Verified Document

World Government Essay

¶ … Government: An Unviable Solution to a Complex Need According to Anne-Marie Slaughter, "world government is both infeasible and undesirable," an assertion that is supported by the historical record as well as contemporary experiences. This paper provides a review of the relevant literature to determine why a world government is unviable, as well as the differences between a world government and global governance. A discussion concerning how these concepts relate to world order, globalization, international integration and the rise of new actors is followed by a summary of the research and important findings in the conclusion.

Problems with a World Government

On the one hand, people need global institutions in an increasingly globalized marketplace. For instance, according to Slaughter, "Peoples and their governments around the world need global institutions to solve collective problems that can only be addressed on a global scale. They must be able to make and enforce global rules on a variety of subjects and through a variety of means" (2005, 292). On the other hand, though, global institutions such as the United Nations and various economic fora as markedly different from a true world government. In this regard, Rachman reports that, a world government would require a far more than mere cooperation among countries. Rather, "It would be an entity with state-like characteristics, backed by a body of laws" (Rachman 2008, 1). The "United States of Europe (GmbH)" that has emerged in the form of the European Union could serve as a model for a world government, Rachman suggests, for several reasons, including:

1. The EU has a supreme court, a currency, thousands of pages of law, a large civil service and the ability to deploy military force.

2. It is increasingly clear that the most difficult issues facing national governments are international...

It could be done. The transport and communications revolutions have shrunk the world so that for the first time in human history, world government of some sort is now possible.
The simple fact that something is possible, though, does not make it desirable (for instance, it is possible for the United States to destroy the world with thermonuclear weapons). Consequently, Rachman (2008, 1) adds that, "A change in the political atmosphere suggests that "global governance" framework could emerge in the near future and these issues are discussed further below.

World Government vs. Global Governance

From a strictly pragmatic perspective, is it reasonable to suggest that most people do not want an overarching governmental framework in place that erodes their civil liberties and directs their day-to-day behaviors. Indeed, some of the world's problems can be attributed to the manner in which arbitrary geopolitical lines have been drawn. In response, according to Weiss, in recent years, "Mainstream thinking about international cooperation has shifted decidedly away from beefing up the United Nations and other intergovernmental organizations and toward what many of us now call 'global governance'" (2009, 3). When it comes to distinguishing between a "one-world order" as evinced by a world government and the mechanics required to ensure that international commerce can proceed, the semantics become nebulous, though. For instance, Weiss points out that the term "Governance," not only "represents of course the range of both informal and formal values, norms, practices, and institutions," but that "It is most useful to think of global governance at any moment as reflecting the capacity of the international system to provide government-like services in the absence of a world government" (2009, 3.). From a modern perspective, it is disingenuous, though, to suggest that it is possible to create the types of global frameworks that are required to administer and sustain progress at the local level. These same issues caused one of the bloodiest and most costly wars…

Sources used in this document:
References

Rachman, Gideon. 2008, December 8. "And now for a world government." Financial

Times.com. [online] available: http://ft.com.

Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 2005. "Government Networks, World Order and the L20." In Reforming

from the Top: A Leaders' 20 Summit. 2005. John English, Ramesh Thakur & Andrew F.
available: http://ft.com.
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Government the Issues of Government in Today's
Words: 688 Length: 2 Document Type: Essay

Government The issues of government in today's world are quite interesting, elusive and difficult to ascertain. Slaughter & Burke-White's (2006) article illuminated many points about the relationship to domestic governments and international organizations seeking to rule and serve over the local institutions. The purpose of this essay is to discuss some of the important aspects of international government and how they relate to smaller, domesticated governments. This essay will suggest

International Law and World Government
Words: 1783 Length: 6 Document Type: Essay

Reasoning with clear ideas and examples, what are at least two of the main justifications for the legitimacy, authority, and usefulness of the UN, and two of the main criticisms? Legitimacy means the acceptance and right of a given authority such as a law for governance, or a specified regime. Legitimacy refers to a whole set of governance system. On the other hand, authority refers to a specified position in a

Government and Its Role and
Words: 1157 Length: 4 Document Type: Essay

In this case, individuals are entitled to produce goods and services to meet their human need instead of private profit (Wolff, 2012). Prevention for Power and Privileges under Social Contract: While social contract provides power and privileges to all members of the society, ordinary people are usually prevented from executing the power and privilege that they are entitled to through various ways. Some of these ways include the state's legitimacy claims

Government & Policy the Joyan
Words: 1138 Length: 4 Document Type: Creative Writing

Also, a very liberal strategy like the one that Mexico took after the NAFTA agreements is dangerous to a newly independent state. Extreme liberalization worked well for Mexico because a large and confident Mexico felt like it could benefit greatly from increased trade and labor transfer with the United States, without being pushed around in the agreement, and Canada helped to maintain neutrality. The Joyan Islands, on the other

World War I Was Believed to Be
Words: 1167 Length: 3 Document Type: Term Paper

World War I was believed to be the last general war that this world had to go through. Due to massive losses during the first major conflict, people believed that no country will ever want such an event to happen. However, twenty years after the Treaty of Versailles, Britain and France declared war on Germany. The Second World War caused the death of many more people than the first. Unlike

World War II or the
Words: 1623 Length: 5 Document Type: Term Paper

Governments turned out to be involved with original subjects for instance rationing, manpower distribution, home defense, removal in the time of air raid, and reply to job by an enemy control. The confidence and mind of the persons replied to management and publicity. Classically women were militarized to an exceptional degree. The achievement in rallying financial production was a main factor in secondary battle processes. Altogether of the power

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now