¶ … 2003, Space Shuttle Columbia destroyed lives crew lost. Within 2 hours loss signal Columbia,
A thorough analysis of the interventions posited by the Columbia Accident Investigation Board (CAIB) following the 2003 Space Shuttle Challenger disaster provides a large amount of insight into what went wrong that fateful February day, as well as how to fix it. These interventions can be stratified into four different categories, those involving techno/structural changes, human processes, those that are multi-faceted and those that pertain to large groups. However, there is an intrinsic connection between categories of many of these interventions, which actually involve more than the aforementioned four stratifications. The lack of safety measures in place during the Columbia accident is directly attributed to the physical errors of the actual craft (techno/structural), management issues resulting in ineffective use of resources (from individual human processes to those involving large organizational groups), as well as misplaced priorities pertaining to budgetary concerns (human processes and large groups). Virtually all of these errors are multi-faceted.
The interventions that are the least multi-faceted pertain to the craftsmanship and physical safety of proposed space crafts. Specifically, recommendation R7.5-1, which calls for an independent Technical Engineering Authority to ensure the maintenance of technical standards (that it would also need to develop) for the duration of the lifetime of the construction of a craft helps to build sound space shuttles. The fact that this recommendation also requires funding from NASA Headquarters itself independent of funding for any specific programs will also aid in its efficacy.
Interventions that correlate directly to the multi-faceted categories are all those that pertain to budgeting issues. These most eminently include findings F7.1-1 and F7.4-2, which refer to "vagaries of changing budgets" (Columbia Accident Investigation Board, 2003, p. 192), and the fact that conventional safety organizations require...
Space Shuttle Challenger disaster took place on January 28, 1986 as the Space Shuttle Challenger blew up into pieces just 73 seconds after its launch. The destruction blew the shuttle into flames and dust causing the death of all seven crew members. Even though the crash was a sad moment in the history of NASA and United States Space programs, it is still being studied merely to figure out
Space Shuttle Columbia Disaster: What Happened and Lessons The Space Shuttle Columbia (Columbia) disaster occurred on the 1st of February, 2003. On its return journey from space following its 28th mission, Columbia disintegrated after re-entering the earth's atmosphere, killing the entire crew.[footnoteRef:1] Whereas technical failures were responsible for the disasters, investigations have extensively faulted deficiencies in NASA's organisational culture, especially in terms of organisational structure, communication, and decision making processes.[footnoteRef:2],[footnoteRef:3] This
They could do it time and time again with success. The first electric car was used on the moon during the Apollo 14 (Endeavor and Falcon) mission (Kennedy Space Center). Meanwhile in Russia While the space program in the United States was busy becoming a popular culture icon, the Russian space program took on a different personality. They still launched missions for "national prestige" (Wade). However, the majority of Soviet missions
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now