Antitrust
Failure of the Firm to Increase Market Power through the Merger
Merging refers to a corporate combination of two or more independent companies into one enterprise. A merge can take various forms such as a dominant firm purchasing the shares of another or a mutual agreement by two rival firms to cut unhealthy competition between them. The forms of mergers between companies can be horizontal, vertical or market extensional. The form of merger in our case is horizontal because the two rival firms produce the same commodities and serve the same market. The aim of this merger is to reduce rivalry and increase market power for both companies. The merger did not produce the intended purpose, and as a result, our company has not increased its market power. The aims of the merger were also to increase market efficiency, market extension, eliminate competition from other companies within the industry and cut down operational costs such as taxation. The intention of the merger was also to increase products and service diversification.
In contrast to the high expectations by our company that the merger will be beneficial, the merger does not prove to bring significant benefits to the company. There is an insignificant difference in terms of the market power and product diversification from the period before the merger and after the merger. In contrast to the expectations of FTC, This merger has not increased the market power for the two companies. Each party to the merger does not testify increased benefits from the merge, and in a further analysis, the merger produces various costs for both companies. There are many factors contributing to the failure of this merger. The difference in corporate cultures between the two companies is a major factor contributing to the failure of the merger (Straub, 2007).
The merger ignored the difference in the corporate cultures and focused on the product and market power that each company will benefit from merging. Corporate cultures such as personnel issues are not easy to overcome when a new management comes in and set new rules and regulations. These personnel issues and work environment have resulted in resentments, in our company, and shrinking in productivity. Studies by Straub (2007) show that, the changes brought by mergers are often not easy to integrate with the old system of a company and they result in a drastic drop in the motivation to work productively. The merger produces negative outcomes due to the much attention driven towards cutting costs while neglecting the day-to-day business activities. This prompts customers of the company to flee and consequently a loss in revenues and a failure to meet expectations of shareholders. The merger fails to achieve its goals due to poor governance and poor communication. The merger lacks clarity on decision-making processes and resolution of issues. Irrelevant communication processes and lack of conviction to key stakeholders on the benefits of the merger all contribute to the failure of the merger.
Slow decision-making and poor resolution of issues are an outcome of weak leadership in the merger. Behaviors and ways of working by the managers in the merger do not match the vision and strategies of the merger. In relation to all these problems and lack of dedication by the merging companies towards building a strong merger, our company seeks to withdraw from the merger. Arriving at this decision has taken consideration of many factors, which prove that the merger is not beneficial to our company. The company has not achieved its expectations from the merger and intends to seek a more beneficial and comprehensive form of business integration.
2 Inelastic Price Demand for Plastic Surgery
Inelastic price demand for plastic surgery shows that changes in price do not affect the demand for plastic surgery. In such a situation, a seller can increase the price of plastic surgery without affecting its demand. When the price of plastic surgery rises, the number of operations does not reduce. Price inelastic demand will not cause a reduction in the number of operations. The inelastic price demand takes place in the case of luxury commodities or in commodities that are basic for survival. Addictive commodities such as cigarettes or alcohol also face inelastic price demand. In our case, plastic surgery is both a luxury and a basic commodity. Increasing the price of plastic surgery will not cause a reduction in the number of operations. This is because some people need it for survival especially in medical practice while others need it as a luxury commodity to improve the beauty. In relation to this explanation, the statement is false. When the price of plastic surgery increases, the number of operations will...
Antitrust A common reason for antitrust investigation is with mergers and acquisitions. The Department of Justice must approve proposed mergers, to ensure that the merger or acquisition activity does not unduly restrain competition in an industry or market. One recent example of antitrust investigation came with the bids by Dollar General and Dollar Tree to acquire Family Dollar. The concern was that post-merger, the combined entity would be able to constrain
The Structural approach believes high barriers to entry reduces efficiency and the potential entry may not limit the power of incumbent firms. Chicago believes barriers to entry are due to the efficiency of incumbent firms and the potential to entry limits the economic power of incumbents. On the other hand, New IO believes barriers can be present, especially from the economics of standardization that can lead to market power of
Antitrust Laws: Benefits, Importance, And Effectiveness Standard economic theory holds that sufficient competition is a vital ingredient for the effective functioning of markets, without which unscrupulous players would be better placed to not only obtain monopoly power, but also impede on allocative efficiency by setting prices in their favor (Updegrove, 2007). In order to prevent this and ensure the maintenance of sufficient competition, governments enact antitrust and competition laws and put
Additionally, he argued that the best interest of the consumers, as promoted by Gate's organization, was in fact not the core element of new endeavors, as the company had argued, but that whenever a new product or service was being projected, this would be done in order to serve the financial interests of the organization rather than increase customer utility (Kegel, 2006). In order to better understand why the above mentioned
Government can have some influence on market failures, but cannot eliminate them. Conditions of perfect competition are usually created outside the influence of government. Often, government policy contributes to market failure rather than prevents it. Government can, however, reduce the impact of market failure. The programs by which government would do this must be well-conceived and well-executed, however, or they can worsen market failure. An example of this would be
M&a activity can be conducted in order to lower a firm's cost of capital. This can be done either by lowering the firm's total risk through diversification, by absorbing a company in a lower-risk business than the new parent company, or by using the M&a activity as an opportunity for arbitrage, taking advantage of disequilibrium between currencies and interest rates in two different nations. Corporate organization and ownership issues can
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now