Parent Involvement and Student Academic Performance: A Multiple Mediational Analysis
David R. Topor, Susan P. Keane, Terri L. Shelton, and Susan D. Calkins

Numerous studies have shown a clear positive relationship between the involvement of a parent in a child's education, and the academic performance of the child. This particular study seeks to explore the mechanisms of the said association. On that front, only two potential mechanisms are taken into consideration. These, according to the authors, include; 1) the quality of the relationship between the teacher and the student, and 2) the child's perception of cognitive competence. A total of one hundred and fifty eight 7-year-olds participated in this study. The sample also included their teachers and mothers. It is important to note that data was in this case sourced from three key centers; the child, their mothers, and teachers -- with the gathering of data from the first two centers taking…...

Finally, Boothroyd (2010) suggests that because the authors of PCI do not provide guidance on how parents are defined, the assessment may not be appropriate for families with a parenting structure other than two biological parents. It seems that while the PCI is considered a valid and reliable assessment for some populations, further study should be conducted with a more diverse norming sample.
eferences

Coffman, J.K., Guerin, D.W., & Gottfried, A.W. (2006). eliability and validity of the parent-child relationship inventory (PCI): Evidence from a longitudinal cross-informant investigation. Psychological Assessment, 18(2), 209-214. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.209

Gerard, A.B.Parent-child relationship inventory Western Psychological Services, 12031 Wilshire Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90025-1251; ephone [HIDDEN]; FAX [HIDDEN]; Web: www.wpspublish.com. etrieved from http://ezproxy.library.capella.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=mmt&AN=TIP07001840&site=ehost-live&scope=site

Heinze, M.C., & Grisso, T. (1996). eview of instruments assessing parenting competencies used in child custody evaluations. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 14(3), 293-313. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0798(199622)14:33.0.CO;2-0

Schroeder, V., & Kelley, M. (2009). Associations between family environment, parenting practices, and executive…...

mla

References

Coffman, J.K., Guerin, D.W., & Gottfried, A.W. (2006). Reliability and validity of the parent-child relationship inventory (PCRI): Evidence from a longitudinal cross-informant investigation. Psychological Assessment, 18(2), 209-214. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.209

Gerard, A.B.Parent-child relationship inventory Western Psychological Services, 12031 Wilshire Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90025-1251; ephone [HIDDEN]; FAX [HIDDEN]; Web: www.wpspublish.com. Retrieved from  http://ezproxy.library.capella.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=mmt&AN=TIP07001840&site=ehost-live&scope=site 

Heinze, M.C., & Grisso, T. (1996). Review of instruments assessing parenting competencies used in child custody evaluations. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 14(3), 293-313. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0798(199622)14:33.0.CO;2-0

Schroeder, V., & Kelley, M. (2009). Associations between family environment, parenting practices, and executive functioning of children with and without ADHD. Journal of Child & Family Studies, 18(2), 227-235. doi:10.1007/s10826-008-9223-0

Parent Involvement and Student Achievement
Parental Involvement and Student Academic Achievement

TA administration and staff believe schools are seeing a decrease in parental involvement as students enter high school. Research conducted by the Kentucky Department of Education (KDE) Dropout Prevention Resource Guide (2008) has demonstrated the positive effects of parental involvement in schools.

Parental involvement in the eighth grade had a strong positive effect on the grade point average of 10th graders (Keith, T.Z., Keith, Quirk, Sperduto, Santillo, & Killings, 1998). In contrast, Balen and Moles (1994) and Hurst (2002) suggest when parents have a positive attitude regarding education and demonstrate trust that their children can do well, children perform better in school. However, parental involvement tends to decrease as students become older (p. 3).

Problem Statement

Historical and current studies have investigated the impact of parental involvement and student achievement. Diverse studies have considered how well students perform academically when their parents are involved…...

mla

On a much larger sample of children (6,400 Americans, 14-18 years old) (Steinberg, 1992) conducted within the same two years that the previous researchers had started their study (1987-1988), Steinberg et al. (1992) found that parental involvement is more likely to promote adolescent school success as long as this academic involvement occurred in the context of an authoritative home environment.

This study was structured so as to examine long-term parenting style, including parental academic involvement with school performance in a sample of high school youth. Nine high schools from Wisconsin and North California were used in this study (Steinberg, 1992). Diversity was achieved as far as possible between different communities, ethnic population, family structures, and socioeconomic status levels. Self-report surveys were filled out by the students on two days of survey administration during the schools years of 1987-1988 and of 1988-1989 (Hill, 2004). In this case, I agree with the emphasis on self-reporting but the analytical framework, again, needs to be much stronger for truly measuring student perceptions as that is where the core of the mechanisms emerges.

The standard active consent form for ethical procedures was not used here since studies have shown that it would screen out individuals with possibly disengaged parents and it was precisely these individuals whom the researchers wished to include. Their procedure, therefore, was to request active consent from adolescents and passive consent from parents

Parent Involvement
When it comes to children and how well they do (or do not do) in schools, a lot of the invective and scrutiny is directed towards the teachers at the school and the administrators that govern the same. Whether it be parents showing disdain for how well the students are not doing or whether it be national laws such as No Child Left Behind, the teachers seem to shoulder a lot of the blame when students do not perform as expected or desired. However, to just blame the teachers would be unwise because they are only part of equation and some would argue that teachers are not even the biggest part of the equation. While having adept teachers imparting knowledge to students is important, having parents or guardians of those children that are involved and engaged is even more important.

esearch

One of the linchpins of student success has been determined…...

mla

References

Harji, M. B., Balakrishnan, K., & Letchumanan, K. (2016). SPIRE Project: Parental Involvement

in Young Children's ESL Reading Development. English Language Teaching, 9(12), 1-

15.

Hemmerechts, K., Agirdag, O., & Kavadias, D. (2017). The relationship between parental

There are many of these individuals, and it is time that this is changed.
Parents often look away from these kinds of problems, or they spend their time in denial of the issue because they feel that their child will not be harmed by parental involvement with drugs or alcohol. Some parents have parents that were/are addicts themselves, and some are so busy with their lives that they do not actually realize that their child has any kind of problem with the lifestyle of the parent until it becomes so severe that it cannot be overlooked, or until it is brought to their attention by police, the school, or someone else that has seen it first hand. Parents are not the only ones that overlook this issue, though.

Sometimes siblings and friends also see problems that they ignore, do not understand, or do not talk to anyone about, and the school…...

mla

Bibliography

Aleman-Padilla, L. 2002. Babies First gets last word on infant care Hundreds recognize groups contribution at fourth annual event. The Fresno Bee.

Anderson, D. 2004. Funding cuts impact health services. Precinct Reporter.

Anderson, S.A. (2000). How parental involvement makes a difference in reading achievement. Reading Improvement.

Baker, P.L. (2000). I didn't know: discoveries and identity transformation of women addicts in treatment. Journal of Drug Issues, 30, 863-881.

For example, Leventhal (2001) analyzed different intervention methodology and implementation of home-based services aimed at preventing abuse and neglect as well as promoting the health and development of the infant and mother, by specifically looking at the Healthy Families Olds' models.
Kass and colleagues (2003) from Fight Crime: Invest in Kids argue that the cycle of violence can be prevented with intervention methods including parenting education. oberts, Wolman and Harris-Looby (2004, p. 101) state that "teaching students parenting skills may be the most cost-effective way to reduce violent and abusive behaviors and prevent the transfer of violent behaviors from generation to generation." They found that for less than $1,000, Project Baby Care, a parental training program developed for adolescents proved successful in improving parental knowledge and skills and attitudes toward caring for an infant.

Another study (Hughs & Gottlieb, 2004), regarding the effects of the Webster-Stratton parenting program on parenting skills…...

mla

References

Belsky, J. & Vondra, J. (1989), 'Lessons from child abuse: The determinants of parenting', in D. Cicchetti & V. Carlson (Eds), Child Maltreatment: Theory and Research on the Causes and Consequences of Child Abuse and Neglect, New York: Cambridge University Press, 153-202.

Chalk, R. & King, P.A. (Eds) (1998), Violence in Families: Assessing Prevention and Treatment Programs, Washington DC: National Academy Press,

Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) (U.S.), Administration on Children, Youth, and Families (ACF). Child maltreatment 2003. Washington (DC): Government Printing Office; 2005. Website retrieved May 10, 2007 www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/pubs/cm03/index.htm.

Fine, M.J. (1980), Handbook on Parent Education, Academic Press, New York.

Family Involvement at School
I enjoy working with the students at my school tremendously. At the K-8 school in Borough Park Brooklyn NY, there are largely Chinese and Hispanic demographics. Working with students and parents is what will prove crucial in improving the academic success of the students.

There are a number of things that are happening at my school in regards to family-involvement that are really making me excited for the improvement of the students' academic success. A lot of my Chinese-American students do get a lot of parent involvement at home. I hear from the students that their parents help them with daily homework and even push them to go beyond that day's lesson in order to prepare for the next upcoming lessons. In fact, I do see a heightened level of at-home parent involvement with the Chinese-American students, probably more so than any other demographic of students at the…...

Like Mr. Johnson, he acknowledged that student behavior was different "back then" when he was in school: "Some of the things I've seen here with kids never really occurred in my time" (personal communication, January 26, 2011).
In keeping with his enthusiastic responses about Springfield Gardens, Mr. Benton was pleased to discuss the school and its community relations. He cited a technology program for grandparents offered once or twice a week at the school, involvement by congressmen and elected officials -- although he did not provide details how that is manifest -- and after-school programs conducted through the auspices of the YMCA, an organization with which he himself is active. He believes there is a considerable effort underway, although there is still more to do.

Principal Gordon was much more cautious in his enthusiasm. He acknowledged that the YMCA program provided support five days a week and reported a good relationship…...

mla

References

I.S. 059 Springfield Gardens. (2011). Our mission. Retrieved from  http://schools.nyc.gov/School 

Portals/29/Q059/AboutUs/Overview/Our+Mission.htm

I.S. 059 Springfield Gardens. (2011). Statistics. Retrieved from

Only after this a further section returns to the fact of the lack of research involving father involvement and how this is influenced by child characteristics.
Once the document turns to the investigation and methods to be used, the presentation of information becomes more logical and academically stronger. The research questions are for example pertinently mentioned in "The Present Study" section. The questions directly pertain to the issue previously indicated, i.e. The parenting involvement of fathers, and how this is influenced by children and various aspects in their character.

In the "Method" section, I noticed that participants were mainly homogeneous in terms of race and age. No specific reason was given for this, but I presume it is for the purpose of consistency, as cultural values and social status would probably influence the parenting paradigm. In this way, I believe the study provides a valuable springboard for futher studies in other…...

eluctance of Parents to Visit the School
ole of Parents in Children's Education

Education has always been a very important part of human existence and has been an inseparable part of human civilization. There has been a lot of development on the education portal and mankind has learned great deal from the education function (Jeynes, 2005). Every milestone which is achieved and every development which is made in any direction is due to the knowledge provided through education. This function has been researched and is very much detailed in terms of style and method. Several researchers and experts have proposed and devised methods which can make education and knowledge imparting more effective and efficient (Hill & Tyson, 2009). Talking about a student at elementary level, it is all the more important to understand the needs of such young individuals and analyze the education function accordingly (Tschannen-Moran and Hoy, 2007). This paper discusses…...

mla

References

Jeynes, W.H. (2005).A metaanalysis of the relation of parental involvement to urban elementary school student academic achievement. Urban Education. 40(3), 237-269.

Stewart, E.B. (2008). School structural characteristics, student effort, peer associations, and parental involvement: The influence of school and individual level factors on academic achievement. Education and Urban Society, 40(2), 179-204.

Hill, N.E. & Tyson, D.F. (2009). Parental involvement in middle school: a met analytic assessment of the strategies that promote achievement. Developmental Psychology, 49(3), 740-763.

Hill, N., and Taylor, L. (2004). Parental school involvement and children's academic achievement: Pragmatics and issues. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(4) 161-164.

Parents\\\' Perspective on why they choose to send their children to Private Schools. Why are more and more parents choosing private schools over public schools in Ontario?IntroductionOver the years, private schools have been playing a vital role in the education sector in Ontario. This has been notable over the last decade as new private schools are being built and the rising number of parents sending their children to private facilities. As the number of private schools increases, the reasons for children\\\'s transfer from public schools increase (Brown, 2020). In Ontario, Canada, Public Schools are divided into three categories: early childhood education, elementary school, and secondary school. The schools are funded through a provincial method (owe & Berry, 2020). They are governed by the Ministry of Education, as per the Education Act. The Ministry is responsible for setting the regional curriculum, equal distribution of funds to schools depending on the number…...

mla

ReferencesBrown, D. W. (2020). Social Darwinism, Private Schooling and Sport in Victorian and Edwardian Canada 1 (pp. 215-230). Routledge.Flick, U. (Ed.). (2017). The Sage handbook of qualitative data collection. Sage.Heeringa, S. G., West, B. T., & Berglund, P. A. (2017). Applied survey data analysis. Chapman and Hall/CRC.Milian, R. P., & Quirke, L. (2017). Crafting legitimate identities: Promotional strategies in the Ontario non-elite private school sector. Educational Studies, 53(4), 342-358.Rowe, E., & Perry, L. B. (2020). Inequalities in the private funding of public schools: parent financial contributions and school socioeconomic status. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 52(1), 42-59.Sileyew, K. J. (2019). Research design and methodology. In Cyberspace. IntechOpen.

MILITAY DEPLOYED PAENT PECEPTIONS OF INVOLVEMENT IN THE EDUCATION OF THEI CHILDEN: A PHENOMENOLOGICAL STUDYbyEder G. BennettLiberty UniversityA Dissertation Presented in Partial FulfillmentOf the equirements for the DegreeDoctor of EducationLiberty University2021MILITAY DEPLOYED PAENT PECEPTIONS OF INVOLVEMENT IN THE EDUCATION OF THEI CHILDEN: A PHENOMENOLOGICAL STUDYby Eder G. BennettA Dissertation Presented in Partial FulfillmentOf the equirements for the DegreeDoctor of EducationAPPOVED BY:James Eller, Ed.D., Committee ChairMichael-Chadwell Sharon, Ed.D., Committee MemberAbstractThe purpose of this qualitative transcendental phenomenological study was to explore the perceptions and lived experiences of deployed military parents regarding active involvement in their childs education. The research question was: What are the perceptions of deployed military parents regarding active involvement in their childs education? The methodology included using a qualitative phenomenological research design, applying Epstein\\\'s theory regarding the triangle relationship between parents, teachers, and the community to help explore and make sense of the stories and experiences of parents who…...

mla

ReferencesAlfano, C. A., Lau, S., Balderas, J., Bunnell, B. E., & Beidel, D. C. (2016). The impact of military deployment on children: Placing developmental risk in context. Clinical Psychology Review, 43, 17-29.Allen, D. C. (2015). Research, when you know what you’re doing: A review of essentials of qualitative inquiry. The Qualitative Report, 20(4), 451-453.Amineh, R. J., & Asl, H. D. (2015). Review of constructivism and social constructivism. Journal of Social Sciences, Literature, and Languages, 1(1), 9-16.Anney, V. N. (2014). Ensuring the quality of the findings of qualitative research: Looking at trustworthiness criteria. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies (JETERAPS), 5(2), 272-281.Appel, H., Gerlach, A. L., & Crusius, J. (2016). The interplay between Facebook use, social comparison, envy, and depression. Current Opinion in Psychology, 9, 44-49.Bandura, A. (2018). Toward a psychology of human agency: Pathways and reflections. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(2), 130-136.Bello?Utu, C. F., & DeSocio, J. E. (2015). Military deployment and reintegration: A systematic review of child coping. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing, 28(1), 23-34.Benner, A. D., Boyle, A. E., & Sadler, S. (2016). Parental involvement and adolescents’ educational success: The roles of prior achievement and socioeconomic status. Journal of youth and adolescence, 45(6), 1053-1064.Bennett, J. (2018). Combating sexual assault with the military ethic: Exploring culture, military institutions, and norms-based preventive policy. Armed Forces & Society, 44(4), 707-730.Bolles, E., & Patrizio, K. (2016). Leadership tenets of military veterans working as school administrators. Journal of Leadership Education, 15(3), 98-116.Bondy, E., Ross, D. D., Gallingane, C., & Hambacher, E. (2007). Creating environments of success and resilience: Culturally responsive classroom management and more. Urban Education, 42(4), 326-348.Brownfield, D., & Thompson, K. (1991). Attachment to peers and delinquent behavior. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 33, 45.Burton, N. W., Pakenham, K. I., & Brown, W. J. (2010). Feasibility and effectiveness of psychosocial resilience training: A pilot study of the READY program. Psychology, Health, and Medicine, 15(3), 266-277.Carey, M. A., & Asbury, J. E. (2016). Focus group research. Routledge.Castro, M., Expósito-Casas, E., López-Martín, E., Lizasoain, L., Navarro-Asencio, E., & Gaviria, J. L. (2015). Parental involvement on student academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational research review, 14, 33-46.Chang, R. (2017). Genevra Walters: How tech can close the achievement gap: Students who struggle need more technology, not less. THE Journal (Technological Horizons in Education), 44(1), 12.Cheng, C. C. & Huang, K. H. (2018). Education reform and teacher agency. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 76(3), 286-287.Chester, J., & Montgomery, K. (2008). No escape: Marketing to kids in the digital age. Multinational Monitor, 29(1), 11.Conforte, A. M., Bakalar, J. L., Shank, L. M., Quinlan, J., Stephens, M. B., Sbrocco, T., & Tanofsky-Kraff, M. (2017). Assessing military community support: Relations among perceived military community support, child psychosocial adjustment, and parent psychosocial adjustment. Military Medicine, 182(9-10), e1871-e1878.Cozza, S. J., Knobloch, L. K., Gewirtz, A. H., DeVoe, E. R., Gorman, L. A., Flake, E. M., ... & Lerner, R. M. (2018). Lessons learned and future recommendations for conducting research with military children and families. In A Battle Plan for Supporting Military Families (pp. 265-287). Springer, Cham.Creswell, J. (2003). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches.  California: Sage Publication.Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. CA: Sage.Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.Dahlman, H. (2013, September/October). The journey toward cross-cultural competence is never-ending. Momentum, 44(3), 27-31.De Pedro, K. T., Astor, R. A., Gilreath, T. D., Benbenishty, R., & Berkowitz, R. (2018). School climate, deployment, and mental health among students in military-connected schools. Youth & Society, 50(1), 93-115.DeVoe, E. R. (2017). Supporting military families with young children throughout the deployment lifecycle. Boston: Trustees of Boston University.DeVoe, E. R., Paris, R., Emmert-Aronson, B., Ross, A., & Acker, M. (2017). A randomized clinical trial of a post-deployment parenting intervention for service members and their families with very young children. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 9(S1), 25.Doge, P. & Keller, H. (2014, July-September). Similarity of mothers\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\' and preschool teachers\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\' evaluations of socialization goals in a cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 28(3), 377-381.Epstein, J. L., Sanders, M. G., Sheldon, S. B., Simon, B. S., Salinas, K. C., Jansorn, N. R., ... & Hutchins, D. J. (2018). School, family, and community partnerships: Your handbook for action. City: Corwin Press.Ellison, T. L. & Evans, J. N. (2016, Fall). Minecraft, teachers, parents, and learning: What they need to know and understand. School Community Journal, 26(2), 25-30.Eskreis-Winkler, L., Duckworth, A. L., Shulman, E. P., & Beal, S. (2014). The grit effect: Predicting retention in the military, the workplace, school, and marriage. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 36.Espinosa, E. M., Sorensen, J. R., & Lopez, M. A. (2013). Youth pathways to placement: The influence of gender, mental health need, and trauma on confinement in the juvenile justice system. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 42(12), 1824-1836.Fosnot, C. T. (2013). Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice. Teachers College Press.Francis Howell School District. (2018). Epstein’s 6 types of parent involvement. Retrieved from on 6 June 2019Freberg, K., Graham, K., McGaughey, K., & Freberg, L. A. (2011). Who are the social media influencers? A study of public perceptions of personality. Public Relations Review, 37(1), 90-92.Gangai, K. N. (2014). Absenteeism at workplace: What are the factors influencing it? International Journal of Organizational Behavior & Management Perspectives, 3(4), 1258-1265.Gardner, G. (2001). Unreliable memories and other contingencies: problems with biographical knowledge. Qualitative research, 1(2), 185-204.Glassman, M., & Kang, M. J. (2016). Teaching and learning through open-source educative processes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 281-290.Graham-Clay, S. (2009, Spring). Communicating with parents: Strategies for teachers. School Community Journal, 15(1), 117-121.Henderson, M., Selwyn, N., & Aston, R. (2017). What works and why? Student perceptions of ‘useful’ digital technology in university teaching and learning. Studies in Higher Education, 42(8), 1567-1579.Herrera, C., Grossman, J. B., Kauh, T. J., & McMaken, J. (2011). Mentoring in schools: An impact study of Big Brothers Big Sisters school?based mentoring. Child Development, 82(1), 346-361.Hoffding, S., & Martiny, K. (2016). Framing a phenomenological interview: What, why, and how. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 15(4), 539-564.Husserl, E. (1999). The essential Husserl: Basic writings in transcendental phenomenology. Indiana University Press.Katsirikou, A., & Lin, C. S. (2017). Revealing the “Essence” of things: Using phenomenology in LIS research. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries, 2(4), 469-478.Kelley, M. L., White, T. D., Milletich, R. J., Hollis, B. F., Haislip, B. N., Heidt, E. K., & Henson, J. M. (2016). Youth emotional reactivity, interparental conflict, parent hostility, and worrying among children with substance-abusing parents. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25(3), 1024-1034.Knobloch, L. K., Knobloch-Fedders, L. M., Yorgason, J. B., Ebata, A. T., & McGlaughlin, P. C. (2017). Military children’s difficulty with reintegration after deployment: A relational turbulence model perspective. Journal of Family Psychology, 31(5), 542.Koon-Magnin, S., Bowers, D., Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., & Arata, C. (2016). Social learning, self-control, gender, and variety of violent delinquency. Deviant Behavior, 37(7), 824-836.Kuper, A., Lingard, L., & Levinson, W. (2008, September 20). Qualitative research: Critically appraising qualitative research. BMJ, 337, 687–689. Doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1035Lester, P., Aralis, H., Sinclair, M., Kiff, C., Lee, K. H., Mustillo, S., & Wadsworth, S. M. (2016). The impact of deployment on parental, family, and child adjustment in military families. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 47(6), 938-949.Listwan, S. J. (2013). Introduction to juvenile justice. San Diego, CA: Bridgepoint.Loprinzi, C. E., Prasad, K., Schroeder, D. R., & Sood, A. (2011). Stress Management and Resilience Training (SMART) program to decrease stress and enhance resilience among breast cancer survivors: a pilot randomized clinical trial. Clinical breast cancer, 11(6), 364-368.MacDermid Wadsworth, S., Bailey, K. M., & Coppola, E. C. (2017). US military children and the wartime deployments of family members. Child Development Perspectives, 11(1), 23-28.Mahuro, G. M., & Hungi, N. (2016). Parental participation improves student academic achievement: A case of Iganga and Mayuge districts in Uganda. Cogent Education, 3(1), 1264170.Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2014). Designing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Merriam, S. B., & Grenier, R. S. (Eds.). (2019). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. John Wiley & Sons.Moeller, J. D., Culler, E. D., Hamilton, M. D., Aronson, K. R., & Perkins, D. F. (2015). The effects of military-connected parental absence on the behavioral and academic functioning of children: A literature review. Journal of Children\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s Services, 10(3), 291-306.Moll, L. (ed). (1990). Vygotsky and education. Cambridge University Press.Moustakas, C. (1990). Heuristic research: Design, methodology, and applications. Sage Publications.Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Neuendorf, K. A. (2016). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Neuman, W. L. (2008). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches, 6th ed. New York: Allyn & Bacon.Nicosia, N., Wong, E., Shier, V., Massachi, S., & Datar, A. (2017). Parental deployment, adolescent academic and social-behavioral maladjustment, and parental psychological well-being in military families. Public Health Reports, 132(1), 93-105.Nicosia, N., Wong, E., Shier, V., Massachi, S., & Datar, A. (2017). Parental deployment, adolescent academic and social-behavioral maladjustment, and parental psychological well-being in military families. Public Health Reports, 132(1), 93-105.Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1609406917733847.Nunez J. C., Suarez, N., Rosário, P., Vallejo, G., Valle, A., & Epstein, J. L. (2015). Relationships between perceived parental involvement in homework, student homework behaviors, and academic achievement: differences among elementary, junior high, and high school students. Metacognition and learning, 10(3), 375-406.O’Nyumba, T., Wilson, K., Derrick, C. J., & Mukherjee, N. (2018). The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 9(1), 20-32.O\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'Neal, C. W., Mallette, J. K., & Mancini, J. A. (2018). The importance of parents\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\' community connections for adolescent well?being: An examination of military families. American Journal of Community Psychology, 61(1-2), 204-217.Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Perkins-Gough, D. (2013). The significance of grit: A conversation with Angela Lee Duckworth. Educational Leadership, 71(1), 14-20.Perry, B. D. (2006). The boy who was raised as a dog and other stories from a child psychiatrist\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s notebook: What traumatized children can teach us about loss, love, and healing. New York, NY: Basic Books. Peters, M. D., Godfrey, C. M., Khalil, H., McInerney, P., Parker, D., & Soares, C. B. (2015). Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 13(3), 141-146.Pexton, S., Farrants, J., & Yule, W. (2018). The impact of fathers’ military deployment on child adjustment. The support needs of primary school children and their families separated during active military service: A pilot study. Clinical child psychology and psychiatry, 23(1), 110-124.Powers, R. (2018). United States military installation profiles. Retrieved from http://usmilitary.about.com on 6 June 2019Project Implicit. (2018). Results. Retrieved from https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/Study?tid=-1  on 6 June 2019RAND Corporation. (2012). How do soldiers’ deployments affect children\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s academic performance and behavioral health? Retrieved from  https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9651/index1.html  on 6 June 2019Reivich, K. J., Seligman, M. E., & McBride, S. (2011). Master resilience training in the USArmy. American Psychologist, 66(1), 25.Robertson-Kraft, C., & Duckworth, A. L. (2014). True grit: Trait-level perseverance and passion for long-term goals predict effectiveness and retention among novice teachers. Teachers College Record, 116(3).Roepke, A. M., & Seligman, M. E. (2016). Depression and prospection. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 55(1), 23-48.Rosenthal, M. (2016). Qualitative research methods: Why, when, and how to conduct interviews and focus groups in pharmacy research. Currents in pharmacy teaching and learning, 8(4), 509-516.Rule, P. & John, V.M. (2015). A necessary dialogue: Theory in case study research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 3(8), 1-11. Sandoz, E.K. & Moyer, D. N. (2015, October). Psychological flexibility as a framework for understanding and improving family reintegration following military deployment. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 41(4), 495-499.Seligman, M. (2018). PERMA and the building blocks of well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 13(4), 333-335.Shankar, K., Hakken, D., & Østerlund, C. (2017). Rethinking artifacts. The handbook ofscience and technology studies, 59-85.Shriner, B & M. Shriner. (2014). Essentials of lifespan development: A topicalperspective. Bridgepoint Education: San Diego, CA.Silverman, D. (2016). Qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Slavin, R. E. (2019). Educational psychology: Theory and practice. Pearson.Smith, P. L., & McSweeney, J. (2017). Organizational perspectives of nurse executives in 15 hospitals on the impact and effectiveness of rapid response teams. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 43(6), 289-298. doi:10.1016/j.jcjq.2017.01.006Spitzer, B., & Aronson, J. (2015). Minding and mending the gap: Social psychological interventions to reduce educational disparities. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(1), 1-18.Stetson, R., Stetson, E., Sinclair, B. & Nix, K. (2012). Home visits: Teacher reflections about relationships, student behavior, and achievement. Issues in Teacher Education, 21(1), 21-37.Tempski, P., Santos, I. S., Mayer, F. B., Enns, S. C., Perotta, B., Paro, H. B.,&Guimaraes, K. B. (2015). Relationship among medical student resilience, educational environment, and quality of life. PLoS One, 10(6), e0131535.Theron, L. C., Liebenberg, L. A., & Ungar, M. (2015). Youth resilience and culture.Springer Netherlands.Thompson, B. C., Mazer, J. P., & Flood Grady, E. (2015). The changing nature ofparent-teacher communication: Mode selection in the smartphone era. Communication Education, 64(2), 187-207.Tough, P. (2013). how children succeed: Grit, curiosity, and the hidden power of character. NY: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Trier, K. A., Pappas, D., Bovitz, B., & Augustyn, M. (2018). Supporting development during military deployment and after. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 39(5), 447-449.Trautmann, J., Alhusen, J., & Gross, D. (2015). Impact of deployment on military families with young children: A systematic review. Nursing Outlook, 63(6), 656-679.Trautman, J. & Ho, G. W. (2018, July). Parenting needs among mothers of young childrenduring military deployment. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 50(4), 392.Turner, D. W. (2010). Qualitative interview design: A practical guide for novice investigatorsThe qualitative report, 15(3), 754-760.Turner, H. A., Finkelhor, D., Hamby, S., & Henly, M. (2017). Victimization and adversityamong children experiencing war-related parental absence or deployment in a nationally representative US sample. Child abuse & neglect, 67, 271-279.United States Department of Defense (n.d.). Educator’s guide to the military child during deployment. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/os/homefront/homefront.pdf on 6 June 2019VA. (2020). What is deployment. Retrieved from  https://www.mentalhealth.va.gov/communityproviders/docs/deployment_operational_experiences.pdf Vaillant, G. E. (2000). Adaptive mental mechanisms: Their role in Oa positive psychology. American psychologist, 55(1), 89.Vijaya, Vijaya, & Rajeshkumar (2016). Parental involvement and academic achievement among high school students. Review of Research, 5(12), 11-14. Von Culin, K. R., Tsukayama, E., & Duckworth, A. L. (2014). Unpacking grit: Motivational correlates of perseverance and passion for long-term goals. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 9(4), 306-312.Webster, D., & Rivers, N. (2018). Resisting resilience: Disrupting discourses of self-efficacy. Pedagogy, Culture, & Society, 1-13.Whyte, K. L., & Karabon, A. (2016). Transforming teacher-family relationships: Shifting roles and perceptions of home visits through the funds of knowledge approach. Early Years, 36(2), 207-221.Wright, K. B. & Shields, S.M. (2018, Spring/Summer). The effects of teacher home visits on student behavior, student academic achievement, and parent involvement. School Community Journal, 28(1), 67.Yazan, B. (2015). Three approaches to case study methods in education: Yin, Merriam, and Stake. The Qualitative Report, 20(2), 134-152.Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Yüksel, P., & Y?ld?r?m, S. (2015). Theoretical frameworks, methods, and procedures for conducting phenomenological studies in educational settings. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 6(1), 1-20. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271833455_Theoretical_Frameworks_Methods_and_Procedures_for_Conducting_Phenomenological_Studies_in_Educational_SettingsAppendix A: Irb Approval Letter SEEKING VOLUNTEERS FOR A RESEARCH STUDYThe purpose of study: To explore the experiences of deployed military parents regarding active involvement in their child’s education. Participation Requirements:To participate in the study, you must currently be deployed or previously deployed within the past two years and have pre-K-12 school-aged children that are enrolled in a school outside of the homeParticipation in this study involves:1. Face-to-Face interview or online interview with the researcher (approximately 45-60 minutes). Interviews will be audio-recorded, but pseudonyms will be used to maintain confidentiality.1. Online focus group with several other participants. The session will be recorded for transcription. Pseudonyms will be used to maintain confidentiality1. Artifact for Analysis: Participants will be asked to provide relevant artifacts (if available) for analysis. Pseudonyms will be used to maintain confidentiality.To find out more information about this study, please contact Eder Bennett at:Phone: (860) 213-4464Email: Study Title: Military Deployed Parents’ Perceptions Of Involvement In The Education Of Their Children While Deployed.Principal Investigator: Eder Bennett Research Study: Perception of Involvement in Childs EducationContact: Eder BennettPhone: (860) 213-4464 Research Study: Perception of Involvement in Childs EducationContact: Eder BennettPhone: (860) 213-4464 Research Study: Perception of Involvement in Childs EducationContact: Eder BennettPhone: (860) 213-4464 Research Study: Perception of Involvement in Childs EducationContact: Eder BennettPhone: (860) 213-4464 Research Study: Perception of Involvement in Childs EducationContact: Eder BennettPhone: (860) 213-4464 Research Study: Perception of Involvement in Childs EducationContact: Eder BennettPhone: (860) 213-4464 Research Study: Perception of Involvement in Childs EducationContact: Eder BennettPhone: (860) 213-4464 Research Study: Perception of Involvement in Childs EducationContact: Eder BennettPhone: (860) 213-4464 Research Study: Perception of Involvement in Childs EducationContact: Eder BennettPhone: (860) 213-4464 Appendix B: Recruitment FlyerAppendix C: Informed ConsentCONSENT FORMMILITARY DEPLOYED PARENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF INVOLVEMENT IN THE EDUCATION OF THEIR CHILDREN: A PHENOMENOLOGICAL STUDYEder G. BennettLiberty UniversitySchool of EducationGeneral Overview of Study: You are invited to be in a research study investigating the perceptions of deployed military parents regarding active involvement in their child’s education. You were selected as a possible participant because you are currently deployed or previously deployed and have pre-K-12 school-aged children currently enrolled in school. Please read this form and ask any questions you may have before agreeing to be in the study.Eder G. Bennett, a doctoral candidate in the School of Education at Liberty University, is conducting this study.Background Information: The purpose of this study is to explore the perceptionsand lived experiences of deployed military parents regarding active involvement in their child’s education. This will provide a foundation of understanding that can assist educational stakeholders and the military community in filling the void created by a deployed parent with the goal tohelp the student of the deployed parent.Procedures: If you consent to be a part of this study, you will be asked to do the following:1. Complete a questionnaire that includes preliminary demographic data, such as age, race, military affiliation, and years of service. The questionnaire will also consist of three open-ended questions and should take approximately 30 minutes to complete2. Participate in a face-to-face or online interview with the researcher. Interviews will be conducted in a predesignated location (chosen by you). Each interview will last for approximately 45-60 minutes. Interviews will be audio-recorded, but pseudonyms will be used to maintain confidentiality.3. Participate in an online focus group through which several prepared questions will be answered. Participants will be gathered in an online forum for 45-60 minutes using videoconferencing software such as ZOOM. The online session will be recorded for transcription. Pseudonyms will be used to maintain confidentiality.4. Provide relevant artifacts for analysis: You will be asked to provide (if available) artifacts such as journals, letters, and email correspondence with teachers pertaining to your children. These artifacts will be analyzed to gain further insight into the issues that deployed parents face. Pseudonyms will be used to maintain confidentiality.Risks: The risks involved in this study are minimal and are no more than what participants encounter in everyday life. If you experience discomfort while taking part in this study, you may choose to stop participating at any time.Benefits: The direct benefits participants should expect to receive from taking part in this study will be understanding the perceptions of other deployed military parents regarding active involvement in their child’s education. Though your participation may have potential benefits to education and the military community, you may not receive any direct benefits from your involvement. Compensation: Participants will not be compensated for participating in this study.Confidentiality: The records of this study will be kept private. In any sort of report, I might publish, I will not include any information that will make it possible to identify a subject. Research records will be stored securely, and only the researcher will have access to the artifacts. I may sharedata I collect from you in future research studies or with other researchers; however,in such an event, I will remove any information that could identify you, if applicable.1. Procedures will be taken to protect the privacy of all participants, including the use of assigned pseudonyms and interviews conducted in locations where others will not easily overhear the conversation.2. Data will be stored on a password-protected computer, and all documents will be kept in a locked file cabinet. Data may be used in future presentations.3. The researcher will transcribe interviews. Recordings will be stored on a password-locked computer for three years and then erased. Only the researcher will have access to these recordings.4. I cannot assure participants that other members of the online focus group will not share what was discussed with persons outside of the group.Voluntary Nature of the Study: Participation in this study is voluntary. Your decision to participate will not affect your current or future relations with Liberty University or your positions in the military. If you decide to participate, you are free not to answer any question or withdraw at any time without affecting those relationships.How to Withdraw from the Study: If you choose to withdraw from the study, please contact the researcher at the email address/phone number included in the next paragraph. Should you decide to withdraw, data collected from you, apart from focus group data, will be destroyed immediately and will not be included in this study. Focus group data will not be destroyed, but your contributions to the focus group will not be included in the study if you choose to withdraw.Contacts and Questions: The researcher conducting this study is Eder G. Bennett. You may ask any questions you have now. If you have questions later, you are encouraged to contact him at (860) 213-4464 or [email protected] you would like to address questions or concerns to someone other than the researcher;you are encouragedto contact the researcher’s faculty chair, Dr. James Eller, at (440) 319-1794 or [email protected] of Consent: I have read and understood the above information. I have asked questions and have received answers. I consent to participate in the study. The researcher has my permission to audio-record me as part of my participation in this study.Signature of Participant Date Signature of Investigator DateAppendix D: Recruitment LetterFall 2020Dear Service Member, As a graduate student in the School of Education at Liberty University, I am conducting research as part of the requirements for a doctoral degree in Educational Leadership. I am writing to invite you to participate in my research study about the perceptions of military parents deployed regarding their active involvement in their child’s education. You\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'re eligible to be in this study because you have been identified as having some experience with this issue. If you decide to participate in this study, you will partake in a face-to-face or online recorded interview, take part in an online focus group, and be asked to provide relevant artifacts (if available) for analysis. You should be able to complete your participation in approximately two to three weeks, with it taking four to five hours to complete all procedures. Your name and/or other identifying information will be requested as part of your participation, but the information will remain confidential.To participate, please respond to my email with your desire to be a possible participant. Following your response to participate, I will then contact you for an interview and provide the consent form for you to sign. The consent document contains additional information about my research.Sincerely,Eder G. BennettDoctoral CandidateLiberty UniversityAppendix E: QuestionnaireThe purpose of this qualitative transcendental phenomenological study is to explore the perceptionsand lived experiences of deployed military parents regarding active involvement in their child’s education. This questionnaire is designed to obtain demographic information andto capture your perceptions and experiences of being a parent while deployed overseas in the military. 1. Name: ____________________________________________________________ 2. Age: _____________ 3. Ethnicity: ______________________ 4. Branch of Service: _____________________________________________ 5. Rank: __________________________________________________ 6. Age of spouse: ____________________________________________ 7. Spouse current profession: _______________________________________8. Highest degree earned ____________________________________________________ 9. How many school age children currently in your household: _______________________ 10. How many times have you been deployed: _____________________________________?11. If currently deployed, what is the duration of your deployment: ______________________12. If not currently deployed: When was your last deployment and how long________________13. Reflect on your experiences of being a parent while deployed in the military. Please provide a brief written response to each question.1. What word best describes your initial thought about deployment as it relates to your ability to be involved in your child’s education. Please explain 1. What support (familial, financial, experience) has aided in maintaining a sense of involvement in your child’s education1. What is the number one challenge (aside from a distance) that hinders your ability to participate in a child’s education? Appendix F: Interview GuideSemi-Structured, Open-Ended Interview QuestionsCentral Research Question: What are the perceptions and lived experiences of deployed military parents regarding active involvement in their child’s education?Opening Questions 1. Please introduce yourself, describe yourself and your family 1. How long have you been serving in the military?1. In the past two years, how many times and for how long where you deployed1. What is the age and gender of your school-age child or children?1. Please explain your experience in the military thus far Questions relating to participants perceptions 1. What is your definition of parental involvement, particularly as it relates to education?1. In what way (if any) does your definition of parental involvement change while deployed1. How would you compare your role in your child’s education when not deployed and while deployed?1. What changes have you experienced in your child’s behavior, focus, and attitude towards learning while deployed?1. What are some ways or methods used to participate in your child’s education while deployed, and how do they differ from the technique used when not deployed?1. How has your deployment impacted your spouse, particularly as it relates to his/her ability to be involved in your child’s education 1. Reflect on the first time you spoke with your child about their education when you were deployed. What was that experience like? 1. Reflect on your child’s education. What is your perception of your child’s sense of how your deployment impacts his or her learning?Questions relating to participants’ perceptions of challenges1. Describe a time (while deployed) when you encountered a barrier or challenge that prevented you from being involved in their education? 1. Describe a time when you felt that you could be more involved in your children’s education while deployed. Were you able to come up with a solution? If so, please describe it. 1. How does being deployed alters your interactions with your child’s teachers and other educators 1. What stage of deployment (pre-deployment, deployment, post-deployment) do you believe creates the most challenges in attempting to stay involved in your child’s education? Please explain 1. What advice would you give a military parent who is deployed or may deploy in the futureAppendix G: Focus Group Question GuideSemi-Structured, Open-Ended Focus Group QuestionsCentral Research Question: What are the perceptions and lived experiences of deployed military parents regarding active involvement in their child’s education?Opening Questions: 1. Willeveryone please state your name, your military branch, and length of serviceQuestions Relating to Challenges Parents experience while Deployed:1. As a parent, how would you describe your overall experience of being separated from your family while deployed1. What would you identify as the most challenging aspect of being a military deployed parent?1. From a parental standpoint, what are some examples of challenges you encountered while deployed, and how have you overcome themQuestions Relating to Participants involvement:1. How has your deployment affected your child’s performance in school?1. How often and in what way do you interact with your child’s teachers or educator, what types of feedback have you received Appendix H: Participant QuestionnaireQuestions Demographic Information 1. Name:1. Age: 1. Ethnicity:1. Branch of Service1. Rank: 1. Age of spouse: 1. Spouse current profession: 1. Highest degree earned:1. How many school-age children currently in your household?1. How many times have you been deployed?1. If currently deployed, what is the duration of your deployment?1. If not currently deployed: When was your last deployment, and how long?Written Refection of experiences 1. Reflect on your experiences of being a parent while deployed in the military. Please provide a brief written response to each question.1. What word best describes your initial thought about deployment as it relates to your ability to be involved in your child’s education. Please explain?1. What support (familial, financial, experience) has aided in maintaining a sense of involvement in your child’s education?1. What is the number one challenge (aside from a distance) that hinders your ability to participate in a child’s education? Appendix I: Standardized Open-Ended Interview QuestionsQuestions Opening Questions 1. Please introduce yourself, describe yourself and your family 2. How long have you been serving in the military?3. In the past two years, how many times and for how long were you deployed?4. What is the age and gender of your school-age child or children?5. Please explain your experience in the military thus far 6. Questions relating to participants perceptions 7. What is your definition of parental involvement, particularly as it relates to education?8. In what way (if any) does your definition of parental involvement change while deployed?9. How would you compare and contrast your role in your child’s education when not deployed and while deployed?10. What changes have you experienced in your child’s behavior, focus, and attitude towards learning while deployed?11. What are some ways or methods used to participate in your child’s education while deployed, and how do they differ from the technique used when not deployed?12. How has your deployment impacted your spouse, particularly as it relates to his/her ability to be involved in your child’s education?13. Reflect on the first time you spoke with your child about their education when you were deployed. What was that experience like? 14. Reflect on your child’s education. What is your perception of your child’s sense of how your deployment impacts his or her learning?15. Questions relating to participants’ perceptions of challenges16. Describe a time (while deployed) when you encountered a barrier or challenge that prevented you from being involved in their education? 17. Describe a time when you felt that you could be more involved in your children’s education while deployed. Were you able to come up with a solution? If so, please describe it. 18. How does being deployed alters your interactions with your child’s teachers and other educators?19. What stage of deployment (pre-deployment, deployment, post-deployment) do you believe creates the most challenges in attempting to stay involved in your child’s education? Please explain 20. What advice would you give a military parent who is deployed or may deploy in the future?Appendix J: Standardized Open-Ended Focus Group QuestionsQuestions Opening Questions: 1. Will everyone please state your name, your military branch, and length of service?2. Questions Relating to Challenges Parents experience while Deployed:3. As a parent, how would you describe your overall experience of being separated from your family while deployed?4. What would you identify as the most challenging aspect of being a military deployed parent?5. From a parental standpoint, what are some examples of challenges you encountered while deployed, and how have you overcome them?Questions Relating to Participants involvement:6. How has your deployment affected your child’s performance in school?7. How often and in what way do you interact with your child’s teachers or educator? What types of feedback have you received?https://www.fhsdschools.org/UserFiles/Servers/Server_995699/File/2015-16/Parents/Epstein%20-%20Six%20Keys.pdf

MILITAY DEPLOYED PAENT PECEPTIONS OF INVOLVEMENT IN THE EDUCATION OF THEI CHILDEN: A PHENOMENOLOGICAL STUDYbyEder G. BennettLiberty UniversityA Dissertation Presented in Partial FulfillmentOf the equirements for the DegreeDoctor of EducationLiberty University2021MILITAY DEPLOYED PAENT PECEPTIONS OF INVOLVEMENT IN THE EDUCATION OF THEI CHILDEN: A PHENOMENOLOGICAL STUDYby Eder G. BennettA Dissertation Presented in Partial FulfillmentOf the equirements for the DegreeDoctor of EducationAPPOVED BY:James Eller, Ed.D., Committee ChairMichael-Chadwell Sharon, Ed.D., Committee MemberABSTACTThe purpose of this qualitative transcendental phenomenological study was to explore the perceptions and lived experiences of deployed military parents regarding active involvement in their childs education. For this purpose, this study developed an informed answer to the following research question: What are the perceptions of deployed military parents regarding active involvement in their childs education? The study used Epstein\\\'s theory regarding the triangle relationship between parents, teachers, and the community to help explore and make sense of the stories and experiences…...

mla

REFERENCESAlfano, C. A., Lau, S., Balderas, J., Bunnell, B. E., & Beidel, D. C. (2016). The impact of military deployment on children: Placing developmental risk in context. Clinical Psychology Review, 43, 17-29.Allen, D. C. (2015). Research, when you know what you’re doing: A review of essentials of qualitative inquiry. The Qualitative Report, 20(4), 451-453.Amineh, R. J., & Asl, H. D. (2015). Review of constructivism and social constructivism. Journal of Social Sciences, Literature, and Languages, 1(1), 9-16.Anney, V. N. (2014). Ensuring the quality of the findings of qualitative research: Looking at trustworthiness criteria. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies (JETERAPS), 5(2), 272-281.Appel, H., Gerlach, A. L., & Crusius, J. (2016). The interplay between Facebook use, social comparison, envy, and depression. Current Opinion in Psychology, 9, 44-49.Bandura, A. (2018). Toward a psychology of human agency: Pathways and reflections. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(2), 130-136.Bello?Utu, C. F., & DeSocio, J. E. (2015). Military deployment and reintegration: A systematic review of child coping. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing, 28(1), 23-34.Benner, A. D., Boyle, A. E., & Sadler, S. (2016). Parental involvement and adolescents’ educational success: The roles of prior achievement and socioeconomic status. Journal of youth and adolescence, 45(6), 1053-1064.Bennett, J. (2018). Combating sexual assault with the military ethic: Exploring culture, military institutions, and norms-based preventive policy. Armed Forces & Society, 44(4), 707-730.Bolles, E., & Patrizio, K. (2016). Leadership tenets of military veterans working as school administrators. Journal of Leadership Education, 15(3), 98-116.Bondy, E., Ross, D. D., Gallingane, C., & Hambacher, E. (2007). Creating environments of success and resilience: Culturally responsive classroom management and more. Urban Education, 42(4), 326-348.Brownfield, D., & Thompson, K. (1991). Attachment to peers and delinquent behavior. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 33, 45.Burton, N. W., Pakenham, K. I., & Brown, W. J. (2010). Feasibility and effectiveness of psychosocial resilience training: A pilot study of the READY program. Psychology, Health, and Medicine, 15(3), 266-277.Carey, M. A., & Asbury, J. E. (2016). Focus group research. Routledge.Castro, M., Expósito-Casas, E., López-Martín, E., Lizasoain, L., Navarro-Asencio, E., & Gaviria, J. L. (2015). Parental involvement on student academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational research review, 14, 33-46.Chang, R. (2017). Genevra Walters: How tech can close the achievement gap: Students who struggle need more technology, not less. THE Journal (Technological Horizons in Education), 44(1), 12.Cheng, C. C. & Huang, K. H. (2018). Education reform and teacher agency. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 76(3), 286-287.Chester, J., & Montgomery, K. (2008). No escape: Marketing to kids in the digital age. Multinational Monitor, 29(1), 11.Conforte, A. M., Bakalar, J. L., Shank, L. M., Quinlan, J., Stephens, M. B., Sbrocco, T., & Tanofsky-Kraff, M. (2017). Assessing military community support: Relations among perceived military community support, child psychosocial adjustment, and parent psychosocial adjustment. Military Medicine, 182(9-10), e1871-e1878.Cozza, S. J., Knobloch, L. K., Gewirtz, A. H., DeVoe, E. R., Gorman, L. A., Flake, E. M., ... & Lerner, R. M. (2018). Lessons learned and future recommendations for conducting research with military children and families. In A Battle Plan for Supporting Military Families (pp. 265-287). Springer, Cham.Creswell, J. (2003). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches.  California: Sage Publication.Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. CA: Sage.Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.Dahlman, H. (2013, September/October). The journey toward cross-cultural competence is never-ending. Momentum, 44(3), 27-31.De Pedro, K. T., Astor, R. A., Gilreath, T. D., Benbenishty, R., & Berkowitz, R. (2018). School climate, deployment, and mental health among students in military-connected schools. Youth & Society, 50(1), 93-115.DeVoe, E. R. (2017). Supporting military families with young children throughout the deployment lifecycle. Boston: Trustees of Boston University.DeVoe, E. R., Paris, R., Emmert-Aronson, B., Ross, A., & Acker, M. (2017). A randomized clinical trial of a post-deployment parenting intervention for service members and their families with very young children. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 9(S1), 25.Doge, P. & Keller, H. (2014, July-September). Similarity of mothers\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\' and preschool teachers\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\' evaluations of socialization goals in a cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 28(3), 377-381.Epstein, J. L., Sanders, M. G., Sheldon, S. B., Simon, B. S., Salinas, K. C., Jansorn, N. R., ... & Hutchins, D. J. (2018). School, family, and community partnerships: Your handbook for action. City: Corwin Press.Ellison, T. L. & Evans, J. N. (2016, Fall). Minecraft, teachers, parents, and learning: What they need to know and understand. SchoolCommunity Journal, 26(2), 25-30.Eskreis-Winkler, L., Duckworth, A. L., Shulman, E. P., & Beal, S. (2014). The grit effect: Predicting retention in the military, the workplace, school, and marriage. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 36.Espinosa, E. M., Sorensen, J. R., & Lopez, M. A. (2013). Youth pathways to placement:The influence of gender, mental health need, and trauma on confinement in the juvenile justice system. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 42(12), 1824-1836.Fosnot, C. T. (2013). Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice. Teachers College Press.Francis Howell School District. (2018). Epstein’s 6 types of parent involvement. Retrieved from on 6 June 2019Freberg, K., Graham, K., McGaughey, K., & Freberg, L. A. (2011). Who are the social media influencers? A study of public perceptions of personality. Public Relations Review, 37(1), 90-92.Gangai, K. N. (2014). Absenteeism at workplace: What are the factors influencing it? International Journal of Organizational Behavior & Management Perspectives, 3(4), 1258-1265.Gardner, G. (2001). Unreliable memories and other contingencies: problems with biographical knowledge. Qualitative research, 1(2), 185-204.Glassman, M., & Kang, M. J. (2016). Teaching and learning through open-source educative processes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 281-290.Graham-Clay, S. (2009, Spring). Communicating with parents: Strategies for teachers. School Community Journal, 15(1), 117-121.Henderson, M., Selwyn, N., & Aston, R. (2017). What works and why? Student perceptions of ‘useful’ digital technology in university teaching and learning. Studies in Higher Education, 42(8), 1567-1579.Herrera, C., Grossman, J. B., Kauh, T. J., & McMaken, J. (2011). Mentoring in schools: An impact study of Big Brothers Big Sisters school?based mentoring. Child Development, 82(1), 346-361.Hoffding, S., & Martiny, K. (2016). Framing a phenomenological interview: What, why, and how. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 15(4), 539-564.Husserl, E. (1999). The essential Husserl: Basic writings in transcendental phenomenology. Indiana University Press.Katsirikou, A., & Lin, C. S. (2017). Revealing the “Essence” of things: Using phenomenology in LIS research. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries, 2(4), 469-478.Kelley, M. L., White, T. D., Milletich, R. J., Hollis, B. F., Haislip, B. N., Heidt, E. K., & Henson, J. M. (2016). Youth emotional reactivity, interparental conflict, parent hostility, and worrying among children with substance-abusing parents. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25(3), 1024-1034.Knobloch, L. K., Knobloch-Fedders, L. M., Yorgason, J. B., Ebata, A. T., & McGlaughlin, P. C. (2017). Military children’s difficulty with reintegration after deployment: A relational turbulence model perspective. Journal of Family Psychology, 31(5), 542.Koon-Magnin, S., Bowers, D., Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., & Arata, C. (2016). Social learning, self-control, gender, and variety of violent delinquency. Deviant Behavior, 37(7), 824-836.Kuper, A., Lingard, L., & Levinson, W. (2008, September 20). Qualitative research: Critically appraising qualitative research. BMJ, 337, 687–689. Doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1035Lester, P., Aralis, H., Sinclair, M., Kiff, C., Lee, K. H., Mustillo, S., & Wadsworth, S. M. (2016). The impact of deployment on parental, family, and child adjustment in military families. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 47(6), 938-949.Listwan, S. J. (2013). Introduction to juvenile justice. San Diego, CA: Bridgepoint.Loprinzi, C. E., Prasad, K., Schroeder, D. R., & Sood, A. (2011). Stress Management and Resilience Training (SMART) program to decrease stress and enhance resilience among breast cancer survivors: a pilot randomized clinical trial. Clinical breast cancer, 11(6), 364-368.MacDermid Wadsworth, S., Bailey, K. M., & Coppola, E. C. (2017). US military children and the wartime deployments of family members. Child Development Perspectives, 11(1), 23-28.Mahuro, G. M., & Hungi, N. (2016). Parental participation improves student academic achievement: A case of Iganga and Mayuge districts in Uganda. Cogent Education, 3(1), 1264170.Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2014). Designing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Merriam, S. B., & Grenier, R. S. (Eds.). (2019). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. John Wiley & Sons.Moeller, J. D., Culler, E. D., Hamilton, M. D., Aronson, K. R., & Perkins, D. F. (2015). The effects of military-connected parental absence on the behavioral and academic functioning of children: A literature review. Journal of Children\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s Services, 10(3), 291-306.Moll, L. (ed). (1990). Vygotsky and education. Cambridge University Press.Moustakas, C. (1990). Heuristic research: Design, methodology, and applications. Sage Publications.Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Neuendorf, K. A. (2016). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Neuman, W. L. (2008). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches, 6th ed. New York: Allyn & Bacon.Nicosia, N., Wong, E., Shier, V., Massachi, S., & Datar, A. (2017). Parental deployment, adolescent academic and social-behavioral maladjustment, and parental psychological well-being in military families. Public Health Reports, 132(1), 93-105.Nicosia, N., Wong, E., Shier, V., Massachi, S., & Datar, A. (2017). Parental deployment, adolescent academic and social-behavioral maladjustment, and parental psychological well-being in military families. Public Health Reports, 132(1), 93-105.Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1609406917733847.Nunez J. C., Suarez, N., Rosário, P., Vallejo, G., Valle, A., & Epstein, J. L. (2015). Relationships between perceived parental involvement in homework, student homework behaviors, and academic achievement: differences among elementary, junior high, and high school students. Metacognition and learning, 10(3), 375-406.O’Nyumba, T., Wilson, K., Derrick, C. J., & Mukherjee, N. (2018). The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 9(1), 20-32.O\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'Neal, C. W., Mallette, J. K., & Mancini, J. A. (2018). The importance of parents\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\' community connections for adolescent well?being: An examination of military families. American Journal of Community Psychology, 61(1-2), 204-217.Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Perkins-Gough, D. (2013). The significance of grit: A conversation with Angela Lee Duckworth. Educational Leadership, 71(1), 14-20.Perry, B. D. (2006). The boy who was raised as a dog and other stories from a child psychiatrist\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s notebook: What traumatized children can teach us about loss, love, and healing. New York, NY: Basic Books. Peters, M. D., Godfrey, C. M., Khalil, H., McInerney, P., Parker, D., & Soares, C. B. (2015). Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 13(3), 141-146.Pexton, S., Farrants, J., & Yule, W. (2018). The impact of fathers’ military deployment on child adjustment. The support needs of primary school children and their families separated during active military service: A pilot study. Clinical child psychology and psychiatry, 23(1), 110-124.Powers, R. (2018). United States military installation profiles. Retrieved from http://usmilitary.about.com on 6 June 2019Project Implicit. (2018). Results. Retrieved from https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/Study?tid=-1  on 6 June 2019RAND Corporation. (2012). How do soldiers’ deployments affect children\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s academic performance and behavioral health? Retrieved from  https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9651/index1.html  on 6 June 2019Reivich, K. J., Seligman, M. E., & McBride, S. (2011). Master resilience training in the USArmy. American Psychologist, 66(1), 25.Robertson-Kraft, C., & Duckworth, A. L. (2014). True grit: Trait-level perseverance and passion for long-term goals predict effectiveness and retention among novice teachers. Teachers College Record, 116(3).Roepke, A. M., & Seligman, M. E. (2016). Depression and prospection. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 55(1), 23-48.Rosenthal, M. (2016). Qualitative research methods: Why, when, and how to conduct interviews and focus groups in pharmacy research. Currents in pharmacy teaching and learning, 8(4), 509-516.Rule, P. & John, V.M. (2015). A necessary dialogue: Theory in case study research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 3(8), 1-11. Sandoz, E.K. & Moyer, D. N. (2015, October). Psychological flexibility as a framework for understanding and improving family reintegration following military deployment. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 41(4), 495-499.Seligman, M. (2018). PERMA and the building blocks of well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 13(4), 333-335.Shankar, K., Hakken, D., & Østerlund, C. (2017). Rethinking artifacts. The handbook ofscience and technology studies, 59-85.Shriner, B & M. Shriner. (2014). Essentials of lifespan development: A topicalperspective. Bridgepoint Education: San Diego, CA.Silverman, D. (2016). Qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Slavin, R. E. (2019). Educational psychology: Theory and practice. Pearson.Smith, P. L., & McSweeney, J. (2017). Organizational perspectives of nurse executives in 15 hospitals on the impact and effectiveness of rapid response teams. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 43(6), 289-298. doi:10.1016/j.jcjq.2017.01.006Spitzer, B., & Aronson, J. (2015). Minding and mending the gap: Social psychological interventions to reduce educational disparities. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(1), 1-18.Stetson, R., Stetson, E., Sinclair, B. & Nix, K. (2012). Home visits: Teacher reflections about relationships, student behavior, and achievement. Issues in Teacher Education, 21(1), 21-37.Tempski, P., Santos, I. S., Mayer, F. B., Enns, S. C., Perotta, B., Paro, H. B.,&Guimaraes, K. B. (2015). Relationship among medical student resilience, educational environment, and quality of life. PLoS One, 10(6), e0131535.Theron, L. C., Liebenberg, L. A., & Ungar, M. (2015). Youth resilience and culture.Springer Netherlands.Thompson, B. C., Mazer, J. P., & Flood Grady, E. (2015). The changing nature ofparent-teacher communication: Mode selection in the smartphone era. Communication Education, 64(2), 187-207.Tough, P. (2013). how children succeed: Grit, curiosity, and the hidden power of character. NY: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Trier, K. A., Pappas, D., Bovitz, B., & Augustyn, M. (2018). Supporting development during military deployment and after. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 39(5), 447-449.Trautmann, J., Alhusen, J., & Gross, D. (2015). Impact of deployment on military families with young children: A systematic review. Nursing Outlook, 63(6), 656-679.Trautman, J. & Ho, G. W. (2018, July). Parenting needs among mothers of young childrenduring military deployment. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 50(4), 392.Turner, D. W. (2010). Qualitative interview design: A practical guide for novice investigatorsThe qualitative report, 15(3), 754-760.Turner, H. A., Finkelhor, D., Hamby, S., & Henly, M. (2017). Victimization and adversityamong children experiencing war-related parental absence or deployment in a nationally representative US sample. Child abuse & neglect, 67, 271-279.United States Department of Defense (n.d.). Educator’s guide to the military child during deployment. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/os/homefront/homefront.pdf on 6 June 2019VA. (2020). What is deployment. Retrieved from  https://www.mentalhealth.va.gov/communityproviders/docs/deployment_operational_experiences.pdf Vaillant, G. E. (2000). Adaptive mental mechanisms: Their role in Oa positive psychology. American psychologist, 55(1), 89.Vijaya, Vijaya, & Rajeshkumar (2016). Parental involvement and academic achievement among high school students. Review of Research, 5(12), 11-14. Von Culin, K. R., Tsukayama, E., & Duckworth, A. L. (2014). Unpacking grit: Motivational correlates of perseverance and passion for long-term goals. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 9(4), 306-312.Webster, D., & Rivers, N. (2018). Resisting resilience: Disrupting discourses of self-efficacy. Pedagogy, Culture, & Society, 1-13.Whyte, K. L., & Karabon, A. (2016). Transforming teacher-family relationships: Shifting roles and perceptions of home visits through the funds of knowledge approach. Early Years, 36(2), 207-221.Wright, K. B. & Shields, S.M. (2018, Spring/Summer). The effects of teacher home visits on student behavior, student academic achievement, and parent involvement. School Community Journal, 28(1), 67.Yazan, B. (2015). Three approaches to case study methods in education: Yin, Merriam, and Stake. The Qualitative Report, 20(2), 134-152.Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Yüksel, P., & Y?ld?r?m, S. (2015). Theoretical frameworks, methods, and procedures for conducting phenomenological studies in educational settings. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 6(1), 1-20. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271833455_Theoretical_Frameworks_Methods_and_Procedures_for_Conducting_Phenomenological_Studies_in_Educational_SettingsAPPENDIX A: LIBERTY UNIVERSITY IRB APPROVALWill includes once Submitted and Approved SEEKING VOLUNTEERS FOR A RESEARCH STUDYThe purpose of study: To explore the experiences of deployed military parents regarding active involvement in their child’s education. Participation Requirements:To participate in the study, you must currently be deployed or previously deployed within the past two years and have pre-K-12 school-aged children that are enrolled in a school outside of the homeParticipation in this study involves:1. Face-to-Face interview or online interview with the researcher (approximately 45-60 minutes). Interviews will be audio-recorded, but pseudonyms will be used to maintain confidentiality.1. Online focus group with several other participants. The session will be recorded for transcription. Pseudonyms will be used to maintain confidentiality1. Artifact for Analysis: Participants will be asked to provide relevant artifacts (if available) for analysis. Pseudonyms will be used to maintain confidentiality.To find out more information about this study, please contact Eder Bennett at:Phone: (860) 213-4464Email: Study Title: Military Deployed Parents’ Perceptions Of Involvement In The Education Of Their Children While Deployed.Principal Investigator: Eder Bennett Research Study: Perception of Involvement in Childs EducationContact: Eder BennettPhone: (860) 213-4464 Research Study: Perception of Involvement in Childs EducationContact: Eder BennettPhone: (860) 213-4464 Research Study: Perception of Involvement in Childs EducationContact: Eder BennettPhone: (860) 213-4464 Research Study: Perception of Involvement in Childs EducationContact: Eder BennettPhone: (860) 213-4464 Research Study: Perception of Involvement in Childs EducationContact: Eder BennettPhone: (860) 213-4464 Research Study: Perception of Involvement in Childs EducationContact: Eder BennettPhone: (860) 213-4464 Research Study: Perception of Involvement in Childs EducationContact: Eder BennettPhone: (860) 213-4464 Research Study: Perception of Involvement in Childs EducationContact: Eder BennettPhone: (860) 213-4464 Research Study: Perception of Involvement in Childs EducationContact: Eder BennettPhone: (860) 213-4464 APPENDIX B: RECRUITMENT FLYERAPPENDIX C: INFORMED CONSENTCONSENT FORMMILITARY DEPLOYED PARENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF INVOLVEMENT IN THE EDUCATION OF THEIR CHILDREN: A PHENOMENOLOGICAL STUDYEder G. BennettLiberty UniversitySchool of EducationGeneral Overview of Study: You are invited to be in a research study investigating the perceptions of deployed military parents regarding active involvement in their child’s education. You were selected as a possible participant because you are currently deployed or previously deployed and have pre-K-12 school-aged children that are currently enrolled in school. Please read this form and ask any questions you may have before agreeing to be in the study.Eder G. Bennett, a doctoral candidate in the School of Education at Liberty University, is conducting this study.Background Information: The purpose of this study is to explore the perceptions and lived experiences of deployed military parents regarding active involvement in their child’s education. This will provide a foundation of understanding that can assist educational stakeholders and the military community in filling the void created by a deployed parent with the goal to help the student of the deployed parent.Procedures: If you consent to be a part of this study, you will be asked to do the following:1. Complete a questionnaire that includes preliminary demographic data, such as age, race, military affiliation, and years of service. The questionnaire will also consist of three open-ended questions and should take approximately 30 minutes to complete2. Participate in a face-to-face or online interview with the researcher. Interviews will be conducted in a predesignated location (chosen by you). Each interview will last for approximately 45-60 minutes. Interviews will be audio-recorded, but pseudonyms will be used to maintain confidentiality.3. Participate in an online focus group through which several prepared questions will be answered. Participants will be gathered in an online forum for 45-60 minutes using a videoconferencing software such as ZOOM. The online session will be recorded for transcription. Pseudonyms will be used to maintain confidentiality.4. Provide relevant artifacts for analysis: You will be asked to provide (if available) artifacts such as journals, letters, and email correspondence with teachers pertaining to your children. These artifacts will be analyzed to gain further insight into the issues that deployed parents face. Pseudonyms will be used to maintain confidentiality.Risks: The risks involved in this study are minimal and are no more than what participants encounter in everyday life. If you experience discomfort while taking part in this study, you may choose to stop participating at any time.Benefits: The direct benefits participants should expect to receive from taking part in this study will be understanding the perceptions of other deployed military parents regarding active involvement in their child’s education. Though your participation may have potential benefits to education and the military community as a whole, you may not receive any direct benefits of your involvement. Compensation: Participants will not be compensated for participating in this study.Confidentiality: The records of this study will be kept private. In any sort of report, I might publish, I will not include any information that will make it possible to identify a subject. Research records will be stored securely, and only the researcher will have access to the artifacts. I may share the data I collect from you for use in future research studies or with other researchers; if I share the data that I collect about you, I will remove any information that could identify you, if applicable, before I share the data.1. Procedures will be taken to protect the privacy of all participants, including the use of assigned pseudonyms and interviews conducted in locations where others will not easily overhear the conversation.1. Data will be stored on a password-protected computer, and all documents will be kept in a locked file cabinet. Data may be used in future presentations.1. The researcher will transcribe interviews. Recordings will be stored on a password-locked computer for three years and then erased. Only the researcher will have access to these recordings.1. I cannot assure participants that other members of the online focus group will not share what was discussed with persons outside of the group.Voluntary Nature of the Study: Participation in this study is voluntary. Your decision whether or not to participate will not affect your current or future relations with Liberty University or your positions in the military. If you decide to participate, you are free not to answer any question or withdraw at any time without affecting those relationships.How to Withdraw from the Study: If you choose to withdraw from the study, please contact the researcher at the email address/phone number included in the next paragraph. Should you decide to withdraw, data collected from you, apart from focus group data, will be destroyed immediately and will not be included in this study. Focus group data will not be destroyed, but your contributions to the focus group will not be included in the study if you choose to withdraw.Contacts and Questions: The researcher conducting this study is Eder G. Bennett. You may ask any questions you have now. If you have questions later, you are encouraged to contact him at (860) 213-4464 or [email protected] you would like to address questions or concerns to someone other than the researcher, you are encouragedto contact the researcher’s faculty chair, Dr. James Eller, at (440) 319-1794 or [email protected] of Consent: I have read and understood the above information. I have asked questions and have received answers. I consent to participate in the study. The researcher has my permission to audio-record me as part of my participation in this study.Signature of Participant Date Signature of Investigator DateAPPENDIX D: RECRUITMENT LETTERFall 2019Dear Service Member, As a graduate student in the School of Education at Liberty University, I am conducting research as part of the requirements for a doctoral degree in Educational Leadership. I am writing to invite you to participate in my research study about the perceptions of military parents who are deployed regarding their active involvement in their child’s education. You\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'re eligible to be in this study because you have been identified as having some experience with this particular issue. If you decide to participate in this study, you will partake in a face-to-face or online recorded interview, take part in an online focus group, and be asked to provide relevant artifacts (if available) for analysis. You should be able to complete your participation in approximately two to three weeks, with it taking four to five hours to complete all procedures. Your name and/or other identifying information will be requested as part of your participation, but the information will remain confidential.To participate, please respond to my email with your desire to be a possible participant. Following your response to participate, I will then contact you for an interview and provide the consent form for you to sign. The consent document contains additional information about my research.Sincerely,Eder G. BennettDoctoral CandidateLiberty UniversityAPPENDIX E: QUESTIONNAIREThe purpose of this qualitative transcendental phenomenological study is to explore the perceptions and lived experiences of deployed military parents regarding active involvement in their child’s education. This questionnaire is designed to obtain demographic information as well as to capture your perceptions and experiences of being a parent while deployed overseas in the military. 1. Name: ____________________________________________________________ 2. Age: _____________ 3. Ethnicity: ______________________ 4. Branch of Service: _____________________________________________ 5. Rank: __________________________________________________ 6. Age of spouse: ____________________________________________ 7. Spouse current profession: _______________________________________8. Highest degree earned ____________________________________________________ 9. How many school age children currently in your household: _______________________ 10. How many times have you been deployed: _____________________________________?11. If currently deployed, what is the duration of your deployment: ______________________12. If not currently deployed: When was your last deployment and how long________________13. Reflect on your experiences of being a parent while deployed in the military. Please provide a brief written response to each question.1. What word best describes your initial thought about deployment as it relates to your ability to be involved in your child’s education. Please explain 1. What support (familial, financial, experience) has aided in maintaining a sense of involvement in your child’s education1. What is the number one challenge (aside from a distance) that hinders your ability to participate in a child’s education? APPENDIX F: INTERVIEW GUIDESemi-Structured, Open-Ended Interview QuestionsCentral Research Question: What are the perceptions and lived experiences of deployed military parents regarding active involvement in their child’s education?Opening Questions 1. Please introduce yourself, describe yourself and your family 1. How long have you been serving in the military? 1. In the past two years, how many times and for how long where you deployed1. What is the age and gender of your school-age child or children? 1. Please explain your experience in the military thus far Questions relating to participants perceptions 1. What is your definition of parental involvement, particularly as it relates to education? 1. In what way (if any) does your definition of parental involvement change while deployed1. How would you compare and contrast your role in your child’s education when not deployed and while deployed? 1. What changes have you experienced in your child’s behavior, focus, and attitude towards learning while deployed?1. What are some ways or methods used to participate in your child’s education while deployed, and how do they differ from the technique used when not deployed?1. How has your deployment impacted your spouse, particularly as it relates to his/her ability to be involved in your child’s education 1. Reflect on the first time you spoke with your child about their education when you were deployed. What was that experience like? 1. Reflect on your child’s education. What is your perception of your child’s sense of how your deployment impacts his or her learning?Questions relating to participants’ perceptions of challenges1. Describe a time (while deployed) when you encountered a barrier or challenge that prevented you from being involved in their education? 1. Describe a time when you felt that you could be more involved in your children’s education while deployed. Were you able to come up with a solution? If so, please describe it. 1. How does being deployed alters your interactions with your child’s teachers and other educators 1. What stage of deployment (pre-deployment, deployment, post-deployment) do you believe creates the most challenges in attempting to stay involved in your child’s education, please explain. 1. What advice would you give a military parent who is deployed or may deploy in the futureAPPENDIX G: FOCUS GROUP QUESTION GUIDESemi-Structured, Open-Ended Focus Group QuestionsCentral Research Question: What are the perceptions and lived experiences of deployed military parents regarding active involvement in their child’s education?Opening Questions: 1. Will each individual, please state your name, your military branch, and length of serviceQuestions Relating to Challenges Parents experience while Deployed:1. As a parent, how would you describe your overall experience of being separated from your family while deployed1. What would you identify as the most challenging aspect of being a military deployed parent? 1. From a parental standpoint, what are some examples of challenges you encountered while deployed, and how have you overcome themQuestions Relating to Participants involvement:1. How has your deployment affected your child’s performance in school?1. How often and in what way do you interact with your child’s teachers or educator, what types of feedback have you received https://www.fhsdschools.org/UserFiles/Servers/Server_995699/File/2015-16/Parents/Epstein%20-%20Six%20Keys.pdf

MILITAY DEPLOYED PAENT PECEPTIONS OF INVOLVEMENT IN THE EDUCATION OF THEI CHILDEN: A PHENOMENOLOGICAL STUDYbyLiberty UniversityA Dissertation Presented in Partial FulfillmentOf the equirements for the DegreeDoctor of EducationLiberty University2021MILITAY DEPLOYED PAENT PECEPTIONS OF INVOLVEMENT IN THE EDUCATION OF THEI CHILDEN: A PHENOMENOLOGICAL STUDYby Eder G. BennettA Dissertation Presented in Partial FulfillmentOf the equirements for the DegreeDoctor of EducationAPPOVED BY:ABSTACTThe purpose of this qualitative transcendental phenomenological study was to explore the perceptions and lived experiences of deployed military parents regarding active involvement in their childs education. For this purpose, this study developed an informed answer to the following research question: What are the perceptions of deployed militaryparents regarding active involvement in their childs education? The study used the theory of Epstein regarding the triangle relationship between parents, teachers, and the community to help explore and make sense of the stories and experiences of parents who have or are currently experiencing challenges…...

mla

REFERENCESAlfano, C. A., Lau, S., Balderas, J., Bunnell, B. E., & Beidel, D. C. (2016). The impact of military deployment on children: Placing developmental risk in context. Clinical Psychology Review, 43, 17-29.Allen, D. C. (2015). Research, when you know what you’re doing: A review of essentials of qualitative inquiry. The Qualitative Report, 20(4), 451-453.Amineh, R. J., & Asl, H. D. (2015). Review of constructivism and social constructivism. Journal of Social Sciences, Literature, and Languages, 1(1), 9-16.Anney, V. N. (2014). Ensuring the quality of the findings of qualitative research: Looking at trustworthiness criteria. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies (JETERAPS), 5(2), 272-281.Appel, H., Gerlach, A. L., & Crusius, J. (2016). The interplay between Facebook use, social comparison, envy, and depression. Current Opinion in Psychology, 9, 44-49.Bandura, A. (2018). Toward a psychology of human agency: Pathways and reflections. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(2), 130-136.Bello?Utu, C. F., & DeSocio, J. E. (2015). Military deployment and reintegration: A systematic review of child coping. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing, 28(1), 23-34.Benner, A. D., Boyle, A. E., & Sadler, S. (2016). Parental involvement and adolescents’ educational success: The roles of prior achievement and socioeconomic status. Journal of youth and adolescence, 45(6), 1053-1064.Bennett, J. (2018). Combating sexual assault with the military ethic: Exploring culture, military institutions, and norms-based preventive policy. Armed Forces & Society, 44(4), 707-730.Bolles, E., & Patrizio, K. (2016). Leadership tenets of military veterans working as school administrators. Journal of Leadership Education, 15(3), 98-116.Bondy, E., Ross, D. D., Gallingane, C., & Hambacher, E. (2007). Creating environments of success and resilience: Culturally responsive classroom management and more. Urban Education, 42(4), 326-348.Brownfield, D., & Thompson, K. (1991). Attachment to peers and delinquent behavior. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 33, 45.Burton, N. W., Pakenham, K. I., & Brown, W. J. (2010). Feasibility and effectiveness of psychosocial resilience training: A pilot study of the READY program. Psychology, Health, and Medicine, 15(3), 266-277.Carey, M. A., & Asbury, J. E. (2016). Focus group research. Routledge.Castro, M., Expósito-Casas, E., López-Martín, E., Lizasoain, L., Navarro-Asencio, E., & Gaviria, J. L. (2015). Parental involvement on student academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational research review, 14, 33-46.Chang, R. (2017). Genevra Walters: How tech can close the achievement gap: Students who struggle need more technology, not less. THE Journal (Technological Horizons in Education), 44(1), 12.Cheng, C. C. & Huang, K. H. (2018). Education reform and teacher agency. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 76(3), 286-287.Chester, J., & Montgomery, K. (2008). No escape: Marketing to kids in the digital age. Multinational Monitor, 29(1), 11.Conforte, A. M., Bakalar, J. L., Shank, L. M., Quinlan, J., Stephens, M. B., Sbrocco, T., & Tanofsky-Kraff, M. (2017). Assessing military community support: Relations among perceived military community support, child psychosocial adjustment, and parent psychosocial adjustment. Military Medicine, 182(9-10), e1871-e1878.Cozza, S. J., Knobloch, L. K., Gewirtz, A. H., DeVoe, E. R., Gorman, L. A., Flake, E. M., ... & Lerner, R. M. (2018). Lessons learned and future recommendations for conducting research with military children and families. In A Battle Plan for Supporting Military Families (pp. 265-287). Springer, Cham.Creswell, J. (2003). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches.  California: Sage Publication.Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. CA: Sage.Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.Dahlman, H. (2013, September/October). The journey toward cross-cultural competence is never-ending. Momentum, 44(3), 27-31.De Pedro, K. T., Astor, R. A., Gilreath, T. D., Benbenishty, R., & Berkowitz, R. (2018). School climate, deployment, and mental health among students in military-connected schools. Youth & Society, 50(1), 93-115.DeVoe, E. R. (2017). Supporting military families with young children throughout the deployment lifecycle. Boston: Trustees of Boston University.DeVoe, E. R., Paris, R., Emmert-Aronson, B., Ross, A., & Acker, M. (2017). A randomized clinical trial of a post-deployment parenting intervention for service members and their families with very young children. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 9(S1), 25.Doge, P. & Keller, H. (2014, July-September). Similarity of mothers\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\' and preschool teachers\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\' evaluations of socialization goals in a cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 28(3), 377-381.Epstein, J. L., Sanders, M. G., Sheldon, S. B., Simon, B. S., Salinas, K. C., Jansorn, N. R., ... & Hutchins, D. J. (2018). School, family, and community partnerships: Your handbook for action. City: Corwin Press.Ellison, T. L. & Evans, J. N. (2016, Fall). Minecraft, teachers, parents, and learning: What they need to know and understand. SchoolCommunity Journal, 26(2), 25-30.Eskreis-Winkler, L., Duckworth, A. L., Shulman, E. P., & Beal, S. (2014). The grit effect: Predicting retention in the military, the workplace, school, and marriage. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 36.Espinosa, E. M., Sorensen, J. R., & Lopez, M. A. (2013). Youth pathways to placement:The influence of gender, mental health need, and trauma on confinement in the juvenile justice system. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 42(12), 1824-1836.Fosnot, C. T. (2013). Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice. Teachers College Press.Francis Howell School District. (2018). Epstein’s 6 types of parent involvement. Retrieved from on 6 June 2019Freberg, K., Graham, K., McGaughey, K., & Freberg, L. A. (2011). Who are the social media influencers? A study of public perceptions of personality. Public Relations Review, 37(1), 90-92.Gangai, K. N. (2014). Absenteeism at workplace: What are the factors influencing it? International Journal of Organizational Behavior & Management Perspectives, 3(4), 1258-1265.Gardner, G. (2001). Unreliable memories and other contingencies: problems with biographical knowledge. Qualitative research, 1(2), 185-204.Glassman, M., & Kang, M. J. (2016). Teaching and learning through open-source educative processes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 281-290.Graham-Clay, S. (2009, Spring). Communicating with parents: Strategies for teachers. School Community Journal, 15(1), 117-121.Henderson, M., Selwyn, N., & Aston, R. (2017). What works and why? Student perceptions of ‘useful’ digital technology in university teaching and learning. Studies in Higher Education, 42(8), 1567-1579.Herrera, C., Grossman, J. B., Kauh, T. J., & McMaken, J. (2011). Mentoring in schools: An impact study of Big Brothers Big Sisters school?based mentoring. Child Development, 82(1), 346-361.Hoffding, S., & Martiny, K. (2016). Framing a phenomenological interview: What, why, and how. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 15(4), 539-564.Husserl, E. (1999). The essential Husserl: Basic writings in transcendental phenomenology. Indiana University Press.Katsirikou, A., & Lin, C. S. (2017). Revealing the “Essence” of things: Using phenomenology in LIS research. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries, 2(4), 469-478.Kelley, M. L., White, T. D., Milletich, R. J., Hollis, B. F., Haislip, B. N., Heidt, E. K., & Henson, J. M. (2016). Youth emotional reactivity, interparental conflict, parent hostility, and worrying among children with substance-abusing parents. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25(3), 1024-1034.Knobloch, L. K., Knobloch-Fedders, L. M., Yorgason, J. B., Ebata, A. T., & McGlaughlin, P. C. (2017). Military children’s difficulty with reintegration after deployment: A relational turbulence model perspective. Journal of Family Psychology, 31(5), 542.Koon-Magnin, S., Bowers, D., Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., & Arata, C. (2016). Social learning, self-control, gender, and variety of violent delinquency. Deviant Behavior, 37(7), 824-836.Kuper, A., Lingard, L., & Levinson, W. (2008, September 20). Qualitative research: Critically appraising qualitative research. BMJ, 337, 687–689. Doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1035Lester, P., Aralis, H., Sinclair, M., Kiff, C., Lee, K. H., Mustillo, S., & Wadsworth, S. M. (2016). The impact of deployment on parental, family, and child adjustment in military families. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 47(6), 938-949.Listwan, S. J. (2013). Introduction to juvenile justice. San Diego, CA: Bridgepoint.Loprinzi, C. E., Prasad, K., Schroeder, D. R., & Sood, A. (2011). Stress Management and Resilience Training (SMART) program to decrease stress and enhance resilience among breast cancer survivors: a pilot randomized clinical trial. Clinical breast cancer, 11(6), 364-368.MacDermid Wadsworth, S., Bailey, K. M., & Coppola, E. C. (2017). US military children and the wartime deployments of family members. Child Development Perspectives, 11(1), 23-28.Mahuro, G. M., & Hungi, N. (2016). Parental participation improves student academic achievement: A case of Iganga and Mayuge districts in Uganda. Cogent Education, 3(1), 1264170.Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2014). Designing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Merriam, S. B., & Grenier, R. S. (Eds.). (2019). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. John Wiley & Sons.Moeller, J. D., Culler, E. D., Hamilton, M. D., Aronson, K. R., & Perkins, D. F. (2015). The effects of military-connected parental absence on the behavioral and academic functioning of children: A literature review. Journal of Children\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s Services, 10(3), 291-306.Moll, L. (ed). (1990). Vygotsky and education. Cambridge University Press.Moustakas, C. (1990). Heuristic research: Design, methodology, and applications. Sage Publications.Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Neuendorf, K. A. (2016). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Neuman, W. L. (2008). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches, 6th ed. New York: Allyn & Bacon.Nicosia, N., Wong, E., Shier, V., Massachi, S., & Datar, A. (2017). Parental deployment, adolescent academic and social-behavioral maladjustment, and parental psychological well-being in military families. Public Health Reports, 132(1), 93-105.Nicosia, N., Wong, E., Shier, V., Massachi, S., & Datar, A. (2017). Parental deployment, adolescent academic and social-behavioral maladjustment, and parental psychological well-being in military families. Public Health Reports, 132(1), 93-105.Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1609406917733847.Nunez J. C., Suarez, N., Rosário, P., Vallejo, G., Valle, A., & Epstein, J. L. (2015). Relationships between perceived parental involvement in homework, student homework behaviors, and academic achievement: differences among elementary, junior high, and high school students. Metacognition and learning, 10(3), 375-406.O’Nyumba, T., Wilson, K., Derrick, C. J., & Mukherjee, N. (2018). The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 9(1), 20-32.O\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'Neal, C. W., Mallette, J. K., & Mancini, J. A. (2018). The importance of parents\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\' community connections for adolescent well?being: An examination of military families. American Journal of Community Psychology, 61(1-2), 204-217.Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Perkins-Gough, D. (2013). The significance of grit: A conversation with Angela Lee Duckworth. Educational Leadership, 71(1), 14-20.Perry, B. D. (2006). The boy who was raised as a dog and other stories from a child psychiatrist\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s notebook: What traumatized children can teach us about loss, love, and healing. New York, NY: Basic Books. Peters, M. D., Godfrey, C. M., Khalil, H., McInerney, P., Parker, D., & Soares, C. B. (2015). Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 13(3), 141-146.Pexton, S., Farrants, J., & Yule, W. (2018). The impact of fathers’ military deployment on child adjustment. The support needs of primary school children and their families separated during active military service: A pilot study. Clinical child psychology and psychiatry, 23(1), 110-124.Powers, R. (2018). United States military installation profiles. Retrieved from http://usmilitary.about.com on 6 June 2019Project Implicit. (2018). Results. Retrieved from https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/Study?tid=-1  on 6 June 2019RAND Corporation. (2012). How do soldiers’ deployments affect children\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s academic performance and behavioral health? Retrieved from  https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9651/index1.html  on 6 June 2019Reivich, K. J., Seligman, M. E., & McBride, S. (2011). Master resilience training in the USArmy. American Psychologist, 66(1), 25.Robertson-Kraft, C., & Duckworth, A. L. (2014). True grit: Trait-level perseverance and passion for long-term goals predict effectiveness and retention among novice teachers. Teachers College Record, 116(3).Roepke, A. M., & Seligman, M. E. (2016). Depression and prospection. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 55(1), 23-48.Rosenthal, M. (2016). Qualitative research methods: Why, when, and how to conduct interviews and focus groups in pharmacy research. Currents in pharmacy teaching and learning, 8(4), 509-516.Rule, P. & John, V.M. (2015). A necessary dialogue: Theory in case study research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 3(8), 1-11. Sandoz, E.K. & Moyer, D. N. (2015, October). Psychological flexibility as a framework for understanding and improving family reintegration following military deployment. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 41(4), 495-499.Seligman, M. (2018). PERMA and the building blocks of well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 13(4), 333-335.Shankar, K., Hakken, D., & Østerlund, C. (2017). Rethinking artifacts. The handbook ofscience and technology studies, 59-85.Shriner, B & M. Shriner. (2014). Essentials of lifespan development: A topicalperspective. Bridgepoint Education: San Diego, CA.Silverman, D. (2016). Qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Slavin, R. E. (2019). Educational psychology: Theory and practice. Pearson.Smith, P. L., & McSweeney, J. (2017). Organizational perspectives of nurse executives in 15 hospitals on the impact and effectiveness of rapid response teams. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 43(6), 289-298. doi:10.1016/j.jcjq.2017.01.006Spitzer, B., & Aronson, J. (2015). Minding and mending the gap: Social psychological interventions to reduce educational disparities. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(1), 1-18.Stetson, R., Stetson, E., Sinclair, B. & Nix, K. (2012). Home visits: Teacher reflections about relationships, student behavior, and achievement. Issues in Teacher Education, 21(1), 21-37.Tempski, P., Santos, I. S., Mayer, F. B., Enns, S. C., Perotta, B., Paro, H. B.,&Guimaraes, K. B. (2015). Relationship among medical student resilience, educational environment, and quality of life. PLoS One, 10(6), e0131535.Theron, L. C., Liebenberg, L. A., & Ungar, M. (2015). Youth resilience and culture.Springer Netherlands.Thompson, B. C., Mazer, J. P., & Flood Grady, E. (2015). The changing nature ofparent-teacher communication: Mode selection in the smartphone era. Communication Education, 64(2), 187-207.Tough, P. (2013). how children succeed: Grit, curiosity, and the hidden power of character. NY: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Trier, K. A., Pappas, D., Bovitz, B., & Augustyn, M. (2018). Supporting development during military deployment and after. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 39(5), 447-449.Trautmann, J., Alhusen, J., & Gross, D. (2015). Impact of deployment on military families with young children: A systematic review. Nursing Outlook, 63(6), 656-679.Trautman, J. & Ho, G. W. (2018, July). Parenting needs among mothers of young childrenduring military deployment. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 50(4), 392.Turner, D. W. (2010). Qualitative interview design: A practical guide for novice investigatorsThe qualitative report, 15(3), 754-760.Turner, H. A., Finkelhor, D., Hamby, S., & Henly, M. (2017). Victimization and adversityamong children experiencing war-related parental absence or deployment in a nationally representative US sample. Child abuse & neglect, 67, 271-279.United States Department of Defense (n.d.). Educator’s guide to the military child during deployment. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/os/homefront/homefront.pdf on 6 June 2019VA. (2020). What is deployment. Retrieved from  https://www.mentalhealth.va.gov/communityproviders/docs/deployment_operational_experiences.pdf Vaillant, G. E. (2000). Adaptive mental mechanisms: Their role in Oa positive psychology. American psychologist, 55(1), 89.Vijaya, Vijaya, & Rajeshkumar (2016). Parental involvement and academic achievement among high school students. Review of Research, 5(12), 11-14. Von Culin, K. R., Tsukayama, E., & Duckworth, A. L. (2014). Unpacking grit: Motivational correlates of perseverance and passion for long-term goals. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 9(4), 306-312.Webster, D., & Rivers, N. (2018). Resisting resilience: Disrupting discourses of self-efficacy. Pedagogy, Culture, & Society, 1-13.Whyte, K. L., & Karabon, A. (2016). Transforming teacher-family relationships: Shifting roles and perceptions of home visits through the funds of knowledge approach. Early Years, 36(2), 207-221.Wright, K. B. & Shields, S.M. (2018, Spring/Summer). The effects of teacher home visits on student behavior, student academic achievement, and parent involvement. School Community Journal, 28(1), 67.Yazan, B. (2015). Three approaches to case study methods in education: Yin, Merriam, and Stake. The Qualitative Report, 20(2), 134-152.Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Yüksel, P., & Y?ld?r?m, S. (2015). Theoretical frameworks, methods, and procedures for conducting phenomenological studies in educational settings. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 6(1), 1-20. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271833455_Theoretical_Frameworks_Methods_and_Procedures_for_Conducting_Phenomenological_Studies_in_Educational_SettingsAPPENDIX A: LIBERTY UNIVERSITY IRB APPROVALWill includes once Submitted and Approved SEEKING VOLUNTEERS FOR A RESEARCH STUDYThe purpose of study: To explore the experiences of deployed military parents regarding active involvement in their child’s education. Participation Requirements:To participate in the study, you must currently be deployed or previously deployed within the past two years and have pre-K-12 school-aged children that are enrolled in a school outside of the homeParticipation in this study involves:· Face-to-Face interview or online interview with the researcher (approximately 45-60 minutes). Interviews will be audio-recorded, but pseudonyms will be used to maintain confidentiality.· Online focus group with several other participants. The session will be recorded for transcription. Pseudonyms will be used to maintain confidentiality· Artifact for Analysis: Participants will be asked to provide relevant artifacts (if available) for analysis. Pseudonyms will be used to maintain confidentiality.To find out more information about this study, please contact Eder Bennett at:Phone: (860) 213-4464Email: Study Title: Military Deployed Parents’ Perceptions Of Involvement In The Education Of Their Children While Deployed.Principal Investigator: Eder Bennett Research Study: Perception of Involvement in Childs EducationContact: Eder BennettPhone: (860) 213-4464 Research Study: Perception of Involvement in Childs EducationContact: Eder BennettPhone: (860) 213-4464 Research Study: Perception of Involvement in Childs EducationContact: Eder BennettPhone: (860) 213-4464 Research Study: Perception of Involvement in Childs EducationContact: Eder BennettPhone: (860) 213-4464 Research Study: Perception of Involvement in Childs EducationContact: Eder BennettPhone: (860) 213-4464 Research Study: Perception of Involvement in Childs EducationContact: Eder BennettPhone: (860) 213-4464 Research Study: Perception of Involvement in Childs EducationContact: Eder BennettPhone: (860) 213-4464 Research Study: Perception of Involvement in Childs EducationContact: Eder BennettPhone: (860) 213-4464 Research Study: Perception of Involvement in Childs EducationContact: Eder BennettPhone: (860) 213-4464 APPENDIX B: RECRUITMENT FLYERAPPENDIX C: INFORMED CONSENTCONSENT FORMMILITARY DEPLOYED PARENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF INVOLVEMENT IN THE EDUCATION OF THEIR CHILDREN: A PHENOMENOLOGICAL STUDYEder G. BennettLiberty UniversitySchool of EducationGeneral Overview of Study: You are invited to be in a research study investigating the perceptions of deployed military parents regarding active involvement in their child’s education. You were selected as a possible participant because you are currently deployed or previously deployed and have pre-K-12 school-aged children that are currently enrolled in school. Please read this form and ask any questions you may have before agreeing to be in the study.Eder G. Bennett, a doctoral candidate in the School of Education at Liberty University, is conducting this study.Background Information: The purpose of this study is to explore the perceptionsand lived experinces of deployed military parents regarding active involvement in their child’s education. This will provide a foundation of understanding that can assist educational stakeholders and the military community in filling the void created by a deployed parent with the goal tohelp the student of the deployed parent.Procedures: If you consent to be a part of this study, you will be asked to do the following:1. Complete a questionnaire that includes preliminary demographic data, such as age, race, military affiliation, and years of service. The questionnaire will also consist of three open-ended questions and should take approximately 30 minutes to complete2. Participate in a face-to-face or online interview with the researcher. Interviews will be conducted in a predesignated location (chosen by you). Each interview will last for approximately 45-60 minutes. Interviews will be audio-recorded, but pseudonyms will be used to maintain confidentiality.3. Participate in an online focus group through which several prepared questions will be answered. Participants will be gathered in an online forum for 45-60 minutes using a videoconferencing software such as ZOOM. The online session will be recorded for transcription. Pseudonyms will be used to maintain confidentiality.4. Provide relevant artifacts for analysis: You will be asked to provide (if available) artifacts such as journals, letters, and email correspondence with teachers pertaining to your children. These artifacts will be analyzed to gain further insight into the issues that deployed parents face. Pseudonyms will be used to maintain confidentiality.Risks: The risks involved in this study are minimal and are no more than what participants encounter in everyday life. If you experience discomfort while taking part in this study, you may choose to stop participating at any time.Benefits: The direct benefits participants should expect to receive from taking part in this study will be understanding the perceptions of other deployed military parents regarding active involvement in their child’s education. Though your participation may have potential benefits to education and the military community as a whole, you may not receive any direct benefits of your involvement. Compensation: Participants will not be compensated for participating in this study.Confidentiality: The records of this study will be kept private. In any sort of report, I might publish, I will not include any information that will make it possible to identify a subject. Research records will be stored securely, and only the researcher will have access to the artifacts. I may share the data I collect from you for use in future research studies or with other researchers; if I share the data that I collect about you, I will remove any information that could identify you, if applicable, before I share the data.· Procedures will be taken to protect the privacy of all participants, including the use of assigned pseudonyms and interviews conducted in locations where others will not easily overhear the conversation.· Data will be stored on a password-protected computer, and all documents will be kept in a locked file cabinet. Data may be used in future presentations.· The researcher will transcribe interviews. Recordings will be stored on a password-locked computer for three years and then erased. Only the researcher will have access to these recordings.· I cannot assure participants that other members of the online focus group will not share what was discussed with persons outside of the group.Voluntary Nature of the Study: Participation in this study is voluntary. Your decision whether or not to participate will not affect your current or future relations with Liberty University or your positions in the military. If you decide to participate, you are free not to answer any question or withdraw at any time without affecting those relationships.How to Withdraw from the Study: If you choose to withdraw from the study, please contact the researcher at the email address/phone number included in the next paragraph. Should you decide to withdraw, data collected from you, apart from focus group data, will be destroyed immediately and will not be included in this study. Focus group data will not be destroyed, but your contributions to the focus group will not be included in the study if you choose to withdraw.Contacts and Questions: The researcher conducting this study is Eder G. Bennett. You may ask any questions you have now. If you have questions later, you are encouraged to contact him at (860) 213-4464 or [email protected] you would like to address questions or concerns to someone other than the researcher, you are encouragedto contact the researcher’s faculty chair, Dr. James Eller, at (440) 319-1794 or [email protected] of Consent: I have read and understood the above information. I have asked questions and have received answers. I consent to participate in the study. The researcher has my permission to audio-record me as part of my participation in this study.Signature of Participant Date Signature of Investigator DateAPPENDIX D: RECRUITMENT LETTERFall 2019Dear Service Member, As a graduate student in the School of Education at Liberty University, I am conducting research as part of the requirements for a doctoral degree in Educational Leadership. I am writing to invite you to participate in my research study about the perceptions of military parents who are deployed regarding their active involvement in their child’s education. You\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'re eligible to be in this study because you have been identified as having some experience with this particular issue. If you decide to participate in this study, you will partake in a face-to-face or online recorded interview, take part in an online focus group, and be asked to provide relevant artifacts (if available) for analysis. You should be able to complete your participation in approximately two to three weeks, with it taking four to five hours to complete all procedures. Your name and/or other identifying information will be requested as part of your participation, but the information will remain confidential.To participate, please respond to my email with your desire to be a possible participant. Following your response to participate, I will then contact you for an interview and provide the consent form for you to sign. The consent document contains additional information about my research.Sincerely,Eder G. BennettDoctoral CandidateLiberty UniversityAPPENDIX E: QUESTIONNAIREThe purpose of this qualitative transcendental phenomenological study is to explore the perceptionsand lived experinces of deployed military parents regarding active involvement in their child’s education. This questionnaire is designed to obtain demographic information as well as to capture your perceptions and experiences of being a parent while deployed overseas in the military. 1. Name: ____________________________________________________________ 2. Age: _____________ 3. Ethnicity: ______________________ 4. Branch of Service: _____________________________________________ 5. Rank: __________________________________________________ 6. Age of spouse: ____________________________________________ 7. Spouse current profession: _______________________________________8. Highest degree earned ____________________________________________________ 9. How many school age children currently in your household: _______________________ 10. How many times have you been deployed: _____________________________________?11. If currently deployed, what is the duration of your deployment: ______________________12. If not currently deployed: When was your last deployment and how long________________13. Reflect on your experiences of being a parent while deployed in the military. Please provide a brief written response to each question.a. What word best describes your initial thought about deployment as it relates to your ability to be involved in your child’s education. Please explain b. What support (familial, financial, experience) has aided in maintaining a sense of involvement in your child’s educationc. What is the number one challenge (aside from a distance) that hinders your ability to participate in a child’s education? APPENDIX F: INTERVIEW GUIDESemi-Structured, Open-Ended Interview QuestionsCentral Research Question: What are the perceptions and lived experinces of deployed military parents regarding active involvement in their child’s education?Opening Questions 19. Please introduce yourself, describe yourself and your family 20. How long have you been serving in the military 21. In the past two years, how many times and for how long where you deployed22. What is the age and gender of your school-age child or children 23. Please explain your experience in the military thus far Questions relating to participants perceptions 24. What is your definition of parental involvement, particularly as it relates to education 25. In what way (if any) does your definition of parental involvement change while deployed26. How would you compare and contrast your role in your child’s education when not deployed and while deployed 27. What changes have you experienced in your child’s behavior, focus, and attitude towards learning while deployed?28. What are some ways or methods used to participate in your child’s education while deployed, and how do they differ from the technique used when not deployed29. How has your deployment impacted your spouse, particularly as it relates to his/her ability to be involved in your child’s education 30. Reflect on the first time you spoke with your child about their education when you were deployed. What was that experience like? 31. Reflect on your child’s education. What is your perception of your child’s sense of how your deployment impacts his or her learning?Questions relating to participants’ perceptions of challenges32. Describe a time (while deployed) when you encountered a barrier or challenge that prevented you from being involved in their education? 33. Describe a time when you felt that you could be more involved in your children’s education while deployed. Were you able to come up with a solution? If so, please describe it. 34. How does being deployed alters your interactions with your child’s teachers and other educators 35. What stage of deployment (pre-deployment, deployment, post-deployment) do you believe creates the most challenges in attempting to stay involved in your child’s education, please explain 36. What advice would you give a military parent who is deployed or may deploy in the futureAPPENDIX G: FOCUS GROUP QUESTION GUIDESemi-Structured, Open-Ended Focus Group QuestionsCentral Research Question: What are the perceptions and lived experinces of deployed military parents regarding active involvement in their child’s education?Opening Questions: 7. Will each individual, please state your name, your military branch, and length of serviceQuestions Relating to Challenges Parents experience while Deployed:8. As a parent, how would you describe your overall experience of being separated from your family while deployed9. What would you identify as the most challenging aspect of being a military deployed parent 10. From a parental standpoint, what are some examples of challenges you encountered while deployed, and how have you overcome themQuestions Relating to Participants involvement:11. How has your deployment affected your child’s performance in school12. How often and in what way do you interact with your child’s teachers or educator, what types of feedback have you received https://www.fhsdschools.org/UserFiles/Servers/Server_995699/File/2015-16/Parents/Epstein%20-%20Six%20Keys.pdf

Administrative Strategies for Effective Communication
Education contains multiple responsibilities. One starts the learning process in the world from within the family nurture, before continuing to pursue formal education in schools and academy. However, human does not stop learning from their family. Getting exposed to higher education, they also learn things from hands-on experiences and from what are happening in their surroundings.

This reveals the fact that family and environment are two contributing factors, in addition to formal education process in official institution in a community. The three factors determine how education makes one person in the society a distinct, honorable man.

With the great potentials, now education has been a regional issue. Fully conventional learning processes have been attempted within the education system. However, with the growing needs to perform effective schooling and to gain the best academic result, educators realize the need to incorporate the three factors: school, parents, and communities, to…...

mla

Bibliography

Chalkboard Tips and Resources. 1996. The Family Resource Coalition's Report "Parents Leading the Way" Vol. 15 No. 2. Web site: http://www.handinhand.org/parentinvolve.html.

ERIC Document. Communities Connecting Family and Schools. Strong Families, Strong Schools. Web site: http://eric-web.tc.columbia.edu/families/strong/community.html

ERIC Document. School-Family Web site: http://eric-web.tc.columbia.edu/families/strong/sfp.html.

ERIC Documents. Family Involvement. Strong Families, Strong Schools. http://eric-web.tc.columbia.eu/families/strong/involve.html.

Essay Topic 1: The Deterrent Effect of School Theft Policies

Pro-Deterrent Viewpoint:

School theft policies that impose swift and strict consequences deter students from committing theft by creating a fear of negative repercussions.
The threat of suspension, expulsion, or legal charges acts as a psychological deterrent, discouraging students from engaging in theft.
By establishing clear boundaries and consequences, schools maintain a safe and orderly learning environment where students feel secure.

Anti-Deterrent Viewpoint:

Strict school theft policies create a punitive atmosphere that alienates students and undermines their educational progress.
Students who are caught stealing may be subjected to harsh punishments that can harm....

I. Introduction

A. Hook: Begin with a compelling statement or anecdote that highlights the importance of homework and its benefits for students.
B. Thesis statement: Clearly state the main argument that schools should not abolish homework.

II. Body Paragraph 1: Academic Benefits of Homework

A. Reinforce learning: Explain how homework helps students strengthen their understanding of classroom material.
B. Develop critical thinking: Discuss how homework promotes critical thinking skills and problem-solving abilities.
C. Enhance retention: Argue that homework improves memory and strengthens long-term retention of knowledge.

III. Body Paragraph 2: Practical Benefits of Homework

A. Time management: Explain how homework teaches students to manage their time effectively and....

1. The impact of early intervention on speech development in children with multisyllable word challenges
2. Effective strategies for teaching multisyllable words to individuals with language disorders
3. The role of phonological awareness in interventions for multisyllable word difficulties
4. Addressing multisyllable word reading challenges through evidence-based practices
5. The importance of explicit instruction in multisyllable word decoding for struggling readers
6. Multisensory approaches to intervention for multisyllable word difficulties
7. The benefits of vocabulary intervention on multisyllable word recognition and comprehension
8. Exploring the use of technology in interventions for improving multisyllable word reading skills
9. Differentiated instruction for students with diverse needs in multisyllable word intervention....

1. The Impact of Multi-Syllable Interventions on Reading Comprehension in Elementary School Students
2. Exploring the Effectiveness of Multi-Syllable Intervention Strategies for Students with Dyslexia
3. The Importance of Early Intervention for Developing Multi-Syllable Decoding Skills in Young Learners
4. Implementing Multi-Syllable Intervention Programs in ESL Classrooms: Challenges and Strategies
5. A Critical Analysis of Different Approaches to Multi-Syllable Intervention in Special Education Settings
6. Examining the Role of Teacher Training in the Success of Multi-Syllable Intervention Programs
7. The Relationship Between Phonological Awareness and Multi-Syllable Intervention Success
8. Using Technology to Enhance Multi-Syllable Intervention in the Classroom
9. Developing a Comprehensive Multi-Syllable Intervention Plan for Struggling Readers
10.....