Verified Document

Who Is Responsible For Initiating The Cold War Essay

Related Topics:

Stalin and the Grand Alliance

The Grand Alliance had all but begun to crack by the end of WWII, though it remained intact if only in name up to the end of the 1940s. To some degree, the crumbling of the Alliance by 1949 was due in part by Stalin and his paranoia over what the West was plotting. On the other hand, the Alliance could be said to have been nothing more than a ploy by the Western powers to lure Stalin along, getting Russia to take on Germany directly and decisively, while conspiring amongst themselves on how to divvy up the spoils of war. The fact of the matter is that Stalin did not have a monopoly on paranoia. Churchill and Roosevelt had entertained just as much of it as Stalin did and Churchill’s discomfort at the Big Three summits (Tehran in 1943 and 1944, Yalta in 1945 and Potsdam in 1945) showed just how tense the relationship had become between Churchill and Stalin. Neither trusted the other, and though FDR was able to ease some of that tension by his personal charisma, his death ushered Truman onto the stage—and the latter had every ambition to put the Soviet Union in its place (which he felt he did by dropping two atomic bombs on Russia’s neighbor in 1945 in what could only be called a sheer and uncalled for demonstration of absolute force). Thus, how the Allied leaders acted on their own paranoia may have been different (Churchill drank, Stalin purged, Roosevelt, Truman, and later Eisenhower all turned to building up the military), but the Grand Alliance itself was never really that substantially built: it did not rest on sturdy foundations of trust and respect to begin with.
The Grand Alliance was entered into more for practical purposes than it was for ideological reasons. The U.S., the UK, and Russia all stood to gain from Germany’s destruction. In the post-War world, each of the three would vie for power—but the mutual distrust underlying their relationship would surface. Stalin would demonstrate this distrust in his increasingly paranoid acts in the 1940s—but his paranoia was almost certainly not the main reason for the failure of the Grand Alliance. The Grand Alliance was doomed from the beginning, because it was in reality an alliance built on sand, meant to serve a geopolitical purpose—i.e., the defeat of Germany: and once that purpose was fulfilled, the Alliance for all intents and purposes was no longer needed—for at that point it was every world power for himself. Stalin felt by 1944 that the US and the UK were delaying to open a second front against Germany (they were) and that the Soviets were doing most...
Stalin’s paranoia was not unjustified: the US had stepped into WWI at the last minute to alter the peace process—and Stalin could see the same thing playing out again in 1944 and 1945. When Stalin insisted on occupying Bornholm at the end of the war, the Germans refused to surrender to anyone but the Western Allies. Stalin aggressively bombed Bornholm and then oversaw the invasion of a region that had largely been untouched by war violence up till then. This aggression on Stalin’s part in 1945 was rooted in his deep suspicion of the Western Allies taking the spoils for themselves—but this essentially what the Western Allies had in mind.
With the end of WWII, the Cold War began (and Stalin’s invasion of Denmark in 1945 could very well mark that moment). But it was not entirely born out of his paranoia. The Cold War was a continuation of the hot war that came to a close with the defeat of Germany and the submission of Japan, a new chapter based on the simmering conflict between the East and the West, a power play between the two dominant forces. Stalin’s paranoia did not wholly bring it about, though his paranoia increased with his recognition of the fact that the West was not going to play nice with Russia any longer. But just as a feedback loop will reintroduce new information into the old algorithm, Stalin’s behavior served as justification (in the eyes of the West) for more severe actions against the wartime ally. In other words, sanctions led to paranoia which led to more sanctions and so on. Nor was the paranoia all on Stalin’s side. Truman wanted to demonstrate his bravado by decimating two cities in Japan with the Bomb—an act of merciless cruelty that had as much to do with paranoia as anything. The effect, of course, was that with the introduction of this new destructive technology, no world power could feel safe unless it too possessed it. And so the arms race began.

Truman’s demonstration of ballistic force in Japan was just as much responsible for crumbling the Grand Alliance as any paranoia coming from Stalin. The creation of the CIA in 1947 and the establishment of spy bases across Europe and Asia also did not help the Alliance to stand. Radio Free Europe, for example, was a CIA front operation designed to monitor and agitate Communist forces in Eastern Europe and to oppose the ideology of the Soviet Union. Stalin’s paranoia in the 1940s could be argued to be said justified by the bellicosity of Truman and the rise of the military-industrial complex under Eisenhower, as well…

Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Global Security in the Post Cold War
Words: 2227 Length: 5 Document Type: Essay

failed state is never able to sustain itself as a members of the international community (Helman & Rathner,1993).Rotberg (2002) pointed out that state failure can occur in various dimensions. These dimensions include security, political representation, economic prosperity as well as the distribution of income (Rotberg,2002,p.85).His argument is that nations that failure of states occurs as a result of their failure to deliver positive political gains to their citizens. These

Post War Iraq a Paradox in the Making Legitimacy Vs. Legality
Words: 14187 Length: 35 Document Type: Term Paper

Post War Iraq: A Paradox in the Making: Legitimacy vs. legality The regulations pertaining to the application of force in International Law has transformed greatly from the culmination of the Second World War, and again in the new circumstances confronting the world in the aftermath of the end of the Cold War. Novel establishments have been formed, old ones have withered away and an equally enormous quantity of intellectual writing has

1950's Korean War, North Korea Democratic People's
Words: 7870 Length: 23 Document Type: Essay

1950's Korean War, North Korea (Democratic People's Republic Korea) and South Korea (Republic Korea) Were Exploited by the Superpowers for Their Own Agendas The closing decade of the 20th century witnessed the end of the Cold War as the Soviet Union collapsed and its former Warsaw Pact allies flocked to join their former enemies in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. The end of the Cold War also resulted in the

Soviet-Afgan War Conflict Analysis Focus
Words: 5116 Length: 18 Document Type: Thesis

(Harvey, 2003) the suspicion of the United States of the "Soviet Expansionist tendencies" had increased by the 1970s and Harvey states as well that "The pervasive mentality of Washington officials during these years was dominated by the communist domino theory which led many Washington politicians to believe that the Soviet Union sought to take over the entire world." (2003) the United States had always received a safeguard provided by

Politics of War - Kennedy
Words: 1888 Length: 6 Document Type: Research Proposal

Why? Because, for the most part, LBJ ignored them. He would invite the leadership and even critics to the White House quite frequently and listen as they offered suggestions. Usually, however, he would end up lecturing them about the wisdom of the decisions he had already predetermined. It is interesting to note, that, throughout the war, LBJ actually received far more support from Republicans than he did his own party.

Concentration Camps of WWII --
Words: 4330 Length: 15 Document Type: Term Paper

"Some Holocaust survivors have said that not only did the barbed-wire surrounding Auschwitz tremble and howl, but also the tortured earth itself moaned with the voices of the victims" (ISurvived.org). The first waves of prisoners arrived at Auschwitz in March, 1942, and from there on trains filled with people arrived on a regular basis, with the last years of the war seeing tens of thousands of prisoners arriving every day.

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now