access LexisNexis database Keller Library, student resources tab Course Home
According to the court in this case, the most "jealously" protected free speech is that which prohibits people from taking about matters of public interest and the ideas and notions that surround the concerns of the public.
The Supreme Court of New York originally decided that the defendant's grounds to dismiss the plaintiff's action because there was not a cause of action stated.
The fact in this case are that a radio station made disparaging remarks about a newlywed woman, Annette Esposito-Hilder, in its daily programming show called "Ugliest Bride." However, these radio station representatives did something that they do not usually do which is to provide the real name of the bride, as well as that of her place of employment and of her employers. The bride claimed that doing so was an intentional infliction of emotional stress and took the defendants to court. The defendants, however, tried to have the case dismissed saying that there was a failure to state a cause of action for the lawsuit. However, that cause for a dismissal was rejected by the New York Supreme Court.
4. According to the case, this was not defamation for the simple fact that the remarks that caused the injury were "opinion." Matters of opinion cannot be used under defamation. However, the court approved a filing for the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress.
5. In the decision, the court states that further proceedings will be required because this tort necessitates a jury of the peers of the defendants to decide if the stringent requirements of this tort have been met. Specifically, the jury must decide if the actions and the remarks made by the defendants violated the "bounds of decency" -- which are part of this tort.
6. Yes, I agree with the decision of the court. The reason that it is clear that there was an intentional infliction of emotional distress is because the plaintiff worked at a radio station that competed with the defendants' station. Also, the defendants violated their own rule of the contest by stating the plaintiff's name, her place of employment and the identity of her employers.
Tort Law Case Questions for Barney Barney, how long have you known the plaintiff? Have you lived next door to each other the entire time you have known one another? How would you describe your relationship with the plaintiff? Has it been consistently the same over the years, or has it changed? Would you characterize it as friendly, perhaps even as a friendship or a close friendship? Have you and the plaintiff every had
Tort law relates to the majority of all lawsuits in Civil Courtrooms. In fact, nearly every claim that is set in civil court except for contractual disputes is under the heading of tort law. Tort law is used to address a wrong a person has done to another person and generally involves the award of monetary damages to compensate for the wrong done to them. There are three types of
Tort Law and Trident Diving Company An item that has been recently recalled by the CPSC is the line of High-Pressure Scuba Diving Air Hoses manufactured by Trident Diving Equipment. In this instance, the item has the propensity to cause drowning in those who use it even when properly installed. Trident has received one report of the hose leaking. No injuries have been reported due to the use of this product,
" The Encarta dictionary also uses "force" in this context: "To create something, such as a way through something, using physical strength or another kind of power." In Courtney's case, his power was smooth deception. His polite mannerisms, his seeming grace, his expensive clothes, his high-toned office and expensive homes and generosity to the church -- all these things created a very believable deception, that can be seen as "another kind
Tort Law The tort actions in this case would be the glass in the food that started the event in the first place. The other waiter caused a tort action when he spun into Anna's waiter causing him to be burned with the flaming dish. Anna's waiter would have caused another tort action by throwing the flaming apron and causing a table cloth to be caught on fire as well. This
There are many in this case that should be taken to court in different capacities as liable parties. The school should be considered liable from the standpoint of not having the school grounds locked down during periods of time when the school is closed or they should have someone patrolling the grounds. The school is also responsible for checking the workmanship of the playground equipment and seeing if it is
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now