Therefore, services have been enhanced to ensure easy access and equitable delivery of resources and services" (p. 384).
Clearly, then, although the mission of many university libraries to provide the resources and tools students need to achieve successful academic outcomes has not changed in substantive ways in recent years, technological innovations have demanded that they transform the manner in which they achieve these missions. A survey of university librarians conducted by Moore and Anderson (2003) determined that, "By far the major thrust of the libraries surveyed was the inclusion of information literacy skills into the curriculum, either imbedded into the discipline-specific information or as assessable tests within foundation or first-year subjects" (p. 382). The provision of these types of services, Moore and Anderson suggest, may represent a departure from previous approaches but represent the types of initiatives that are needed today. For instance, the authors note that, "These initiatives are a far cry from voluntary information literacy or reader education classes offered by university libraries during orientation week. It reflects a growing trend in higher education to embody generic attributes, such as information and it literacy, into the curriculum" (p. 383).
These are some difficult goals for many libraries already squeaking by on modest budgets, but these goals can be reasonably stated to be more achievable if existing resources are used to their best advantage. From a strictly pragmatic perspective, because the costs associated with low employee morale and employee turnover are well established, identifying opportunity to improve library staff's sense of job satisfaction and what factors contribute to their motivation at work represent valuable steps to achieving the optimum use of library resources. Therefore, making any workplace more productive by improving employee morale just makes good business sense; however, "happy" employees do not necessarily translate into "productive" employees, and it is important to recognize the relationship between job satisfaction and work motivation, and these issues are discussed further below.
Job Satisfaction.
The definition provided by Anderson (1984) indicates that, "Job satisfaction refers to both general and specific work satisfactions. The specific satisfactions included both intrinsic and extrinsic satisfactions, as well as satisfaction with pay, job security, peers and co-workers, supervision, and opportunities for personal growth on the job" (p. 9). According to Ting (1997), "Early organizational theorists such as Abraham Maslow and Frederick Herzberg stated that job satisfaction is caused by individuals' desires to fulfill personal needs, which include intrinsic and extrinsic needs. Researchers adopting this approach argue that an individual's job satisfaction is determined by the degree to which job characteristics will fulfill the person's needs" (p. 313). The growing body of research into job satisfaction consistently indicates that pay satisfaction and the need for career growth are two of the most important predictors of job satisfaction, based on their strong theoretical linkage to the formation of individual job attitudes (Ting).
Individuals who are satisfied with their pay and promotional opportunities would therefore experience a greater cost in leaving their organizations; as a result, they are likely to develop more positive attitudes toward their jobs (Ting). A number of studies to date have also found that the diminishment of pay and lack of promotional opportunities are associated with job dissatisfaction of public employees and their tendency to leave the civil service (Ting). Generally speaking, Pool suggests that the five essential dimensions for measuring job satisfaction are (a) the job itself, (b) pay, - promotion opportunities, (d) supervision, and (e) co-workers. Among these, pay and supervision are frequently cited as leading elements. For instance, Pool notes that, "A leader's behavior or leadership style may influence the subordinate's job satisfaction. Leadership behavior is defined as the ability of a leader to influence subordinates in performing at the highest level within an organizational framework" (p. 273).
According to Carson and her colleagues (2001), librarians in particular may be compelled to remain with a particular organization even when their job satisfaction diminishes because of a commitment to the profession itself. For instance, these authors emphasize that, "To cope with the stress and uncertainties, many workers have turned to their individual careers to provide them with the sense of security that is no longer supplied by their organizations. This commitment to a particular career or occupation provides the worker with greater control over job mobility and the circumstances...
Job Satisfaction There is a distinct difference between job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Job satisfaction relates specifically to the job. While this is influenced by organizational factors, the job itself can be satisfactory even when there is little commitment to the organization. Either one can be a source of motivation, but it is important for management of an organization to know which dynamic is at play, and which one might be
At the level of the individual worker, motivation and job satisfaction among other things, generate a sense of security and confidence. Moreover, it offers them the opportunity for flexibility where they are able to apply varied approaches in meeting work requirements (Adeyinka et al., 2007, pp. 3-15). This makes the work environment interesting thus providing the employees with the pleasure and urge to facing their day-to-day lives at the workplace.
Employee Motivation Job Satisfaction Employee Motivation and Job Satisfaction There is great interest in understanding the phenomenon of satisfaction or dissatisfaction at work. (Spector, 1997) However, it paradoxically, despite the dramatic proliferation of scientific literature on the job satisfaction, can not speak, however, a parallel progress in investigations, as the progress made? and are not very rewarding significant. (Furnham et al., 2005) The job satisfaction comes from being in the last year's one
The time frame was from one month February 1st to February 29th. Single-item questions were used while basing the question in terms of "how satisfied are you with your job?" Three response scales were used: normal, very satisfied, not at all satisfied. The framed question was to measure the independent variables, job satisfaction, based on level of job satisfaction from the time they have spent in their work place, (Scott
Job Satisfaction According to (Hulin & Judge, 2003), job satisfaction is viewed a multidimensional psychological response one has towards a their job. The responses are affective, cognitive behavioral (Hulin & Judge, 2003). There is however no clear agreement of what job satisfaction stands for given the wide usage of the term. Vroom in his definition focuses on employee's role in the work place defining job satisfaction as the effective orientation of
Job Satisfaction in Nursing Levels of Job satisfaction in nursing in relation to generational differences The contemporary society has suffered an acute shortage of nurses within the public and the government sponsored hospitals. Indeed the shortage is so intense that it was and still is viewed as one of the impediments that stand on the way of fully experiencing the positives of the Obama Healthcare program that was recently introduced. This has
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now