¶ … God I Don't Understand: Reflections on Tough Questions of Faith
Preface and Introduction
The Preface explains why Wright chose to write this book. He felt that it could be a more personal and humble approach to God than that achieved in his other books, which were about "knowing God." In this book, Wright wants to address some of the more confusing aspects of God. He justifies this approach by showing how God Himself points out that His ways are not our ways in Scripture. This is a valid point, and what Wright is doing is drawing attention to the fact that we are not God's equals and therefore should not try to humanize Him but rather should try to understand that He knows and sees all and therefore has a good reason for why He commands and does things that might seem disturbing or odd to us.
However, in Wright's Introduction, he explains his struggles with the things God allows to happen, such as why God allows some to suffer more than others. He notes that as he grows older, he seems to understand God less and less, though his love and trust are unwavering. There appears to be some disconnect here and it is this disconnect that the author is attempting to resolve. As Wright notes, the best we can do is at least try to get rid of some of the answers to our questions that are incorrect and which lead us away from the truth or from a better understanding of God -- even if we cannot arrive at a complete comprehension of Him (after all, we do not enjoy the beatific vision, that is, see Him face-to-face here on earth). But Wright follows in the footsteps of Abraham, who is the first Biblical person to question God directly regarding God's fair dealings with man. Starting, therefore, with Abraham, Wright runs down the list of Old Testament characters who speak to God and have an intimate conversation with Him, often questioning Him, that helps us today to put into perspective our own frustrations. From Abraham on down to Hagar, Moses, Naomi, David, Elijah, Job, and so on, right down to Christ Himself on the cross when he cries out, "My God, why have you forsaken me?" -- all of this points to the puzzling question that remains a mystery. Why does God do what He does? Indeed, it is a good question and not one that we should shy away from, because it shows the depth of our concern, grief, feeling, etc. Yet, it should not shake our faith either, if we have learned our lessons from Job, David, and Christ. Faith is our anchor, as Wright concludes in his Introduction.
Chapter 1
While the mystery of iniquity is one that will not go away, there is no question about moral evil, Wright asserts in Chapter 1. It is just something that one must accept. Moral evil is explained very clearly as a result of Satan's fall (due to pride) and Adam's fall (due to temptation) -- this was the foundation of sin in the world and of suffering. This was moral evil and in turn there appeared natural evil. Suffering does not always have to proceed directly from sin, for sometimes it can be an indirect effect. But it does have its root or seed in sin, somewhere down the line -- in the original sin of Adam and Eve. This is the logical answer. Yet there is the other question, the human, emotional question that is not satisfied by logic: the question of how God can allow such evil and suffering to go on.
Wright explores this question by analyzing Job and Psalm 130 as well as other books of the Old Testament to develop a better understanding of evil and why God permits it. This helps the intellect to gain better control of the emotional perplexity that we can feel as a result of frustration. Nonetheless, we are still perplexed at the existence of evil -- that it should exist at all -- when in the light of reason it makes no sense. Wright states that this is actually a good thing to realize. Evil should not make sense to us and we should be perplexed and frightened by it. It is horrific and wrong and unjust...
Introduction The God of the Old Testament has been viewed by scholars as something different from that of the New Testament. This mischaracterization is often produced by placing emphasis in the Old Testament on the God’s insistence that infidels be dealt with in a bloody manner (Deuteronomy 9:4-5), whereas God in the New Testament appears to preach mercy and charity and turning the other cheek (Matthew 5:38-40). Yet what the scholars
Christopher Wright's book In contemporary times, many modern and post-modern Christian churches and denominations focus almost explicitly on deconstructing passages in the New Testament to reinforce the value of Jesus and his effect on Christianity. As such, there has been a dearth of emphasis on the Old Testament and its role in not only facilitating the New Testament, but also in influencing the life and position of Jesus as the
The Kingdom of God annotated bibliography And Essay Part I: Introduction with Thesis Statement The Kingdom of God is a much different kingdom than the earthly kingdom the Pharisees were expecting. What characterizes the kingdom of God? Isaiah 11:1-9 describes a restoration of innocence, in which there is no more disharmonic world but rather a world in which everyone and everything is at peace. Romans 14:16-19 relates to this passage, as it
(It will be recalled that Wright's then unpublished Lawd Today served as a working model for The Outsider.) Cross, in his daily dealings with the three women and his fellow postal workers feel something akin to nausea. His social and legal obligations have enslaved him. He has inherited from his mother a sense of guilt and foreboding regarding his relationship to women and his general awareness of amoral physical
Public Passions In "The Ethics of Living Jim Crow," Richard Wright provided a brief autobiographical sketch of his life growing up in the segregated South. He described how he learned about the laws of Jim Crow in the South, and the unwritten code of ethics or manners that all blacks should follow in the presence of whites. Fox example, some informal rules held that blacks must always address a white man
' Religion is belief in the existence of a supreme being while science is a study to explain the how. The main conflict of these two disciplines begins with the concept of life. Religion explains that God is the creator and giver of life, whereas scientists argue that life evolved from a microorganism. The debate between religion and science is highly controversial but I choose to take the stand of the
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now