probing of issues, and for examining issues that cannot be explained simply. More detailed analysis and open-ended responses are possible, and these add value to the research. Generally, it seeks answers to questions, especially where the answer is open-ended or not known by the research. . As such, qualitative research is often exploratory in nature, seeking to understand phenomena to a level of detail that is not otherwise possible in quantitative research (FHI, 2016).
Qualitative research is used in market research, for example, to augment the market and demographic data that a company gathers. It can gather consumer perceptions, such as in a focus group, or it can seek to explain factors, like interviewing former customers about why they stopped doing business with your company. These are the sort of impressionistic, in-depth things that qualitative research can lend to marketing studies, over and above the usual market variables -- the…...

mla

References

FHI (2016). Qualitative research methods overview. Family Health International. Retrieved April 20, 2016 from  http://www.ccs.neu.edu/course/is4800sp12/resources/qualmethods.pdf 

Gummesson, E. (2005). Qualitative research in marketing: Road map for a wilderness of complexity and unpredictability. European Journal of Marketing. Vol 39 (3/4) 309-327.

Participant Information Sheet: Trauma Center Stakeholders Survey Questionnaires, Document eview
Effectiveness of Emergency Management and Disaster eadiness of Trauma Centers in Washington, DC

Hospital Trauma Staff Administration

My name is and I am currently undertaking a graduate degree in the School of Public Service Leadership at the Capella University of, under the supervision of I am writing to request the participation in my research study on the implementation of emergency management and disaster readiness of trauma centers in the Washington, DC metropolitan area and Washington County.

I want to learn more about the experiences and perceptions of stakeholders who are engaged in the work of trauma centers in Washington, DC. The purpose of my study is to add to the literature on the efficacy of trauma center models currently implemented at your facility. The proposed research may inform disaster preparedness and emergency management policy and practice in the U.S.

The qualitative research is designed to…...

The locus in this study would be to take the concepts of what is perceived as the duties of the resource officers and using these to determine what it is they can do to alleviate some of the concerns that face middle schools today.
Both the focus and the locus help the researcher to formulate the questions that they hope to answer by doing the research that they are looking at. Devising good questions from the beginning will help ensure that the appropriate research is conducted and good results are obtained.

SUBJECT: Generating an analytic memo

A good analytic memo should focus on a single term or idea within the research that is being done. The memo should explore the concepts characteristics while exploring the ways in which these characteristics might vary within different contexts.

In the study regarding resource officers' perceptions of their duties in suburban middle schools one concept that would…...

mla

References

Conceptual. (n.d.). Retrieved May 9, 2009, from The Free Dictionary Web site:

 http://www.thefreedictionary.com/conceptually 

Empirical. (n.d.). Retrieved May 9, 2009, from The Free Dictionary Web site:

 http://www.thefreedictionary.com/empirical

Assignment 1 Phenomenological psychology focuses on the subjective experiences of individuals. The “founder” of phenomenology, Edmund Husserl presented a cohesive methodology and philosophical framework that laid the foundation for phenomenological psychology. One of the greatest challenges of phenomenological psychology is differentiating between the unique subjective experiences and perceptions of individuals and the need to discern an objective, shared reality. Phenomenological psychology is almost easier to define by what it is not: it is not about using the scientific method to study human behavior, and it is not about studying personality or psychoses. Rather, phenomenological psychology is about understanding the nature of reality itself, through an evaluation of both individual and collective human psychological experience. Husserl set forth principles for ontology in psychology as well as epistemology, which can be especially useful when studying the divergent experiences of those with psychotic disorders like schizophrenia, whose sense of reality is radically different from…...

Nursing Study on Hourly ounding
Qualitative nursing Study on Hourly ounding

Similarities and difference to other quantitative articles

Similar to other qualitative papers, ethnographic researchers target the inclusion and representation of the views and observations of the subjects. The questions in qualitative and ethnographic researchers try to focus on the understanding of the subjects in their engagements in the day-to-day experiences. It is the interests of qualitative and ethnographic researchers to seek the relative positions and evaluations of the subjects about the subject matter (Green, Dixon, & Zaharlick, 2002).

Qualitative and ethnographic researchers obtain guidance on implementation and design in conducting their study from the theoretical orientations. These orientations include data collections tools -- interviews, artifacts, participant observation -- and data analysis measures (Green et al., 2002). Theoretical guides also direct on measures of entering the field, data to collect, the relevant literature to retain, necessary records to make and period to take…...

mla

References

Green, J., Dixon, C., & Zaharlick, A. (2002). "Ethnography As A Logic Of Inquiry." In Handbook For Methods Of Research On English Language Arts Teaching, Ed. James Flood, Julie Jensen, Diane Lapp, And James Squire. New York: Macmillan.

LoBiondo-Wood, G., & Haber, J. (2013). Nursing Research: Methods and Critical Appraisal for Evidence-Based Practice: Elsevier - Health Sciences Division.

proponents of evidence based instruction represent one end of the methods of teaching continuum where practices that have been tested empirically using rigorous research designs are considered to be the only valid method of instruction (Odom et al., 2005). On the other end of the spectrum are methods that may be have some basis for use such an intuition, theory, etc. But have not been subject to empirical scrutiny are considered valid to use. Evidence based instruction or scientific research-based instruction consists of instructional practices or programs for which empirical data have been collected to determine the effectiveness of the program (Odom et al., 2005). In these types of practices/programs rigorous research designs have been conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the practices. Such research designs can include randomized, controlled trials; quasi-experiments; single subject designs; correlational methods, and/or qualitative research. The most empirically sound designs, randomized controlled experiments, are…...

mla

References

August, D., & Shanahan, T. (Eds.). (2006). Executive summary. Developing literacy in second- language learners: Report of the National Literacy Panel on Language-Minority Children and Youth. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Condelli, L., & Wrigley, H.S. (2004). Identifying promising interventions for adult ESL literacy students: A review of the literature. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences.

Foorman, B.R., & Torgesen, J. (2001). Critical elements of classroom and small-group instruction promote reading success in all children. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16, 203 -- 213.

Odom, S.L., Brantlinger, E., Gersten, R., Homer, R.H., Thompson, B., & Harris, K.R. (2005). Research in special education: Scientific methods and evidence-based practices. Exceptional Children, 71, 137-149.

Qualitative Case Study AssignmentIntroductionThe qualitative case study serves as a research methodology that enables the exploration of a specific phenomenon within a particular context, utilizing various data sources. This approach examines the phenomenon from multiple perspectives, unveiling its diverse facets (Baxter & Jack, 2008). By investigating real-time occurrences within their natural contexts, case studies acknowledge the influence of the surrounding circumstances (Kaarbo & Beasley, 1999).A case study is a commonly employed methodology within qualitative research (Yazan, 2015). Nevertheless, due to the lack of well-structured and comprehensive protocols, it has not established itself as a fully recognized social science research strategy (Yin, 2002). Consequently, novice researchers who intend to utilize this methodology often face confusion regarding the essence of a case study and its distinction from other qualitative research methods (Merriam, 1998).While a considerable amount of literature exists on the theory and application of qualitative research (see Creswell, 2013; Marshall &…...

mla

ReferencesAnthony, S., & Jack, S. (2009). Qualitative case study methodology in nursing research: An integrative review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 65(6), 1171-1181.Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544-559. Retrieved from   S. L., Ireland, S., Kirkpatrick, H., & Robertson, K. (2013). Using Stake’s Qualitative Case Study Approach to Explore Implementation of Evidence-Based Practice. Qualitative Health Research, 23(9), 1267–1275.Boyne, G. A. (2004). Explaining public service performance: does management matter? Public Policy and Administration, 19(4), 100-117. doi: 10.1177/095207670401900406Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Creswell, J. W., Hanson, W. E., Clark Plano, V. L., & Morales, A. (2007). Qualitative research designs: Selection and implementation. The Counselling Psychologist, 35, 236–264.Creswell, J. W., Hanson, W. E., Plano, V. L. C., & Morales, A. (2007). Qualitative research designs selection and implementation. The Counseling Psychologist, 35(2), 236-264.Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Fleury, S., Bloch, R., Bravo, R., & Bicudo, V. (2003). Análise do perfil dos artigos publicados na Revista de Administração Pública. Rio de Janeiro: EAESP/FGV.Gill, J., & Meier, K. (2000). Public administration research and practice: a methodological manifesto. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(1), 157-199.Gondim, S., Sá, M., Melo, L., Barbosa, S., Vasconcellos, C., & Gomes, S. (2005). Da descrição do caso à construção da teoria ou da teoria à exemplificação do caso? Uma das encruzilhadas da produção do conhecimento em administração e áreas afins. Organizações & Sociedade, 12(35), 47-68.Guerra, M., Gomes, A. de O., & Filho, A. I. da S. (n.d.). Case Study in Public Administration: A Critical Review of Brazilian Scientific Production. RAC, Rio de Janeiro, v. 19, n. 2, art. 6, pp. 270-289.Hancock, D. R., & Algozzine, B. (2016). Doing case study research: A practical guide for beginning researchers. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Hocayen-da-Silva, A. J., Rossoni, L., & Ferreira, I., Jr. (2008). Administração pública e gestão social: a produção científica brasileira entre 2000 e 2005. Revista de Administração Pública, 42(4), 655-680. doi: 10.1590/S0034-76122008000400002Kaarbo, J., & Beasley, R. K. (1999). A practical guide to the comparative case study method in political psychology. Political Psychology, 20, 369–391.Kettl, D. F. (2000). Public administration at the millennium: the state of the field. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(1), 7-34.Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2014). Designing qualitative research (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Merriam, S. B. (2002). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley.Ongaro, E. (2008). Introduction: the reform of public management in France, Greece, Italy, Portugal, and Spain. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 21(2), 101-117.Parlett, M., & Hamilton, D. (1976). Evaluation as illumination: A new approach to the study of innovative programmes. In G. Glass (Ed.), Evaluation studies review annual, I (pp. 140-157). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications.Rashid, Y., Rashid, A., Warraich, M. A., Sabir, S. S., & Waseem, A. (2019). Case Study Method: A Step-by-Step Guide for Business Researchers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1–13.Roesch, S. (2003). Quem responde pelo desempenho limitado da produção científica em administração no Brasil? Organizações & Sociedade, 10(28), 165-167.Stake, R. E. (1994). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 236-247). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Stake, R. E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 443-466). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Yazan, B. (2015). Three approaches to case study methods in education: Yin, Merriam, and Stake. The Qualitative Report, 20(2), 134-152. Retrieved from  http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR20/2/yazan1.pdf Yin, R. K. (2002). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.Yin, R. K. (2009). How to do better case studies. The SAGE Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods, 2, 254–282.Yin, R. K. (2011). Applications of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR13-4/baxter.pdf Boblin,

language facilitates criticism and understanding? hy or hy not?
Qualitative language, that is language that is not quantifiable and thus dwells in the realm of the sort of academic criticism and research "that produces findings not arrived at by means of statistical procedures or other means of quantification," remains a critical mode of expression, even in areas of study of the social sciences where "hard data" is a must. (Hoepfl, 1997, p.13) "here quantitative researchers seek causal determination, prediction, and generalization of findings, qualitative researchers seek instead illumination, understanding, and extrapolation to similar situations. Qualitative analysis results in a different type of knowledge than does quantitative inquiry. " (Hoepfl, 1997, p.13). But one must take precautions to make sure that the subjective nature of qualitative language does not impede, but rather facilitates understanding of a subject. To take just one example of how the qualitative association of words, can skew…...

mla

Works Cited

Custer, R.L. (1996). Qualitative research methodologies. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 34, 3-6. Retrieved 13 May 2005 from Qualitative Research Database at ttp://www2.gsu.edu/~mstswh/courses/it7000/papers/qualitat.htm

Hoepfl, M.C. (1997, Fall). Choosing qualitative research: A primer for technology education researchers. Journal of Technology, 9, 12-39. Retrieved 13 May 2005 from Qualitative Research Database at ttp://www2.gsu.edu/~mstswh/courses/it7000/papers/qualitat.htm

Sutton, B. (1993). The rationale for qualitative research: A review of principles and theoretical foundations. Library Quarterly, 63, 411-430. Retrieved 13 May 2005 from Qualitative Research Database at ttp://www2.gsu.edu/~mstswh/courses/it7000/papers/qualitat.htm

esearch Proposaleparations for Black Communities in Chicago through Educational eformQualitative esearch Methods IAbstractThis research proposal explores the feasibility of employing educational reforms as a form of reparations for Black communities in Chicago, addressing the persistent educational disparities rooted in systemic racism and the legacy of slavery. The study adopts a qualitative research design, utilizing in-depth semi-structured interviews, focus groups, and participatory observations to gather rich narratives from Black students, educators, and community members. These methods aim to capture the lived experiences, challenges, and aspirations within the educational system, providing a comprehensive understanding of the disparities faced by Black communities in Chicago. Guided by Critical ace Theory and eparative Justice, the analysis employs Braun and Clarke\\\'s thematic analysis framework, ensuring an inductive and iterative approach to data interpretation. Ethical considerations, including Institutional eview Board approval, informed consent, and confidentiality, are prioritized to protect participants\\\' dignity and rights. The study\\\'s trustworthiness is…...

mla

References 26Appendices 28Informed Consent Form for Participation in Research Study 28Reparations for Black Communities in Chicago through Educational ReformOverviewThe city of Chicago has a long history with a diverse population. Today, it stands as a microcosm of the United States\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\' broader socio-economic and racial dynamics. Within this urban setting, the educational experiences of Black communities represent, however, a profound and persistent disparity. This chasm in educational opportunities and outcomes is a product of contemporary policy failures rooted in systemic racism and the legacy of slavery (Wright II et al., 2022). For generations, these communities have existed within an educational system that has been shaped and constrained by these historical forces, resulting in a compounding of disadvantage that has ramifications far outside schools and classrooms.These disparities manifest in various dimensions of the educational experience, including access to quality schools, availability of advanced placement courses, experienced and well-supported teachers, and educational resources and infrastructure (Alam & Mohanty, 2023). These inequities are further exacerbated by socioeconomic factors that disproportionately affect Black families, such as poverty, housing instability, and access to healthcare and nutrition, which in turn impact students\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\' readiness to learn and succeed academically (Supovitz, 2023). The educational experiences of Black students in Chicago is thus situated within a structure that has been historically designed to marginalize and limit their educational and, by extension, socio-economic prospects.Problem StatementThe educational system in Chicago reflects wider national trends and is marred by deep-seated inequities that disproportionately hinder Black students, particularly those in impoverished areas (Small, 2020). These disparities are not incidental but are the product of a complex interplay of factors rooted in a long history of systemic racism. This systemic racism has manifested in policies and practices that have historically segregated communities, allocated resources inequitably, and curtailed educational opportunities for Black students. The legacy of such systemic barriers is a terrain of educational inequity that perpetuates the cycle of disadvantage and limits the potential for upward mobility among Black communities in Chicago.These educational inequities are a critical concern because education is a fundamental driver of individual and community development, economic stability, and societal progress. The systemic denial of equitable educational opportunities to Black students not only undermines their individual potential but also perpetuates broader patterns of racial inequality and injustice. Addressing these disparities requires a comprehensive understanding of their historical roots and a concerted effort to dismantle the systemic barriers that sustain them.Purpose StatementThe purpose of this study is to explore the feasibility of educational reforms as a form of reparations for Black communities in Chicago. This research aims to address the financial burdens and systemic barriers that disproportionately affect Black students in economically disadvantaged areas, recognizing the enduring impact of historical slavery and systemic racism in the United States. As it frames educational reform within the context of reparations, this study aims to acknowledge and address the historical injustices that have shaped the current educational disparities faced by Black communities in Chicago.This exploration is predicated on the belief that educational equity is a critical component of reparative justice. In proposing and examining targeted educational reforms, the study seeks to identify and advocate for strategies that can alleviate the educational disparities that stem from historical oppression. The ultimate goal is to contribute to the development of an educational system in Chicago that is truly equitable, just, and capable of providing all students, regardless of their racial or economic background, with the opportunities and resources necessary to succeed. This research seeks to pave the way for systemic changes that not only address the symptoms of educational inequity but also confront and rectify its underlying causes, offering a blueprint for transformative justice in education.Research Question(RQ1) What are the lived experiences and perspectives of Black students, educators, and community members in poverty-stricken areas of Chicago regarding the impact of historical oppression on their educational opportunities and outcomes? The research question posed in this study is designed to address significant gaps in the current understanding of educational disparities within Black communities in Chicago (Rubin et al., 2020). This question is not only relevant but essential for several reasons:RQ1: Understanding Lived ExperiencesThe research question will guide the examination into the lived experiences and perspectives of Black students, educators, and community members in poverty-stricken areas of Chicago. This inquiry is important for several reasons.Qualitative EvidenceIt aims to gather qualitative evidence on how historical oppression has impacted educational opportunities and outcomes, to arrive at a better understanding of the human experience of education in these communities.Voice to Marginalized CommunitiesThis question gives voice to individuals and communities who are often marginalized in educational research and policy-making. Because it focuses on their perspectives and experiences, the study acknowledges the importance of including those most affected by educational disparities in the conversation about reform.Identify Specific Challenges and NeedsUnderstanding the specific challenges and needs of Black students, educators, and community members can inform more targeted and effective interventions. It allows for the identification of unique factors that contribute to educational disparities, which may not be apparent without a deep dive into the lived experiences of those within the affected communities.Addressing the Gap in ResearchTogether, these research questions address a critical gap in the existing body of research by focusing on both the micro (individual and community-level experiences) and macro (systemic reforms) aspects of educational disparities. Most existing research tends to focus on one aspect or the other, often neglecting the interplay between lived experiences and systemic changes. Through the integration of these two dimensions, this study seeks to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the problem and a more holistic approach to addressing it. Moreover, situating the study within the context of reparative justice and targeted reforms offers a novel approach that can contribute to the broader discourse on educational equity and reform.Overview of Research DesignThis study employs a qualitative research design to explore the lived experiences and perspectives of Black students, educators, and community members in impecunious areas of Chicago, alongside the potential for targeted educational reforms. The design is rooted in narrative inquiry and phenomenological approaches, aiming to capture the depth and complexity of participants\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\' experiences and insights. Data collection methods will include in-depth interviews, focus groups, and participatory observation, allowing for a rich, detailed understanding of the impact of historical oppression on educational opportunities and outcomes. This approach also supports the development and evaluation of targeted educational reforms by engaging directly with those most affected by educational disparities.Rationale & SignificanceThe rationale behind this research stems from the urgent need to address the systemic inequities in education faced by Black communities in Chicago. The significance of this study lies in its potential to contribute to the body of knowledge on educational disparities, offering evidence-based insights into the lived realities of those affected by historical oppression. Because it is qualitative, this research is exploratory for the purpose of obtaining deeper understanding that can inform more empathetic, effective, and justice-oriented educational policies and practices. At the same time, this research into the lived experiences of the interviewees can contribute to the development of targeted educational reforms to address the specific needs of Black communities in Chicago. The lived lives and actual experiences of Black communities are currently vital but untapped reservoirs of information. Once obtained that information will be helpful in the later development of solutions. Situating educational reforms within a reparative justice framework also represents a novel contribution to the discourse on educational equity, advocating for solutions that not only address present inequities but also acknowledge and seek to remedy historical injustices.Role of the Researcher (Positionality Statement)As the researcher, my positionality is shaped by my own educational background, experiences, and socio-political consciousness. As an individual from the far southside of Chicago, my personal journey as a Black man intricately intertwines with the diverse tapestry of experiences I aim to explore through interviews, focus groups, and participatory observations. I acknowledge my role as both an observer and participant within the educational landscape, bringing my own perspectives and biases to the research process. My commitment to social justice and educational equity guides my approach, with an awareness of the power dynamics inherent in the research process. I aim to conduct this research with humility, reflexivity, and a commitment to ethical engagement, striving to amplify the voices and experiences of participants while minimizing any potential harm or misrepresentation.Researcher AssumptionsI enter this research with several assumptions:· That educational disparities in Chicago\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s Black communities are significantly influenced by historical and systemic racism.· That the perspectives and experiences of those living in poverty-stricken areas are essential for understanding the full impact of these disparities.· That targeted educational reforms have the potential to act as a form of reparative justice, contributing to the dismantling of systemic barriers to equity.These assumptions are grounded in existing literature and my own observations but will be critically examined throughout the research process.Definition of Key TerminologyEducational Disparities: Differences in educational resources, opportunities, and outcomes that disproportionately affect certain groups, often based on race, socio-economic status, and geographical location.Systemic Racism: The complex interaction of policies, practices, and cultural representations that reinforce and perpetuate racial inequity and discrimination across various societal systems, including education.Reparative Justice: An approach to justice that focuses on repairing the harm caused by injustices, often through restitution, compensation, and the transformation of social relations and systems that enabled the injustices.Qualitative Research: A research methodology that seeks to understand phenomena through the in-depth exploration of human experiences, perceptions, and social contexts, primarily through narrative and observational methods.Literature Review IntroductionThis literature review examines existing research and theoretical perspectives related to educational disparities among Black communities in Chicago, the impact of historical oppression on these disparities, and the potential for educational reforms as reparative measures. The review is structured around three main themes that emerge from the literature: the historical roots of educational inequities, the current landscape of educational disparities, and strategies for educational reform and reparations. Through this review, this study can be contextualized within the wider academic discourse, highlighting gaps that our research aims to address.Review of LiteratureTheme 1: Historical Roots of Educational InequitiesResearch within this theme explores the historical underpinnings of educational disparities, tracing back to the era of segregation and discriminatory policies that explicitly excluded Black students from accessing quality education. Studies highlight how these historical injustices have left enduring marks on the educational landscape, affecting generations of Black students. For instance, Anderson (1988) in \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"The Education of Blacks in the South, 1860-1935\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\" provides a seminal analysis of how post-Civil War policies shaped educational opportunities for Black Americans, laying the groundwork for contemporary disparities.Theme 2: Current Landscape of Educational DisparitiesThis theme focuses on the present-day manifestations of educational inequities, detailing how factors such as school funding formulas, teacher quality, and curriculum relevance continue to disadvantage Black students. Research shows that schools serving predominantly Black communities often receive fewer resources, employ less experienced teachers, and have lower graduation rates compared to schools in more affluent, predominantly White neighborhoods. Works by Darling-Hammond (2010) in \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"The Flat World and Education\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\" and Kozol (1991) in \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"Savage Inequalities\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\" provide detailed accounts of these disparities and their impacts on students\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\' educational experiences and outcomes.Theme 3: Strategies for Educational Reform and ReparationsThe literature on educational reform and reparations discusses various approaches to addressing the inequities faced by Black students, including policy changes, community engagement initiatives, and the implementation of culturally relevant pedagogy. Scholars argue for targeted interventions that not only address the symptoms of educational disparities but also tackle their root causes, including historical oppression and systemic racism. Ladson-Billings (2006) in \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"From the Achievement Gap to the Education Debt: Understanding Achievement in U.S. Schools\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\" introduces the concept of \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"education debt,\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\" advocating for reparations as a means to address the cumulative effects of educational inequities.Conceptual or Theoretical FrameworkThe conceptual framework for this study draws on Critical Race Theory (CRT) and the theory of Reparative Justice. CRT provides a lens through which to understand educational disparities as a function of systemic racism, emphasizing the importance of recognizing and addressing the racialized nature of educational inequities. Delgado and Stefancic (2017) describe CRT as a movement that seeks to examine the relationship between race, racism, and power in society. Reparative Justice theory complements this by offering a framework for developing educational reforms that not only seek to address current disparities but also acknowledge and remedy the historical injustices that have contributed to the present situation. This combination of CRT and Reparative Justice theory underpins our approach to investigating the feasibility of educational reforms as a form of reparations for Black communities in Chicago, guiding our analysis of both the problem and potential solutions.Methodology and MethodsIntroduction/OverviewThis study adopts a narrative-based qualitative research methodology to explore the lived experiences and perspectives of Black students, educators, and community members regarding the impact of historical oppression on their educational opportunities and outcomes in Chicago. Qualitative methods are chosen for their strength in uncovering the depth, complexity, and nuance of human experiences, particularly in contexts of inequality and injustice. A narrative approach, in particular, is well-suited for capturing the rich, detailed stories that can inform reparative educational reforms. This methodology emphasizes the power of personal and communal narratives in understanding the multifaceted realities of participants, offering a unique lens through which to view the educational landscape of Chicago\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s Black communities.Rationale for Research Design/Methodology Literature ReviewThe narrative-based qualitative research methodology is central to this study\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s objective of exploring the intricate dynamics of educational disparities influenced by systemic racism, historical oppression, and socio-economic factors. Such an approach is particularly effective in engaging with the lived experiences of Black communities in Chicago, allowing for an in-depth exploration of how these factors intersect to shape educational outcomes (Creswell & Poth, 2018). By prioritizing narrative methods such as in-depth interviews, focus groups, and narrative analysis, the research places the voices and lived experiences of those directly impacted by educational inequities at the forefront of the inquiry. This ensures that their stories and perspectives are not just included but are pivotal to the analysis and conclusions drawn.The inherent flexibility of narrative-based qualitative research facilitates the exploration of phenomena as experienced by participants, without the constraints of preconceived notions or rigid analytical frameworks that might overlook the complexities of marginalized communities (Merriam & Tisdell, 2015). This approach supports an iterative process of data collection and analysis, allowing for a deeper engagement with the material and subjective experiences of participants. Such depth is vital for addressing the nuanced questions central to this study, particularly regarding the effects of historical oppression and the avenues for achieving reparative justice through educational reform.Grounding the study in Critical Race Theory (CRT) and Reparative Justice further supports the importance of a narrative approach. CRT emphasizes the role of storytelling and narrative in examining and contesting racism and inequality, making narrative methods an ideal fit for research informed by this theoretical lens (Delgado & Stefancic, 2017). The focus on narratives allows for a critical examination of the socio-historical contexts of educational disparities, highlighting the significance of personal and collective stories in understanding and addressing these issues.Furthermore, the emphasis on Reparative Justice aligns with the narrative methodology\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s capacity to articulate the processes and outcomes necessary for genuine healing and systemic transformation. Narrative approaches open the way for a detailed understanding of harm from the perspectives of those who have experienced it, facilitating a methodological pathway that captures these intricacies in depth (Atkinson, et al., 2001). Through focusing on narrative methods, this study aims to contribute to the broader discourse on educational equity and reform, offering insights that could inform more empathetic, effective, and justice-oriented educational policies and practices.Narrative-based research has increasingly been recognized for its value in social sciences and educational research, offering profound insights into the complex interplay of individual experiences and broader socio-cultural contexts. Scholars such as Riessman (2008) and Chase (2007) have shown the importance of narrative methods in capturing the richness and depth of human experiences, arguing that stories are fundamental to the way individuals make sense of their lives and the world around them. These narratives offer a powerful lens through which to explore identity, agency, and the impact of social structures on individual lives, making them particularly relevant for studies focused on marginalized communities and issues of social justice.The value of narrative-based research lies in its ability to highlight the subjectivity and agency of participants, providing insights into their lived experiences that other methods may not capture. This approach respects the complexity of human experiences, recognizing that people live through and understand their lives in the form of stories. Bruner (1991) posits that narratives are ways of telling about experiences and are also a fundamental means by which we interpret our world. This perspective aligns with the objectives of narrative-based research, emphasizing the importance of understanding individuals\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\' experiences within their cultural and historical contexts.Narrative-based research is particularly applicable to this study on educational reforms as a form of reparations for Black communities in Chicago for several reasons. First, it allows for an exploration of the personal and communal impacts of historical oppression and systemic racism on educational opportunities and outcomes. By gathering and analyzing narratives from Black students, educators, and community members, the research can uncover the nuanced ways in which these forces shape educational experiences and perceptions. Second, narrative research facilitates a deeper understanding of the potential for educational reforms to address and rectify historical injustices. Through the collection of stories, the study can identify themes of resilience, resistance, and transformation that are central to reparative justice. Finally, by centering the voices of those directly impacted by educational inequities, narrative-based research challenges the dominant discourses that often marginalize or overlook the experiences of Black communities. This approach not only contributes to a more nuanced understanding of educational disparities but also empowers participants by valuing their stories as essential sources of knowledge and insight.Research Setting/ContextThe research will be conducted in impoverished areas of Chicago, identified through socio-economic data and educational performance indicators. Indicators such as income levels, unemployment rates, housing stability, and access to health services paint a comprehensive picture of the lived realities of communities. Likewise, educational performance indicators, including graduation rates, standardized test scores, and access to advanced coursework, offer concrete evidence of the disparities in educational outcomes. These locations are selected due to their historical and ongoing experiences of educational inequity, making them critical sites for investigating the impact of systemic racism on educational opportunities. The selection of these areas acknowledges the historical legacies of segregation, redlining, and disinvestment that have shaped the educational landscape of Chicago\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s impoverished neighborhoods. This historical context is essential for understanding the current state of educational inequity, as past policies and practices have laid the groundwork for present challenges. The ongoing experiences of educational inequity, manifested in disparities in funding, resources, and outcomes, provide a compelling case for examining how systemic racism continues to impact educational opportunities. By focusing on these areas, the research positions itself to explore the complex interplay between systemic racism and education. These communities offer critical insights into the barriers to educational equity and the potential for transformative reforms. Investigating these sites enables a deeper understanding of how systemic racism is embedded within educational policies and practices, and how it can be addressed through targeted interventions (Ladson-Billings, 2006).Research Sample/Sources of DataThe selection of participants through purposive sampling for the study is a deliberate method aimed at capturing the richness and diversity of experiences within the educational landscape of Chicago\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s Black communities. This sampling strategy is particularly suited for qualitative research, where the depth of individual and collective experiences are more informative than statistical representativeness. Through focusing on Black students, educators, and community members, the research can obtain a comprehensive understanding of the educational experiences of those most affected by systemic inequities.Diversity of Perspectives and ExperiencesThe purposive sampling strategy is designed to ensure a broad representation of views and experiences within the study\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s target population. This includes students at different educational levels, educators with varying years of experience and roles within schools (e.g., teachers, administrators, support staff), and community members who have insights into the local educational system, including parents, guardians, and local leaders. Such diversity enriches the data, by giving a fuller view of the educational disparities and potential reform initiatives.Black Students in Public SchoolsFocusing on Black students currently enrolled in public schools allows the study to directly engage with those who are experiencing the educational system\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s current state. This group is vital for understanding how educational policies, practices, and disparities impact student outcomes, aspirations, and day-to-day experiences. Students can provide firsthand accounts of their educational journey, challenges faced, and their perceptions of what changes are needed to create a more equitable educational environment.Educators in These SchoolsEducators working in the selected areas are crucial sources of data, offering professional perspectives on the systemic barriers to educational equity and the effectiveness of current reform efforts. Their experiences can shed light on the challenges of teaching in under-resourced schools, the impact of systemic racism on educational practices, and the potential for targeted reforms to improve educational outcomes for Black students. Educators\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\' insights are essential for understanding the operational aspects of educational disparities and identifying leverage points for systemic change.Community Members Residing in the Selected AreasCommunity members, including parents, guardians, and local leaders, provide an external yet intimately connected perspective on the educational system. They can offer observations on the broader socio-economic factors affecting educational equity, community-school interactions, and the historical context of educational disparities in their areas. Engaging with community members helps ground the study in the lived realities of the neighborhoods under examination, ensuring that proposed reforms are responsive to community needs and aspirations.Ensuring a Comprehensive UnderstandingThe combination of these participant groups will facilitate a comprehensive understanding of the educational landscape from multiple angles. Each group contributes unique insights that, when woven together, present a detailed picture of the challenges and opportunities for educational reform in Chicago\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s Black communities. This approach makes it so that rich data collected and that data sources align with the study\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s commitment to inclusivity and depth, honoring the complexity of the issue at hand.Data Collection MethodsThe data collection methods chosen for this study are central to its aim of exploring the lived experiences of Black communities in Chicago with respect to educational inequities. Each method—semi-structured interviews, focus groups, and participatory observations—serves a unique purpose and, when combined, offers a rich, multi-dimensional perspective on the issues at hand. These methods are designed to engage deeply with participants, eliciting detailed narratives, insights, and reflections that can inform the development of targeted educational reforms.In-depth Semi-structured InterviewsSemi-structured interviews are a foundational data collection method for this study, offering a flexible yet focused framework for exploring participants\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\' experiences and perspectives. This format allows the researcher to probe deeply into the personal narratives of Black students, educators, and community members, facilitating an understanding of their individual journeys, challenges, and aspirations within the educational system. The semi-structured nature of these interviews ensures that while certain key topics are addressed across all interviews, there is also room for participants to share their unique experiences and insights, leading to a richer dataset (Osborne & Grant-Smith, 2021).These interviews will be conducted with a carefully prepared set of open-ended questions that guide the conversation while allowing for spontaneous exploration of topics that participants deem important. This approach is particularly effective in uncovering details of how systemic racism and socioeconomic factors intersect to impact educational opportunities and outcomes.Focus GroupsFocus groups offer a complementary approach to individual interviews by facilitating dynamic discussions among participants who share similar experiences or perspectives (Morgan, 2002). These sessions are invaluable for exploring the collective perceptions of educational inequities and generating dialogue on potential reforms. Focus groups can uncover community-level insights and shared experiences that might not emerge in one-on-one interviews. They also provide a space for participants to interact with and react to each other\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s perspectives, potentially leading to a deeper exploration of issues and a more robust understanding of communal and shared experiences.The focus groups in this study will be carefully composed to ensure a comfortable and respectful environment where participants feel empowered to speak openly. Discussions will be guided by a set of themes related to the study\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s research questions but will remain flexible enough to follow the group\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s conversational flow and explore emergent topics.Participatory ObservationsParticipatory observation involves the researcher being immersed in the community and educational settings being studied, offering a direct view of the contexts and dynamics that shape educational experiences (Musante & DeWalt, 2010). This method enables the collection of data on the interactions, practices, and environments that influence educational outcomes for Black communities in Chicago. Through observing and participating in community and school activities, the researcher can gain insights into the lived realities of the study\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s participants, providing a valuable context for interpreting the findings from interviews and focus groups.Participatory observations will be conducted with an ethical commitment to respect and non-intrusion, ensuring that the presence of the researcher supports and does not disrupt the natural flow of community and educational activities. This method not only enriches the study\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s data but also deepens the researcher\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s understanding and empathy for the participants\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\' experiences.Data Analysis MethodsThe thematic analysis approach, as outlined by Braun and Clarke (2006) is a flexible framework for analyzing qualitative data. Thematic analysis can be used to identify and interpret patterns of meaning (themes) across the dataset. In the context of this study on educational reform as a form of reparations for Black communities in Chicago, thematic analysis will facilitate a deep engagement with the narratives, experiences, and insights of participants, ensuring a comprehensive understanding of the educational disparities they face.The process begins with inductive coding, where data are coded without trying to fit it into a pre-existing coding frame, or the researcher\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s analytic preconceptions. This bottom-up approach allows for the emergence of unexpected insights and themes, ensuring that the analysis is genuinely driven by the data. This phase is important for capturing the authentic voices and experiences of Black students, educators, and community members, providing a grounded basis for subsequent thematic development.The analysis is inherently iterative, with the researcher moving back and forth between the collected data and the emerging analysis. This iterative process allows for the refinement of themes, ensuring they accurately capture the complexities and nuances of the data. Such an approach helps with maintaining analytical rigor and depth, allowing for adjustments and refinements as new data are collected and as the researcher\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s understanding of the data deepens (Braun & Clarke, 2006).Integrating CRT and Reparative Justice into the thematic analysis process will help make it so that the analysis can identify themes and interpret them within the broader socio-historical and racial context. CRT gives a lens through which to view and understand the data, emphasizing the centrality of race and racism in the experiences being studied. Similarly, Reparative Justice offers a framework for identifying themes related to healing, restitution, and systemic transformation, aligning the analysis with the study\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s aim of exploring educational reform as a form of reparations.To improve the depth of the thematic analysis, the study will use several strategies, including engaging in a prolonged engagement with the data to obtain a deep familiarity; seeking feedback from peers on the coding and theme development process, and maintaining a reflexive journal to document the researcher\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s thoughts, reflections, and decisions throughout the analytical process. These steps can help to mitigate bias, enhance the credibility of the analysis, and ensure that the findings are robust, reliable, and meaningful (Braun & Clarke, 2006).Ethical ConsiderationsEthical considerations are important in research, especially in studies dealing with sensitive topics such as racial disparities and educational inequities. The study\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s commitment to ethical rigor involves several key components. The first is seeking approval from IRBs ensures that the research design meets ethical standards for protecting participants. This process involves a review of the study\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s methods and materials to ensure they do not pose undue risk to participants.Second is obtaining informed consent. Participants must be fully aware of the study\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s purpose, what their participation entails, the potential risks and benefits, and their rights as participants, including the right to withdraw at any time without penalty. This process respects participants\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\' autonomy and decision-making capacity.Third is protecting the identities of participants. Measures will be taken to ensure that data are anonymized and securely stored, with access limited to the research team. Confidentiality agreements will be in place to prevent unauthorized disclosure of sensitive information. Also, emphasizing the voluntary nature of participation is essential. Participants should feel free to engage in the study without any coercion or undue influence, ensuring that their involvement is based on their free and informed choice.Issues of TrustworthinessTrustworthiness in qualitative research is about the accuracy and credibility of the findings. Several strategies will be employed to enhance the trustworthiness of this study. First is triangulation by using multiple data sources and theoretical perspectives (triangulation). Second is member checking, which involves sharing summaries of findings with participants or allowing them to review the data and interpretations related to their contributions. Member checking serves as a form of validation, ensuring that the research accurately reflects participants\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\' experiences and perspectives. Third is keeping a reflective journal.Limitations & DelimitationsAcknowledging the limitations and delimitations of the study is crucial for understanding its scope and the applicability of its findings. The main limitation here is the approach. Qualitative research can be rich in detail and depth, but it often faces challenges related to the subjective interpretation of data and the difficulty of generalizing findings to broader populations. The interpretive nature of qualitative analysis means that findings are influenced by the researcher\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s perspectives and the specific contexts within which data were collected.Delimitations define the boundaries of the study. In this case, the focus on specific communities within Chicago limits the extent to which findings can be generalized to other contexts or populations. These delimitations are necessary to achieve the study\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s aims but also define the scope within which the findings are applicable.SummaryThis research proposal delves into the persistent educational disparities faced by Black communities in Chicago, aiming to explore the feasibility of reparations through targeted educational reforms. The study is motivated by a critical examination of how historical oppression has shaped the educational opportunities and outcomes for Black students in poverty-stricken areas of Chicago. Through a narrative-based qualitative research design, this investigation seeks to capture the lived experiences and perspectives of Black students, educators, and community members, thereby illuminating the complex interplay between historical injustices and current educational inequities.The literature review provides a foundational understanding of three primary themes: the historical roots of educational inequities, the current landscape of educational disparities, and strategies for educational reform and reparations. In situating the study within the conceptual frameworks of Critical Race Theory and Reparative Justice, it aims to address not only the symptoms but also the root causes of educational disparities, proposing solutions that are both equitable and reparative in nature.ConclusionThe significance of this research lies in its potential to contribute to the ongoing dialogue on educational equity and reparations. With its focus on the specific context of Black communities in Chicago, the study sheds light on the necessity of addressing historical injustices as a critical component of educational reform. The proposed research questions aim to fill a gap in the current body of knowledge, offering insights that could inform the development of more just and effective educational policies and practices. The findings from this research have the potential to inform not only academic discourse but also policy-making and community action, paving the way for reforms that truly address the needs and aspirations of Black communities in Chicago. Ultimately, this study aims to contribute to a broader movement towards an educational system that is equitable, inclusive, and reparative, offering a model for how targeted reforms can serve as a means of acknowledging and remedying historical injustices.ReferencesAlam, A., & Mohanty, A. (2023). Cultural beliefs and equity in educational institutions: exploring the social and philosophical notions of ability groupings in teaching and learning of mathematics. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 28(1), 2270662.Anderson, J. D. (1988). The Education of Blacks in the South, 1860-1935. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Atkinson, P., Coffey, A., & Delamont, S. (2001). A debate about our canon. Qualitative Research, 1(1), 5-21.Bloomberg, L.D. (2023). Completing your qualitative dissertation: A road map from beginning to end (5th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.Bruner, J. (1991). The narrative construction of reality. Critical Inquiry, 18(1), 1-21.Chase, S. E. (2007). Multiple lenses, approaches, voices. Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials, 57(3), 651-679.Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Sage publications.Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). The Flat World and Education: How America\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s Commitment to Equity Will Determine Our Future. New York: Teachers College Press.Delgado, R., & Stefancic, J. (2017). Critical Race Theory: An Introduction. New York: New York University Press.Kozol, J. (1991). Savage Inequalities: Children in America\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s Schools. New York: Crown Publishing Group.Ladson-Billings, G. (2006). From the Achievement Gap to the Education Debt: Understanding Achievement in U.S. Schools. Educational Researcher, 35(7), 3-12.Mathis, C. L. (2022). Higher Education Redress Statutes: A Critical Analysis of States\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\' Reparations in Higher Education. Wash. & Lee L. Rev., 79, 1829.Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. Jossey-Bass.Morgan, D. L. (2002). Focus group interviewing. Handbook of interview research: Context and method, 141, 159.Musante, K., & DeWalt, B. R. (2010). Participant observation: A guide for fieldworkers. Rowman Altamira.Osborne, N., & Grant-Smith, D. (2021). In-depth interviewing. In Methods in Urban Analysis (pp. 105-125). Singapore: Springer Singapore.Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences. Sage Publications.Rubin, J. S., Good, R. M., & Fine, M. (2020). Parental action and neoliberal education reform: Crafting a research agenda. Journal of Urban Affairs, 42(4), 492-510.Small, D. (2020, January). The hidden curriculum in public schools and its disadvantage to minority students. In International Forum of Teaching and Studies (Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 16-24). American Scholars Press, Inc..Supovitz, J. A., Hemphill, A. A., Manghani, O., & Watson, C. (2023). Cogs of inequity: How structural inequities impeded school efforts to support students and families at the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. Equity in Education & Society, 27526461231153666.Wright II, J. E., Dolamore, S., & Berry-James, R. M. (2022). What the hell is wrong with America? The truth about racism and justice for all. Journal of Public Management & Social Policy, 29(1), 2.AppendicesInformed Consent Form for Participation in Research StudyTitle of Research Study: Reparations for Black Communities in Chicago through Educational ReformResearcher Information:[Name, Position, Affiliation, Contact Information]Introduction:You are being invited to participate in a research study that explores the feasibility of educational reforms as a form of reparations for Black communities in Chicago. Before you decide whether to participate, it is important for you to understand why the research is being done and what it will involve. Please take time to read the following information carefully.Purpose of the Study:This study aims to investigate the impact of historical oppression on educational opportunities and outcomes for Black students, educators, and community members in impoverished areas of Chicago. The research seeks to explore the potential for targeted educational reforms to act as a form of reparative justice.What Does Participation Involve?If you agree to participate in this study, you will be asked to:· Participate in one or more in-depth semi-structured interviews, which will last approximately 60-90 minutes.· Potentially participate in a focus group with other participants, which will last approximately 90 minutes.· Allow for participatory observations in educational or community settings, with specific details to be agreed upon in advance.During interviews and focus groups, you will be asked about your experiences, perceptions, and opinions regarding educational opportunities, challenges, and the potential for reforms within the community. All participation is voluntary, and you may withdraw at any time without penalty.Confidentiality:Your privacy and the confidentiality of your information are of utmost importance. All information that is collected during the study will be kept confidential. Identifiable information will be anonymized in any reports or publications resulting from this study. Data will be stored securely and will only be accessible to the research team.Risks and Benefits:There are minimal risks associated with participation in this study. Discussing experiences with educational disparities may cause discomfort. If you experience discomfort, you may withdraw or choose not to answer specific questions. While there may be no direct benefits to you, your participation is valuable in contributing to our understanding of educational disparities and potential reforms in Chicago.Your Rights as a Participant:· Your participation in this study is entirely voluntary.· You may refuse to participate or withdraw at any time without consequence.· You have the right to skip any questions you prefer not to answer.Consent:I have read the above information and have received satisfactory answers to any questions I had. I understand the purpose, procedures, risks, and benefits of my participation in this study and agree to participate. I understand that I am free to withdraw at any time without penalty.By signing below, I acknowledge that I have read and understood this consent form and agree to participate in the research study.Participant\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s Name (Printed)Participant\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s Signature & DateResearcher\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s Signature & DateIf you have any questions about the study, please contact the researcher using the information provided above. Thank you for considering participation in this important research.

quality where data is gathered through interviews, surveys and observations, while quantitative study establishes its results on the basis of surveys, questionnaires and statistical data. A quantitative study "Study of Nurses' Knowledge about Palliative Care: A Quantitative Cross-sectional Survey" by Prem et al. can be compared with the qualitative study in question to understand the difference. The aim of this study is to assess the knowledge of nursing professionals about palliative care through a palliative care knowledge test (PCKT) (Prem et al., 2012).
A cross-sectional survey has been done amongst 363 nurses working in a multi-speciality hospital by using a questionnaire PCKT, unlike qualitative study done by Dykes et al. that utilized a sample of 23 Ns and 19 NAs which can be easily interviewed, questioned and observed. A general finding of the quantitative study was in agreement with the previously established facts of poorer knowledge of palliative care but…...

mla

References

Dykes, P. C., Carroll, D. L., Hurley, A. C., Benoit, A. & Middleton, B. (2009). Why Do Patients in Acute Care Hospitals Fall? Can Falls be prevented." J. Nurs Adm., 39(6), 299 -- 304.doi: 10.1097/NNA.0b013e3181a7788a. Retrieved 19 September 2016 from  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3107706/#R19 

Lobiondo-Wood, G. & Haber, J. (2014). Nursing Research: Methods and Critical Appraisal for Evidence-Based Practice. (ed. 8). Missouri: Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Retrieved 19 September 2016 fromhttps://books.google.co.in/books?id=wXWSAAAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover#v=snippet&q=grounded%20theory&f=false

Prem, V., Karvannan, H., Kumar, S. P., Karthikbabu, S., Syed, N., Sisodia, V. & Jaykumar, S. (2012). Study of Nurses' Knowledge about Palliative Care: A Quantitative Cross-sectional Survey. Indian Journal of Palliative Care, 18(2), 122-127.doi: 10.4103/0973-1075.100832

Wyse, S. E. (2011). What is the Difference Between Qualitative Research and Quantitative Research? Snap Surveys.com. Retrieved 21 September 2016 fromhttp://www.snapsurveys.com/blog/what-is-the-difference-between-qualitative-research-and-quantitative-research/

eflexivity and esearcher's Voice In Qualitative esearch
A key feature of qualitative research is that the entire research process involves reflection and the researcher has a primary role in the research. According to Watt (2007) and itchie et al. (2013), a qualitative research is done with the primary objective being to understand and get insights on human phenomena, aspects of and nature of human experiences and the dynamic nature of process-oriented elements in human live. As a result, qualitative research is interpretive and doing a qualitative research means questioning the way humans experience the world and understand better the world. Qualitative research would therefore be credited for presenting us with the plausible possibility of understanding that makes the living-experience better and improved contact with the world.

Despite the crucial role of qualitative research, this type of research doesn't involve following rules, as the case with quantitative research (Watt, 2007; Knapik, 2006). However,…...

mla

References

Eriksson, P., & Kovalainen, A. (2015). Qualitative Methods in Business Research: A Practical Guide to Social Research. Sage.

Lewis, S. (2015). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Health Promotion Practice, Vol 16, Issue 4, pp. 473 - 475

Phelan, S. K., & Kinsella, E. A. (2013). Picture this... safety, dignity, and voice -- Ethical research with children: Practical considerations for the reflexive researcher. Qualitative Inquiry, 19(2), 81-90.

Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., Nicholls, C. M., & Ormston, R. (Eds.). (2013). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. Sage.

Iceberg Attachment for Infants
The concept analysis article reviewed in this document is "Attachment icebergs: Maternal and child health nurses' evaluation of infant-caregiver attachment" by Bryant et al. This article explores salient phenomena pertaining to the concept of infant attachment. However, it analyzes this phenomena from the perspective of nurses who are observing and working with infants and caregivers. The researchers were essentially attempting to solicit information from the nurses to explicate the phenomena of infant attachment, while determining what factors proved the most influential in this occurrence. As such, the researchers were able to glean a fair amount of insight not only about infant attachment, but about how to best treat it. Additional insight was also gleaned into factors that were germane to the nurses who observed infant attachment and who attempted to mitigate it with various degrees of success.

Method of Analysis

The method of analysis revolved around qualitative analysis of…...

mla

References

Bryant, E., Ridgway, L., Lucas, S. (2016). Attachment icebergs: Maternal and child health nurses' evaluation of infant-caregiver attachment. Community Practitioner. 89(5) 34-43.

Qualitative vs. Quantitative
Social science sometimes debates differences between quantitative and qualitative. On one side, positivists argue quantitative research is objective and measurable where post-positivists argue qualitative analysis allows for a rich understanding of the situation. Although qualitative and quantitative research differ in the techniques, types of data and ethical concerns, they both have their place in psychology. Let us begin by exploring the realm of quantitative research and then move on to qualitative research.

Quantitative research is research that uses numerical measures to evaluate the world. Often, this approach is used by positivists who believe in objective measures to predict the world. This epistemology says research can and should focus only on what can be observed and measured. Following is a discussion of features of quantitative research including techniques, types of data and possible ethical concerns.

There are multiple techniques used to collect quantitative data, but all techniques will ultimately make data…...

mla

Works Cited

Bartholomew, L.M., & Horowitz, K. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology .

Monk, A.N. (1993). Mixing oil and water? Ethnography vs. experimental psychology in the study of computer-mediated communication. INTERCHI'93, 3-6.

Rusbult, C.E. (1980). Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the investment model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 16,, 172-186.

Rusbult, C.E. (1982). Exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect: Responses to dissatisfaction in romantic involvements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1230-1242.

Qualitative Business Case Study: A Discussion Business case studies are valuable educational tools used by educators, institutions, students and corporations within continuing education programs. Creating a case study or analyzing one written by a professor or executive, forces one to examine the strengths and weaknesses, successes and pitfalls of a particular business by analyzing precise situations, formulating one’s own conclusions and then making recommendations or other such inferences based on the data or predictions drawn from the data.
Case Study Design
The case study will manifest in a narrative or story-centric structure. The “main character” will be introduced early on in the case study as someone with a necessary objective or a specific but perhaps somewhat confounding choice that needs to be addressed (Schweitzer, 2015). The story of the main character remains interwoven throughout the case study design, offering necessary information about the company in question, the overall situation, and the major stakeholders…...

Qualitative research is different from quantitative research methodologies on the premise that it does not rely on numerical data. Qualitative research rely on text and image since it's a type of scientific research that seeks to provide contextual descriptions of the experiences of people regarding as specific research issue. In most cases, qualitative research methods are considered suitable in identifying intangible factors through a scientific inquiry such as socioeconomic status, religion, social norms, and ethnicity (College of Computer and Information Science, n.d.). In this regard, there are several aspects that distinguish qualitative research writing, which are brought by specific designs, steps of analysis, and data collection procedures. An understanding of these aspects of qualitative research writing helps in enhancing the effectiveness of the research process and research findings.
Salient Aspects of Qualitative Research Writing

In his discussion on qualitative research procedures, Creswell (2014) proposes ten aspects that differentiate qualitative research writing from…...

Yes, the research entitled "Ethical Implications of AI in Society" is a mixed-method study. This means that the research design incorporates both qualitative and quantitative data collection and analysis methods. The qualitative component may involve interviews, focus groups, or content analysis, while the quantitative component may include surveys, experiments, or statistical analysis. This mixed-method approach allows for a comprehensive understanding of the ethical implications of AI in society by examining different aspects of the topic from multiple perspectives.
Overall, the mixed-method research design provides a more holistic view of the ethical implications of AI in society. By combining both qualitative and....

Is the Research Entitled "Ethical Implications of AI in Society" a Mixed Method?

Introduction

Mixed methods research combines both qualitative and quantitative research methods to provide a more comprehensive understanding of a research topic. Qualitative methods emphasize understanding the subjective experiences and perspectives of individuals, while quantitative methods focus on objective data and statistical analysis. Determining whether a specific research project is a mixed method study requires examining the combination of methods used.

Review of Ethical Implications of AI in Society Research

The research study titled "Ethical Implications of AI in Society" explores the ethical considerations surrounding the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in....

Research Proposal

Title: Exploring the Factors Influencing Student Dropout Rates

1. Introduction

Student dropout rates remain a significant concern in educational systems worldwide. Students who drop out face numerous challenges, including lower earning potential, increased risk of unemployment, and reduced health outcomes. Understanding the factors that influence dropout rates is crucial to developing effective interventions and improving educational outcomes.

2. Research Questions

This research aims to explore the factors contributing to student dropout rates by investigating the following research questions:

What are the demographic, academic, and socioeconomic characteristics associated with student dropout?
How do school-related factors, such as teacher-student relationships, school climate, and academic support,....

Sure, here is an example of the methodology section for a research proposal on exploring the factors influencing student dropout rates:

Methodology:

1. Study Design:
This research will employ a quantitative research design to explore the factors influencing student dropout rates. A survey will be conducted to gather data from a sample of students who have dropped out of school. The survey will include questions about demographics, academic performance, social factors, and reasons for dropping out.

2. Sampling:
The target population for this study will be students who have dropped out of school within the past academic year. A convenience sample of 200 students will....