In efforts aimed at improving the diplomatic ties with some Middle East countries like Pakistan, the United States embarked on strategies of cooling hostilities with these countries. For a long period, some Middle East countries have been considered as nations which sponsor terrorism particularly against the United States. This notion has always contributed to diplomatic hostilities between the United States and these countries. Diplomacy is an effective way of fighting terrorism that yields positive results. For instance, the improvement of diplomatic ties between the U.S. And Pakistan has transformed the public image of the U.S. The United States has also continued to strengthen friendly ties with most of its friendly and non-friendly nations like the South Korea, a hardliner in its bid to developing nuclear weapons.
Due to the improvement of diplomatic ties, the United States dropped North Korea from its terrorism blacklist in October 2008. The then U.S. President, George W. Bush decided to drop North Korea from the terrorism blacklist because North Korea earned the move by showing enough cooperation on broad principles (Kessler par, 3). North Korea was deleted from the U.S. list of state sponsors not only as a result of its broad cooperation for verifying its nuclear claims, but because of improved diplomatic relationships also. President Bush made this decision contrary to his 2002 declaration that nations such as North Korea, Iran and Iraq constituted an axis of evil because of their terrorist allies. The decision to drop North Korea from the terrorism blacklist was a striking development in the administration's foreign policy geared toward a more realistic effort to open contacts and strike understandings with countries like Iran and Syria. These countries were once considered too belligerent for diplomatic contact but the diplomatic ties with North Korea proved otherwise.
A further diplomatic effort in the fight against global terrorism is the involvement of the intelligence unit in improving diplomatic ties with other nations. Currently, the intelligence unit is working tirelessly in its cooperation with some leaders in the Muslim world who are perceived to be non-partisans to the harsh stands taken by their countries. The intelligence unit is involved in cooperation with such leaders who also seem to command a large support from their fellow country men.
Impacts of U.S. Presence in Iraq and Middle East:
As part of its strategy in fighting global terrorism, the presence of the United States in Iraq and the Middle East has yielded both positive and negative impacts. However, there are varied opinions everywhere concerning this strategy by the United States. For instance, the presence of the United States in Iraq has been perceived by some as civil war while other people consider it to be sectarian violence. Regardless of the difference in opinion, one of the biggest dilemmas is what would happen if the United States was to leave Iraq and the Middle East. Most probably, if the United States left these countries, there would be some internal war and the rise of global terrorism.
Many people think that the United States is in Iraq and the Middle East for its regional interests as well as being the self-elected policeman of the world. This is despite of the fact that the presence of the United States in both Iraq and the Middle East has not only reduced global terrorism but also protected America from terrorist attacks. Those who argue that the presence of the U.S. In these countries for the reasons mentioned above downplay the significance of the positive effects.
On the positive note, the presence of the United States in Iraq and the Middle East has helped to control the threat and growth of terrorism. Through deployment of its military, the United States has provided protection in these areas and controlled attacks against America. This control of the threat of global terrorism has been as a result of a number of positive factors that include:
Restoration of Peace:
As mentioned earlier, some governments' policies in helping the youths of their...
(Reese, Killgore & Ritter 22) Another well documented myth is that Iraq and some active terrorist organization, of which Iraq is not one, have benefited from the dissolution of the Soviet Union, through the proliferation of Soviet weapons scientists and their knowledge. A another fear of WMD proliferation was through Soviet "brain drain." Yet there has been no open-source evidence indicating that WMD materials or knowledge has reached terrorist hands from
Terrorism Justified? According to Purpura (2007), terrorism as a term does not have a fixed definition. This effectively means that its usage and application is largely hinged on a myriad of viewpoints, be they political or religious. In this text, I concern myself with terrorism; its justification, usage and application. The Use of Terrorism by Powerful Governments to Delegitimize Less Powerful Governments Though terrorism cannot be seen to be a wholly biased
Terrorism The term "terrorism" is profoundly political, as can be seen by the numerous definitions of terrorism and the lack of a globally-agreed description. The myriad definitions show nations struggling to define "terrorism" in self-serving ways. Efforts to clarify and unify those definitions vary from legalistic to nearly bombastic. After listing many definitions from different nations and from within the United States, itself, this paper examines a legalistic attempt to lay
Terrorism Influences Terrorism has no specific definition and its definition largely depends upon the viewpoint of an individual for example Samuel Adams (a well-known revolutionary fireband) or Thomas Gefferson would have been terrorist from British perspective but they have been Great heroes from American perspective. Take the case of George Washington who was previously fighting with British army against French and was loyalist of British crown but later on he sought
Global Jihad, a Myth or Reality The Jihad is often associated with a certain Muslim fight against the unfaithful, one that has been going on for decades now and which is unlikely to stop in coming years. However, despite this sustainable development of the notion and everything it entangles, it cannot be stated without a doubt that this is an obvious reality. This assumption is made based on the fact that
Terrorism refers to threats, violence, bombings, etc. Terrorism is known to have a long history, but even today, the reason behind this terror by the super powers and the government remains explicit. The acts of terror are very common these days and could be found in current political and social environment. A part of terror is still confused when it is applied in the actual present world (Robb, 2007). Where the
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now