That is evidenced by the fact that prevention messages produced affirmative responses to questions about curtailment and curtailment messages produced affirmative responses to questions about prevention.
(4) Perception of realism is likely a critical element of any anti-drug messaging campaign expected to appeal to a teenage audience.
Exactly what do you recommend for the de-marketing communications campaign?
There would seem to be little basis to presume that either a prevention strategy or a curtailment strategy would be more effective than the other. It is most likely that both approaches would be advisable because teenagers who already use drugs are much less likely to respond as hoped to the curtailment messages whereas teenagers who do not already use drugs would be more likely to respond as hoped to the prevention messages. More specifically, teenagers who already use drugs are beyond the point where a prevention messaging strategy would be productive.
On the other hand, it is conceivable that teenagers who do not already use drugs might respond positively to both prevention and curtailment messages since the risks presented as a consequence of drug use would, presumably, be meaningful and effective in that respect. Nevertheless, these questions should have been investigated by the chosen methodology instead of ignored by the chosen design. In principle, the study, as designed, provided little potential insight into whether a prevention or curtailment messaging strategy would be more useful or which respective messages in each category might be the most effective. If the study were to be redesigned, the following might be a better methodology:
Obviously, if there is any evidence that a given teenager population already uses drugs, the curtailment approach would be more useful than the prevention messaging approach. Because the dangers of drug use is a message more relevant to both groups, it might be advisable to rely on that approach wherever one must be chosen to the exclusion of the other. Unless, there is independent evidence to suggest that the population in whom the messages are expected to be used already use drugs or do not already use drugs, it is likely that there is absolutely no basis for limiting the ultimate initiative to either message. Ultimately, the project should have been better or more particularly designed to identify the best of all possible prevention messages and the best of all possible curtailment messages for an anti-drug initiative that targeted both groups with one message designed to appeal maximally to each.
Anti-Drug Campaign for Teens The Campaign At present, marijuana is the most used drug and most frequently available in United States of America. The American youth takes serious dosages of marijuana. At least 60% of the adult population in United States of America was prone to marijuana in 2002. The statistics were prepared in the supervision of The White House Office of National Drug Control Policy. The website address is www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov . Social
Anti-Smoking Campaign Put Down that Smoke and No One Gets Hurt Australia has been the home to a number of powerful anti-smoking campaigns designed to reduce the harm that smoking causes on the individual level as well as on society as a whole. Smoking is an expensive habit in every way: Not only do cigarettes exact significant costs on an individual level (both financially and, far more importantly, in terms of health)
Half of them will ultimately die from their habit" (Smoking and teens fact sheet, 2009, ALA). Teens continue to smoke in record numbers -- particularly girls, who often report that they use smoking as a method of weight control (Smoking and women fact sheet, 2009, ALA). Demographic groups of teens that report the highest levels of weight consciousness also report the highest increases in rates of smoking: "Between 1992
Teen Drug Abuse - Prescription or Not Differences between nonalcoholic offspring of alcoholics (family history positive, FHP) and matched offspring of nonalcoholics (family history negative, FHN) have been identified on a variety of behavioral, cognitive, and neurological measures. Compared to FHN teens, FHP adolescents and young adults demonstrate more disturbed school careers, impulsivity, rebelliousness, and nonconformity (National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2006); poorer neuropsychological performance (Worden & Slater, 2009);
Marketing Tobacco Marketing: Get Them Young or Not at All The tobacco industry has been in a battle to capture the youth market for decades mainly because of the degree of brand loyalty that is characteristic of cigarette smokers. Cigarette companies have a lot at stake in making sure that their brand is one of the first tried by the young smoker. In its bid to obtain young smokers, R.J. Reynolds created
Cigarettes became popular among World War soldiers as "soldier's smoke (Randall 1999)." Camel held 45% of the U.S. cigarette market by 1923 while Philip Morris produced women's cigarette, described as "mild as May." The American Tobacco Company produced Lucky Strike for women and captured 38% of the market. The number of female teenage smokers increased three times between 1925 and 1935 alone. In the spirit of competition, the American Tobacco
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now