The Central Park Jogger Case Johnson's theory is that police interrogation is "ripe for abusive treatment" due to its essentially coercive character and the secrecy that surrounds it. Based on that theory, Johnson takes the position that custodial questioning should be entirely recorded and preserved "so that there is an objective record of the interrogation methods that lead to ‘confession' statements." Johnson's primary method for supporting his theory and position is an in-depth discussion of the "Central Park Jogger" (CJP) case in the context of American culture and history. Johnson gives a brief description of the case, underlining the use of uncorroborated false confessions with no physical evidence tying the Defendants to the scene, resulting in the Defendants' conviction and fully-served prison sentences. Johnson focuses on the racial element of the case, making some logical leaps to support it, and neglecting or glossing over equally important considerations, such as adolescence and some legal concepts. While Johnson's article poses a reasonable theory and position, it would benefit from a wider-ranging, less racially-centered series of arguments, such as those contributed by S. S. Christine.
Psychology -- Central Park Jogger
Matthew Johnson's The Central Park Jogger Case - Police coercion and secrecy in interrogation (Johnson, 2003), posits the reasonable theory that police interrogation is "ripe for abusive treatment" and the equally reasonable position that custodial questioning should be entirely recorded and preserved. While Johnson was wise to focus on the Central Park Jogger case and place it in historical/cultural context, he focused so intently on race considerations that he made some logically weak assertions about the race factor and omitted or glossed over equally effective supporting points about legal principles and the impact of adolescence on false confessions. The results of Johnson's approach are a reasonable theory and a tenable position that could be supported by far stronger arguments.
Introduction
The problem of false confessions remains a significant problem in the American criminal justice system, particularly when the Defendant is a nonwhite adolescent. As the Central Park Jogger case illustrates, a terrible injustice can occur without safeguards to ensure the integrity of the interrogation process and the rights of the accused. Reason dictates that additional measures must be taken to significantly improve an interrogation process that is currently ripe for abuse. Matthew Johnson's article gives a reasonable yet flawed support for some of those measures.
Body:
Johnson's theory is that police interrogation is "ripe for abusive treatment" due to its essentially coercive character and the secrecy that surrounds it (Johnson, 2003). Based on that theory, Johnson takes the position that custodial questioning should be entirely recorded and preserved "so that there is an objective record of the interrogation methods that lead to 'confession' statements" (Johnson, 2003). Though Johnson discusses Illinois Governor Ryan's commutation of 167 death sentences and moratorium on imposition of the death sentence due to police coercion and secrecy in interrogation, Johnson's primary method for supporting his theory and position is an in-depth discussion of the "Central Park Jogger" (CJP) case.
Johnson gives a brief description of the case, in which 5 14-16-year-old Black and Latino youths were convicted for the 1989 gang-rape and brutalization of a white female investment banker who was jogging in Central Park. The convictions were heavily based on videotaped confessions of all 5 suspects, despite the victim's complete amnesia about the incident and the lack of any forensic evidence tying any of the defendants to the crime scene (Johnson, 2003). In addition, the confessions "differed from one another on the specific details of virtually every major aspect of the crime" (Johnson, 2003). Johnson also notes that the prosecution used the theory that the defendants "acted in concert," a legal theory that allows successful prosecution without proving that each defendant actually committed the offenses, only that they acted together with the same intent (Johnson, 2003). In relating the admittedly terrible miscarriage of justice, Johnson neglected to mention the fact that the Defendants were seen among a group of approximately 40 teenaged males who entered Central Park earlier that evening and "assaulted (some very seriously) or attempted to assault several recreational users of the park, mostly joggers and bike riders," and were later arrested as members of that group (Christine, 2007). The Defendants' participation in those large-group assaults in the same park on the same night could reasonably lead police to suspect them of the jogger's nearly fatal assault.
The defendants were given sentences ranging from 7-13 years and completely served their sentences. Thereafter, in 2002, Matias Reyes, a convicted murderer and rapist, confessed that he alone attacked and sexually assaulted the CPJ. In fact, Reyes' DNA was found at the crime scene and there was ample evidence, both before and after the CPJ attack, that Reyes might be the perpetrator of the CPJ attack (Johnson, 2003). After this discovery, the CPJ defendants filed for post-conviction relief, the Manhattan District Attorney released a report agreeing with the Defendants' motions, but the NYPD released a report attempting to rebut at least some of the Defendants' assertions.
Johnson illustrates his points by placing the CPJ case in historical and cultural context.
You’re 77% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.