Paper Example Doctorate 3,212 words

Battle Analysis Battle of Fredericksburg

Last reviewed: February 14, 2014 ~17 min read
Abstract

The topic for this particular paper revolves around the battle analysis of the Battle of Fredricksburg. The paper defines the subject, and then reviews the setting of the battle whereby comparisons between the two forces are made. Thereafter, the paper describes the actions and then assesses the significance of the actions.

Battle Analysis: Battle of Fredricksburg

The Fredericksburg Battle

The fighters who took part in the battle

Union Forces

A number of 31,659 soldiers constituting the Union Forces fought at the Battle of Fredericksburg. The Union Forces came from the Grand Division and were commanded by MG Edwin V. MG Joseph Hooker commanded Sumner from the Center Grand Division which consisted of 40,396 soldiers. MG William B. Franklin was at the helm of affairs of 46,897 soldiers from the Left Grand Division. They were supported by Engineer Corps of 1,329, Reserve Artillery of 1,121, Baynard's Calvary of 3,500, and Provost Guard of 1,096, soldiers.

Confederate Forces

The Fredericksburg battle had Confederate Forces which included the First Corps consisting of 41,294 soldiers who were commanded by LTG James Longstreet. The Second Corps had LTG Thomas J. Jackson as the commander and consisted of 38,931 soldiers. J.E.B Stuart commanded the Calvary Division of 10,701 soldiers while the Corps and Reserve Artillery had 793 soldiers ready for the fight.

b. The time of the fight

The Fredericksburg war started as a result of a historic campaign which was planned and finally executed. The fight lasted for about two months, between November and December 1862. It was fought at a time the weather was extremely cold, being a harsh season of winter.

c. The place where the battle took place

The battle took place at Fredericksburg in Virginia. This place is situated along the River Rappahannock which was in Spotsylvania. The Richmond cities and the capital of the nation are about fifty miles away from Fredericksburg.

2. Background to the Setting

a. The causes of the battle

During those days around 1860s, Fredericksburg in Virginia had grown into a community that was more or less linked up as one big family. This town was the farthest from River Rappahannock. Here, a lot of trading of imported and exported goods took place. However, the modern sailing vessels at the time were larger and, therefore, found it difficult to navigate the Rappahannock. And this greatly hindered the international trade going on in the nearby areas. But this made the inhabitants of Fredericksburg live more comfortably since the city is less congested. In terms of military relevance, the river was a channel of supplies for the soldiers so that they could keep up the fight (Parish. 1991).

b. Fredericksburg experienced a lot of changes through the war, in terms of administration. Since it is very close to Washington and Richmond, it had the ability to assist any of the nearby towns in resisting the other. The town was also a good site for a launch of an attack on the capital of the nation. In addition to this, four different battles were fought within a seventeen mile distance of Fredericksburg. The major action happened in Virginia. The Federal Army of the Potomac headed by Major General Ambrose Burnside struggled to counter-attack the Army of Northern Virginia commanded by Robert E. Lee, and finally captured Richmond. However, this was a very difficult task because the confederates took a defensive position at the west side of the town (Parish. 1991).

3. PERST

a. POLITICAL.

Abraham Lincoln, the sixteenth President of the United States, is known as one of the most famous Presidents of America. But the civil war was one of the most difficult situations he had to manage. At that time, Abraham Lincoln was the president of the nation, and this nation was divided into two very disagreeing regions - the north and the south. And this civil war put so many more domestic issues into his hands than any other President before him had. To make matters worse, he never had any military training or experience. The president did not consider the war from the point-of-view of great historical generals. His view was to justify the cause of the Confederates. This cause could only be met if the armies in the field were productive. But this standpoint was misunderstood by most of the Union and Confederate generals (Stackpole, 1991).

b. ECONOMIC

The growth of the American nation at this time would not be calculated by ordinary population count, or by the measurement of their land space. The growth was a matter of the quantity and quality of canals, roads, railroads, factories and industries, new and more effective techniques of working, and the professional handling of the U.S. revenue by government agencies. One of the keys to America's development is transportation. The railroad played a big role in this. The railroad carried on the process of replacing archetypal ways communication started by canals and roads. It linked up far regions of the nation. The biggest challenge to the American society was that of questioning prevailing ideas in order to accept new ones. And these linking up of regions brought about the rapid growth that led to a huge industrial break-through (Stackpole, 1991).

c. RELIGION.

This battle was planned and fought at a time that families were traditionally supposed to be together. As it so happened, the soldiers were drawn away from their families and the peace of the holiday season. The Thanksgiving and Christmas celebrations were both spent by planning to launch attack through Rappahannock River from the north, or to prepare the defensive position from the south, or to clean up the intense blood-flow occasioned by the fight. After this fight, the people's morale became so very low during the Christmas period. Taking solace in religion, the soldiers mourned the death of their fellow soldiers who were gone. At home, family members were not sure if their beloved ones were still alive after the battle (Stackpole, 1991).

d. SOCIAL

Some important social developments took place as result of the Fredericksburg battle. Confederate soldiers had dug a huge defensive position along River Rappahannock. The Union was able to get along under the leadership of OIC, General Burnside, and also successfully crossed the icy river. And this greatly boosted the Union's cause. It also crushed Lee's morale together with that of his forces. However, there was disarray in the Union forces eventually. Lincoln and Burnsides' critics were silenced with the win at Fredericksburg. And this changed the level of confidence of the division commanders and that of Washington's most powerful politicians (Stackpole, 1991).

e. TECHNOLOGICAL

The soldiers who made up the Confederate did not receive any form of conventional training. They joined the collection of forces without following any uniform standard in weapon or equipment issues. Nor did the forces see to the needs of the soldiers that would help them maintain a high level of productivity on the field of battle. Armored vehicles and other sophisticated machineries were not available at this time in history. Soldiers made use of crude and basic forms of weapons. Both warring sides would utilize different formations in a close range. And so both sides of the battle struggled to take control of the waterway so as to be able to give support to their troop through the use of water vessels (Stackpole, 1991).

4. Comparative study of military systems

The scenario here was that of a civil war. The military systems at that time were of the same quality. Both sides were of the same basic level. The quality of training is crucial and measures the level of accomplishment excepted on the field of battle. As it were, neither side was able to win the war in an outstanding manner without recording so many casualties. The soldiers were meant to employ close range tactics and marksmanship skills. In this, the Union of Forces showcased a higher level of training in tactics than the others. Nevertheless, the longer the war lasted, the greater the number of casualties that would be recorded. Again, being able to shift from one tactical position to the other, in terms of obeying commands and paying attention to control procedures, is one of the greatest discipline the two sides sought to instill in the soldiers. At that time, there was no struggle for air space, not tanks nor heavy artillery pieces, neither were there rockets and guided missiles. They used only close range weapons. They also made use of basic signs for communication. Major means of communication and control of the soldiers during battle was through yelling and written messages (Mitchell, 1955).

5. Issues that led to this battle

The two warring armies had begun to make serious preparations between 1861 and 1862, after the Bull Run battle, in order to better be ready for future battles. Both sides concentrated all their efforts on recruiting new soldiers, training them, procuring supplies, and maintaining other military activities. None of the sides was eager to carry out an offensive operation. The President, impatient in the White House, waited to see how the famous commanding officer would lead his great forces to victory (Mitchell, 1955).

In March, 1862, MG McClellan moved his troop through water to the Peninsula in Virginia, between James River and the York. The reason for this movement was to take over Virginia and Richmond. But Johnston rendered this plan invalid by moving the Confederate soldiers towards the same direction through land. And so, MG McClellan kept his forces in Fort Monroe. That was the time Stonewall Jackson started his campaign for the Shenandoah Valley. And this is where Johnson got injured and Robert E. Lee succeeded him (Mitchell, 1955).

4. The details of the action

a. Weather

The battle was greatly affected by the weather condition at the time. It brought down the tempo of the fight at both sides, especially when there was fog or heavy snowfall. This coupled with entangled bushes and thick terrain brought mobility to a halt at times. But even though the weather was hostile to both sides, it never stopped either side from achieving their tactical goals (Parish, 1995).

b. Observation fields of the battle

The fields of observation favored particularly the Confederate soldiers because of their defensive position. They had the great opportunity of watching their enemy at all times. So they saw when the Union forces made attempts to blockade the river through pontoons. The Confederate soldiers chose a high platform for their defense. As the Union forces forced their way through the river, the likelihood of sustaining huge casualties was imminent since they would be fighting from a lower terrain that that of their enemy. The Confederates had a better chance of firing down at them (Parish, 1995).

c. Cover and concealment

Undoubtedly, the unique concealment and cover was to the advantage of the Confederates. With the higher elevation, the winter snows, thick vegetation, added to the panoramic view of River Rappahannock, the Confederate forces established a good fighting position. The only thing the Union forces had was the river which would only serve as a quick escape route should they need to go on a hasty defense (Parish, 1995).

d. Obstacles

The Confederates had all the advantage in terrain. There were a range of forest-laden hills and streams which lay across the plain, and this was where the Union forces eventually attacked. General Robert E. Lee is known for exhibiting a great ability in utilizing his defensive terrain successfully. He assessed the land and all the ground features and finally took advantages of it. His defensive position took more than seven miles of the land space.

e. Key Terrain

One of the very important strategic places for the two sides is a key terrain. In wars that are fought in close range, having tactical advantage is a great assess which can result in swiftly defeating the enemy. One of the key terrains in the Battle of Fredericksburg is the Rappahannock River which is where the fight actually started. The confederate forces took up about one hundred and fifty foot ridge on the northern side of the river bank. This position is a key one and was employed in procuring supplies for the warring soldiers (Parish, 1995).

f. Avenues of Approach

Almost all the avenues of approach were being monitored by the Confederate forces since the northern side of the river bank served them so well in terms of defense. General Burnside who was the Union commander had chosen to cross the river at three different occasions. Meanwhile, Longstreet's and Jackson's corps had gone their separate ways on December 9. Burnside had a strong feeling that it was the best opportunity to for a greater number of his force to make it across the river without using up so much fire. On reaching the other side of the river, the engineer forces would not be so effective in giving assistance to the infantry forces in case of a need to breach obstacles. The engineers sustained great casualties while building three bridges which the Union forces needed for crossing (Parish, 1995).

VII. Comparative studies of the opposing forces

The Confederate and Union forces were a division of a military power that was up and coming, with which the world will reckon. This division of the nation's military into two halves brought so many problems for the two armies. To procure supplies for them as a unit of army was very difficult let alone at their division. But to the advantage of the Union, they had a greater number of the West Point Graduates. These graduates had received some sort of military indoctrination. But the Confederates had the better conditioned fighters. The southern soldiers had strong agricultural background, the use of firearms, and horsemanship. Numerically, the Union forces had greater advantage because they were attacking and had the help of engineer support. None of the sides had the chance to rehearse that great battle and that was because the bond between units was very weak. Technology did not take a prominent place in this war. But they were able to reconsolidate and replenish their supplies after each encounter and this was critical to future battle operations (Parish, 1995).

8. Description of the plans of the two sides

a. Phase I - Based on intelligent reports gathered by the Union forces, there was an untimely build-up of the pontoons, the engineer combat power, since General Burnside wanted to cross over in three places.

i. Event 1 - The order Halleck gave to Berlin near Harpers Ferry to take the pontoons to Washington was sent through mail. And it only got to the right engineer on 12 November.

ii. Event 2 - General Woodbury who commanded the engineers wired Burnside immediately the thirty-six pontoons got to Washington saying that one train would begin its journey on of 16 and 17 November, and that the General-in-Chief, Halleck, didn't really want to send another train through land (Stackpole, p 97).

iii. Event 3-17 November: Woodbury sent a message to Burnside regarding Major Spaudling's inability to get started, saying that he would start the next day.

iv. Event 4: The train finally started but was slowed down by rain and mud, though it finally floated down.

v. Event 5-21 November: There was the occasion of the arrival of half of LTG Longstreet's First Corp.

vi. Event 6-25 November: The remaining soldiers in LTG Longstreet's force arrived.

vii. Event 7-27 November: the pontoons finally showed up at the summer's headquarters, the Lacy house, which was opposite Fredericksburg. The engineer OIC gave the information later that he would be able to position two bridges across the Rappahannock without encountering any resistance.

viii. Event 8 - Jackson's corps made it to Fredericksburg and there was readiness for fight from two wings of Lee's army.

You’re 80% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.

Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log in
130,000+ paper examples AI writing assistant Citation generator Cancel anytime
References
3 sources cited in this paper
  • Mitchell, J. B. (1955). Decisive Battles of the Civil War. New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons.
  • Parish, P. J. (1991). The American Civil War. New York: Holmes & Meier Publishers, Inc.
  • Stackpole, E. J. (1991). The Fredericksburg Campaign. Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania: Stackpole Books.
Cite This Paper
PaperDue. (2014). Battle Analysis Battle of Fredericksburg. PaperDue. https://paperdue.com/essay/battle-analysis-battle-of-fredericksburg-182727

Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.