Waiting for Superman
Sociology
Film: Waiting for Superman
This is a disturbing film about the education system and the resistance to change. Students are caught in the middle. Before you start watching this film, recall your high school education experience -- both good and bad parts. Then think about taking on the role of a teacher -- what kind of teacher would you be? What would it be like to have been your teacher in your classroom?
At the end of your documentary review, connecting the film to course content, please address these questions.
According to the movie, what are the problems in education? List them below
Financial aspects to education -- although spending per student has increased, the quality of education has not improved or even diminished in many areas.
The U.S. is not keeping pace with the rest of the world -- the U.S. education systems ranks far below that of other industrialized countries.
Number of poor teachers -- the quality of teaching professionals is poor in the U.S. And many of the teachers are just not qualified to teach.
Poor public school systems -- the film offers charter schools as a possible alternative to underperforming school districts.
Separating kids by ability -- classrooms are divided by the perceptions of a child's ability which is "tracked" and excludes many kids from developing their abilities.
2. According to the movie, how should the problems in our educational system be fixed?
The director seems to believe that bad teachers and the teachers unions are the fundamental cause of the low performing schools. The solution presented mainly consists of privatizing school, through charter schools, and taking away the power of teacher unions.
3. To what extent are
In the end the students are not accepted through the use of a lottery and it is an emotional loss for the families as well as the viewer. The director paints a somewhat hopeless view for parents. However, I believe that parents can have a much bigger role in their child's academic success than what the film seems to suggest.
4. To what extent do you agree with the movie's argument that teachers are the main factor behind school success or failure?
It is an interesting position that the film takes -- that teachers and unions are part of the problem. However, if you look at the best systems in the world, such as the Scandinavian countries, they have incredibly strong labor unions and the highest rated education systems in the world.
5. What factors do you think should be taken into consideration when evaluating teacher performance and determining pay levels?
This is a difficult question. With pay performance systems, the result is often that teachers will focus more on the results of standardized testing than the quality of education in general. However, good teachers should be rewarded in some way for their performances. Yet the solution to this position is unclear and represents many of the conflicting viewpoints on the subject.
6. Do you agree with Ayers' argument that student poverty and lack of school funding play a major role in school success or failure? Why or why not?
Yes. I do. Schools are the primary source of education however they are not the only sources. Parents are a big part of the equation. When the parents are absent, have to work two jobs, or have other…
Film: A Class Divided The documentary film A Class Divided has become a standard for exploring the origin of racial prejudice in a diverse society. Jane Elliott was a third-grade teacher in 1968 at the time of Reverend Martin Luther King's assassination. Elliott devised an exercise to conduct with her students to help them understand how racism and stereotyping emerge and are maintained in groups of people. Using eye color as
Ken Burns' Documentary: The National Parks -- America's Best Idea The reputation Ken Burns has acquired over the years is a glowing, highly lauded reputation, and for good reason. His use of history, video and well-written narrative has won awards and has entertained and informed all those who have come into contact with his documentaries. The documentary to be critiqued and reviewed in this paper is The National Parks -- America's
The way that it uses John Alpert, a therapist who consulted a great deal of important Wall Street figures, with the purpose of showing how these people were basically no different from ordinary criminals (seeing prostitutes and using cocaine) when considering the way they spent money further contributes to increasing the terror of the thought that they were in charge of the world's finances. More precisely, it provided very
(Berardinelli) Overall, the movies received lots of appreciation and did great business on the box office. Film was also shown in Iran where American films are not supposed to be shown. Film also received positive response by the critics. Most of them also felt that the movie depicted one side of point-of-view but in spite of that, it was worth watching. Fahrenheit 9/11 became the highest grossing documentary of all
From this came our insistence on the drama of the doorstep" (cited by Hardy 14-15). Grierson also notes that the early documentary filmmakers were concerned about the way the world was going and wanted to use all the tools at hand to push the public towards greater civic participation. With the success of Drifters, Grierson was able to further his ideas, but rather than directing other films, he devoted his time
Richardis a documentary film made by Al Pacino in 1996 and is based on the historical play Richard III written by William Shakespeare. Richard III remained the King of England for just two years only (1483-1485). In Richard III, Shakespeare has sketched how Machiavellian tendency of Richard III enabled him to gain power despite his brother Clarence being prior to Richard III in line of succession. Since Richard III
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now