Best Answer
The measurement of competition within the civil aviation sector has been a focal point for numerous studies, aiming to understand market dynamics, regulatory impacts, and economic outcomes. One of the seminal works in this area is by Button and Taylor (2000), who discuss the complexities of competition in airline markets, focusing on how different metrics like the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) can be applied to assess market concentration and competition levels. Their analysis underscores the importance of considering both route-specific and network-wide competition, highlighting the limitations of traditional metrics when applied to the aviation industry due to its unique characteristics such as high fixed costs and network effects.
Expanding on this, Zhang and Round (2009) delve into the competitive landscape of the airline industry by examining the effects of airline alliances and mergers. Their study uses a combination of market share analysis and game theory to illustrate how competition can be measured not just by market concentration but also by strategic interactions among airlines. They argue that alliances can both enhance competition by increasing route options and reduce it by creating barriers to entry for new competitors, thus necessitating a nuanced approach to competition measurement.
Further, Brueckner and Pels (2005) explore the impact of airport dominance on competition. Their research introduces the concept of 'airport dominance' as a measure of competition, where the control of slots and gates by a few airlines at major airports can significantly influence competitive dynamics. This study suggests that competition should also be measured by access to critical infrastructure, which can be as crucial as market share in determining competitive outcomes.
In a different vein, Adler and Hanany (2016) propose a multi-dimensional approach to competition measurement, incorporating not only market concentration but also service quality, pricing strategies, and customer satisfaction. Their methodology involves a composite index that reflects various competitive pressures airlines face, providing a more holistic view of competition than traditional economic indicators alone. This approach is particularly relevant in an era where customer experience and service differentiation play significant roles in airline competition.
Lastly, Belobaba et al. (2009) in their book "The Global Airline Industry" provide an extensive review of competition metrics, discussing how different regulatory environments affect competition. They analyze how deregulation in various regions has led to different competitive structures, with some markets showing increased competition while others have seen consolidation. Their work is pivotal in understanding how regulatory frameworks shape competition, suggesting that competition measurement must account for policy impacts.
Sources:
Best Answer
Competition in the civil aviation industry is a complex and dynamic phenomenon that has attracted significant attention from researchers and practitioners. This literature review aims to examine the various approaches used to measure competition within civil aviation and explore the key findings and insights from existing studies.
One common method used to measure competition within the industry is the analysis of market concentration. Market concentration measures the extent to which the market is dominated by a few large firms or is more evenly distributed among a larger number of smaller firms. Researchers often use indices such as the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) or the Concentration Ratio to quantify market concentration and assess the level of competition. Studies have shown that higher levels of market concentration are associated with reduced competition and may lead to higher prices and lower service quality for consumers.
Another approach to measuring competition in civil aviation is through the analysis of fares and pricing strategies. Researchers often examine fare data to determine the extent to which airlines engage in price discrimination and engage in strategic pricing behavior. Studies have found that airlines may use dynamic pricing strategies to maximize revenue and profit, which can have implications for competition and consumer welfare. Price transparency and comparison websites have also emerged as important tools for consumers to compare fares and make informed choices, thus increasing competition among airlines.
Regulatory policies and government intervention also play a significant role in shaping competition within the civil aviation industry. Researchers have studied the impact of airline deregulation on competition and market structure, finding that deregulation has led to increased competition and lower prices for consumers. However, regulatory barriers and government subsidies can distort competition and create barriers to entry for new entrants. Understanding the regulatory environment is crucial for assessing competition within the industry and designing effective competition policy.
In addition to market structure and pricing strategies, researchers have also examined the role of alliances and partnerships in shaping competition within civil aviation. Airline alliances have become increasingly common in the industry, allowing airlines to cooperate on routes, scheduling, and marketing efforts. Studies have found that alliances can lead to increased efficiency and network connectivity, but may also raise concerns about competition and antitrust issues. Understanding the effects of alliances on competition is essential for policymakers and regulators to ensure a level playing field for all market participants.
Overall, competition measurement within civil aviation is a multifaceted and challenging task that requires a comprehensive and holistic approach. By considering factors such as market concentration, pricing strategies, regulatory policies, and alliances, researchers can gain a deeper understanding of the dynamics of competition within the industry. Future research should continue to explore these issues and develop new methodologies to measure competition and assess its impact on consumer welfare and industry performance.
Sources
