¶ … Death and Justice by Edward I. Koch. Former New York City Mayor Ed Koch defends his beliefs and convictions regarding capital punishment, and discuss why it is such a volatile issue facing our country. The article includes Koch's opinions refuting some of the most popular arguments against capital punishment. Koch ends paragraph two with a question because he wants the reader to think about his statement. If he simply made a statement, perhaps the reader might not stop to ponder what he had said, but the question format creates a natural break in the reading, and makes the reader stop to think. Clearly, Koch saw this as a crucial way to begin his essay, and he wanted his readers to look into their own minds and delve into their own beliefs and prejudices about capital punishment. Ending this paragraph with a question is one way to get the reader to stop, perhaps reread the beginning of the essay, and think more about what they have read before they move on.

In paragraph eight, Koch wants to establish the person he is discussed is a vocal and well-known...

Clearly, Koch is going to dispute some of Bedau's thoughts and ideas, and so, he creates a sentence early on that indicates he does not agree with Mr. Bedau, and that he will continue to disagree with him throughout this paragraph as a rebuttal to Bedau's beliefs. The idea that innocent people may be executed, as Bedau believes, is quickly refuted by Mr. Koch when he notes, "If government functioned only when the possibility of error didn't exist, government wouldn't function at all" (Koch 562). Clearly, Mr. Koch sets Bedau up effectively, and then takes down his argument with a logical and nearly refutable argument.
Koch devotes most of his essay to refuting the opposition's arguments because obviously, he believes they are wrong, or misguided at best,…