Best Answer
The Impact of the Monster Study on Attitudes Towards Speech Therapy
The Monster Study, conducted by Wendell Johnson at the University of Iowa in the 1930s, was a controversial study that sought to investigate the effects of negative feedback on stuttering. The study involved 22 orphans, half of whom were given positive feedback on their speech, while the other half were given negative feedback. The results of the study were devastating, with the children who received negative feedback developing severe stuttering and psychological problems.
The Monster Study had a profound impact on attitudes towards speech therapy. Prior to the study, speech therapy was often seen as a positive and helpful intervention. However, the results of the study raised concerns about the potential for speech therapy to do harm. This led to a decline in the use of speech therapy, and a shift towards more supportive and holistic approaches to stuttering.
In the years since the Monster Study, there has been a growing awareness of the importance of ethical research practices. Researchers are now required to obtain informed consent from participants, and to protect them from harm. The Monster Study is a reminder of the importance of these ethical principles, and the need to ensure that research is conducted in a responsible and humane manner.
The Monster Study and the Ethics of Research
The Monster Study has been widely criticized for its unethical research practices. The study was conducted without the informed consent of the participants, and the children were subjected to harmful psychological treatments. The study also violated the basic principles of research ethics, such as the principle of beneficence (doing no harm) and the principle of justice (treating all participants fairly).
The Monster Study has led to a number of changes in the way that research is conducted. Researchers are now required to obtain informed consent from participants, and to protect them from harm. The study has also led to a greater emphasis on the importance of ethical research practices.
The Impact of the Monster Study on Stuttering Treatment
The Monster Study had a significant impact on the treatment of stuttering. Prior to the study, speech therapy was often seen as a positive and helpful intervention. However, the results of the study raised concerns about the potential for speech therapy to do harm. This led to a decline in the use of speech therapy, and a shift towards more supportive and holistic approaches to stuttering.
In the years since the Monster Study, there has been a growing awareness of the importance of providing supportive and holistic care for people who stutter. Speech therapy is now seen as one of many possible interventions, and it is used in conjunction with other approaches, such as counseling and self-help groups.
Conclusion
The Monster Study was a controversial study that had a profound impact on attitudes towards speech therapy. The study raised concerns about the potential for speech therapy to do harm, and led to a decline in the use of speech therapy. In the years since the study, there has been a growing awareness of the importance of ethical research practices and the importance of providing supportive and holistic care for people who stutter.
//Sources:
//
Best Answer
The Monster Study had a negative impact on attitudes towards speech therapy as it raised ethical concerns about the potential harm that can be caused by labeling children as “stutterers” and using negative reinforcement to correct speech issues. The study highlighted the importance of ethical considerations and the potential for psychological harm in speech therapy practices. This led to a shift towards more ethical and compassionate approaches in speech therapy, focusing on positive reinforcement and building confidence rather than using negative labels and punishments.
Sources
