uses maths and logic to answer different questions and the tools used in religion are philosophy and theology. [footnoteRef:4] [4: Richard James, Test of FAITH Science and Christianity Unpacked Youth Leader's Guide, (Kingston: Oxygen,) http://www.testoffaith.com/youth/Test_of_FAITH_youth_leaders_guide.pdf (accessed March 19, 2013), 6-8.]
The last model suggests that Christianity and science are interrelated to each other and we can acquire knowledge about one with the help of the other. This view directly opposes the Gould's view. But this model has a lot of opponents as in order to provide information about one area the other must have influence or command over the other area. In addition to that, in order provide information about Christianity, science should be limited to a particular place and time and in order to provide information about science Christianity must leave its empirical thinking and should think in relation to investigations.[footnoteRef:5] [5: Richard James, Test of FAITH Science and Christianity Unpacked Youth Leader's Guide, (Kingston: Oxygen,) http://www.testoffaith.com/youth/Test_of_FAITH_youth_leaders_guide.pdf (accessed March 19, 2013), 6-8.]
There are various views in science that move us closer to God, whereas there are others that move us away from him. The Bible clearly states that there was a beginning point when the heaven and earth were being created by God. However, historically most of the scientists believed that the universe always existed in the same form as it exists today. But this scientific view is being now opposed by the evidence that is being collected by the scientists. This evidence suggests that the universe came out of a black hole explosion at some time in the past and it never existed always. [footnoteRef:6] [6: Robert C. Newman, Christianity and Science, http://www.newmanlib.ibri.org/NewmanPpt/ChrScience.pdf (accessed March 19, 2013).]
The big bang theory does not rule out creation but the special causes of God for which He created in the universe cannot be explained by the systematic ways of science. The big bang theory suggests that the black hole explosion was a result of some unidentifiable cause and even after the decades of research scientists are still not able to find out the reason of the explosion. This suggests that there is some complex cause behind this explosion which cannot be defined in systematic terms. And this suggestion moves us closer to the biblical approach that God created the universe at some beginning point as a result it also moves us closer to God. In addition to that, science is not able to find the reason behind this approach because scientific methodology operates in this world and not before the existence of this universe.[footnoteRef:7] [7: Barry Newman, Vaughan Brown, David Ruys, and Jim Wright, "The questions...
A favorite target for conspiracists today as well as in the past, a group of European intellectuals created the Order of the Illuminati in May 1776, in Bavaria, Germany, under the leadership of Adam Weishaupt (Atkins, 2002). In this regard, Stewart (2002) reports that, "The 'great' conspiracy organized in the last half of the eighteenth century through the efforts of a number of secret societies that were striving for
272). There were great changes taking place during that period in history, and not all of those changes had to do specifically with science. Some of them stemmed from science in other ways, and were encouraged to develop because they had a better framework during that time. Philosophy during that time also had a "momentous transfer of allegiance from religion to science" (Tarnas, 1993; p. 272). That deeply affected how
Many inquiries were made into the universe, from how it worked to its creation, as well as the construction of a workable calendar and an understanding of numerous illnesses. These collective areas of discussion fall under the term of natural philosophy, or philosophy of nature. Before modern science was developed and widely used, natural philosophy was the prominent method of gaining knowledge. So dominant and involved was natural philosophy
" (Wikopedia, n.d.) The social scientists moved from Freud to the idea of Pramatism. "Theodore Porter argued in "The Rise of Statistical Thinking" that the effort to provide a synthetic social science is a matter of both administration and discovery combined, and that the rise of social science was, therefore, marked by both pragmatic needs as much as by theoretical purity." (Wikopedia n.d.) An example of how the social science movement continues
Social Constructionism and Historiography of Science In the historiography of science, the debate between intenalists and externalists has been one of the major fault lines over the past century. While many historians are not specialists in physics, chemistry and biology, by training and experience they also consider the political, economic and cultural influences on any institution and organization in a given period, and science his not been exempt from historicism. Internlaists
" (Ibid) the term cosmology is derived from the Greek word 'kosmos' meaning order and refers to the world and the universe. (Ibid, paraphrased) the cosmologic philosopher is stated to be on who "contemplates the nature of this order and is concerned with the relationships between the plants, the stars and the earth. The laws of the universe are important topics to cosmologic philosophers. They consider the laws of thermodynamics,
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now