Verified Document

What Is The Purpose Of Price Reasonableness  Essay

Price and Cost The discussion below is a study determining price reasonableness and what the basic difference actually is between price and cost analysis. There shall also be an overview of how each is utilized today. In regards to sorting out this subject, the 2009 work by Paula B. Compton known as Federal Acquisition shall be looked at.

Purpose for Determining Price Reasonableness

There has been some struggle in various agencies concerning fair and reasonable price determinations in their energy savings performance contracts (ESPCs) predominantly since this financing vehicle is rather rare and new in the federal sector. Every branch of the government has skill in executing appropriations- funded contracts, and there are several effectual techniques to guarantee price reasonableness in these contracts. However, the execution of an ESPC basically varies from the procedures utilized in more conventional methods of contracting (Shonder and Atkin, 2005). Specifically, the techniques of determining price reasonableness most common to the federal contracting officers are usually inapplicable to ESPCs. The majority of the federal ESPC projects are executed as delivery orders under one of the energy or defense department's indefinite-quantity, indefinite-delivery (IDIQ) ESPCs in the absence of a real price competition. Hence at the contractor selection phase, competition cannot be utilized to assure price reasonableness. ESPC projects are comparable to design-build contracts, only that the energy services company (ESCO) basically comes up with a firm-fixed price plan at a point when the ESCO-developed design is just around 30% from completion. Missing total cost information, it is not easy for the government to conduct traditional cost evaluation or come up with an independent cost approximation to relate with the ESCO's plan

Federal Acquisition: Key Issues and Guidance

This is an important guide to comprehension and working in the complicated world of federal government contracting. It provides short but detailed explanations of the main stages and important duties in the contracting procedure. Put down in plain...

Federal agencies are obliged to treat their suppliers in a just manner in addition to paying reasonable and just prices for the supplies. Paula Compton concentrates on the very difficult sections of federal contracting, emphasizing on the shortages mentioned frequently by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) and Inspector General (IG) reports and audits, for instance (Compton, 2009):
Insufficient cost or price analysis

Not conducting market research

Inadequate work reports

Insufficient independent government cost approximations

Breach of the bona fide needs rule

A good cost analysis can assist agencies in making the correct determination with respect to price reasonableness (Compton, 2009). Hence, when it all comes down to it, the aim for determining price reasonableness is to make sure that the federal government pays just and reasonable prices.

Difference between Price and Cost Analysis and Use

The Federal Acquisition Regulations System (FARWs) is developed for the publication and codification of standardized rules and procedures for possession by every government agency. The Federal Acquisition Regulations System comprises of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), which is the major document, and agency acquisition rules that execute the FAR. The FAR system, however, does not contain internal agency guidance of the kind illustrated in 1.301 (a) (2).

The dream for the Federal Acquisition System is to provide the finest value service or product to the customer, at the same time upholding the trust of the public in accomplishing public policy aims (Federal Acquisition Regulation). Those taking part in the acquisition procedure are meant to observe teamwork and have empowerment to make decisions within their region of accountability.

(b) The Federal Acquisition System shall (Federal Acquisition Regulation):

(1) Please the client in terms of price, quality and…

Sources used in this document:
References

(n.d.). Home Acquisition.GOV. Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) | Acquisition.GOV. Retrieved July 26, 2015, from http://www.acquisition.gov/?q=browsefar

(n.d.). The Federal Transit Administration. FTA - Third Party Procurement FAQ Search - Cost/Price Analysis. Retrieved July 26, 2015, from http://www.fta.dot.gov/13057_6116.html

Compton, P.B. (2009). Federal Acquisition: Key Issues and Guidance. Management Concepts Inc. Retrieved from https://books.google.com/books/about/Federal_Acquisition.html?id=uSgMBWJeb40C

CON 124 -- Contract Execution, Lesson 1. Identify The Elements Of The Purchase Request Package. Retrieved from: files sent by customer
Shonder, J., & Atkin, E. (2005, January). NOTICE. Determining Price Reasonableness in Federal ESPCs. Retrieved July 26, 2015, from http://www1.eere.energy.gov/femp/pdfs/5_5_pricereasonableness.pdf
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Pricing and Contract Integration: Procurement
Words: 4747 Length: 15 Document Type: Essay

Procurement: Pricing and Contract Integration Federal procurement contracting has over the last few years been a subject of increased public and congressional interest, particularly because of the growing concern that noncompetitive procurement practices may be on the rise in the assignment of government contracts. The rising number of cases and public reports implicating federal agencies in alleged misconduct involving non-competitive contracts has drawn the attention of both Congress and the Executive

Rachel and Choo Hospital Choo Choo's Liability
Words: 2132 Length: 8 Document Type: Term Paper

Rachel and Choo Hospital Choo Choo's Liability The fact that Rachel was initially discharged from the emergency department following examination by a physician with nothing more than a prescription for pain medication when she was in fact suffering form a very serious blood infection could definitely leave Choo Hospital exposed to litigation. There are several key elements of this case, as briefly as it has been described, that lead to this potential

Protest Centered on Alleged Misevaluation
Words: 878 Length: 3 Document Type: Article Review

Other protests presented by CIS included unfair evaluation of OTG - another presenting company. Complaints here included vague requirements; insufficient detail as to why they rejected proposal; apparent duplicity (as in the case of implying that three of its present employees were available for position); and ambiguous and vague language in its blanket statements. The decision was that the agency misevaluated the proposal of CIS as well as that of OTG,

Does the Fisher, Ury Model Work
Words: 29882 Length: 120 Document Type: Dissertation

Negotiation Skills A High Impact Negotiations Model: An Answer to the Limitations of the Fisher, Ury Model of Principled Negotiations This study aims to discover the ways in which blocked negotiations can be overcome by testing the Fisher, Ury model of principled negotiation against one of the researcher's own devising, crafted after studying thousands of negotiation trainees from over 100 multinational corporations on 5 continents. It attempts to discern universal applications of

Profession Give Some Right Ideas and Some
Words: 2452 Length: 6 Document Type: Term Paper

profession give some right ideas and some wrong ideas. Accounting is a process through which persons come to know the state of the business. It is used by the owners to find out their own performance in the activity they have taken up, by the government to collect the amount of taxes that are due by the investors in order to decide as to whether they should invest in

Contract Law the Author of This Response
Words: 664 Length: 2 Document Type: Essay

Contract Law The author of this response is asked to offer a response to a few major questions. First, the author is to explain the purpose and importance of Mitchell v. Finney Lock Seeds as it relates to contract law. The author is asked to relate Section 55 of the Sale of Goods Act of 1979 to Schedule 2 of the Unfair Contract Terms Act of 1977. The author of this

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now