Verified Document

Vygotsky And Piaget Learning Education Theory Essay

Introduction Two of the most influential theorists of education, Jean Piaget and Lev Vygotsky, continue to influence educational policy and pedagogical practice. Both of these theorists focus on developmental psychology to underscore their respective theories of learning. A better understanding of Piaget’s and Vygotsky’s contributions to education and child development can help clarify historical continuities and how to promote evidence-based educational practices and policies.

Summary of the Theories

Piaget and Vygotsky were both interested in how children learn, grow, and develop psychologically and socially. Both are constructivists, believing that individuals construct meaning through their lived experiences. Moreover, both Vygotsky and Piaget believed that children learn progressively, building upon prior knowledge in stages of development. However, Vygotsky is known more for sociocultural learning and development, whereas Piaget focused more on the individual. It is not that Piaget ignored the environmental or contextual variables in development and learning so much that he stressed individual or autonomous reactions to environmental and situational variables. Vygotsky stressed the importance of culture and context to a far greater degree.

Similarities Between Piaget and Vygotsky

Both Piaget and Vygotsky are essentially constructivists, believing that development consists of successively assimilating or accommodating during developmental processes and stages (Van Geert, 1998). Therefore, there are ontologies and epistemologies shared in common by Vygotsky and Piaget. The similarities between Vygotsky and Piaget also extend into their respective beliefs on the universal origins and characteristics of human development: namely that all persons will progress according to similar stages due to genetic or ingrained biological factors. Lourenço (2012) posits seven main points of convergence between Piaget and Vygotsky, including the genetic, developmental perspective, the dialectical...

282). Piaget and Vygotsky are both essentially phenomenologists, interested in lived experiences during the processes of learning and development.
Differences Between Piaget and Vygotsky

The primary difference between the two theorists is that Piaget remained far more focused on the individual and the endogenous factors in development, whereas Vygotsky was more concerned with the social and the exogenous (Marti, 2013). According to Lourenço (2012), the philosophical underpinnings of Piaget’s individualist theory include a belief in immanent versus transcendent deity: divinity is immediately accessible to a person and does not need to be mediated through any social organization like organized religion. Vygotsky, on the other hand, favored a learning environment or teaching style that was more authoritarian, based perhaps on a transcendent view of deity (Lourenço, 2012). Piaget dismissed rigidity and dogma, favoring individual curiosity and discovery of knowledge. Vygotsky preferred an approach based on the social or collective accumulation of knowledge that would be passed down through hierarchical systems. Essentially, the differences between Piaget and Vygotsky parallel the differences between an individualistic and a collectivistic society. Lourenço (2012) conceives of the differences as being between autonomy and heteronomy.

For Piaget, external influences are important but only to an extent. The individual’s own core competencies still determine capacities for specific types of learning and cognitive development. Piaget believed that individuals must construct their own meaning, which can then motivate the person to learn even if by rote. Thus, Piaget fostered what is known as psychogenesis: whereby the individual initiates the cognitive processes most important and implicated in constructivist…

Sources used in this document:

References

Lourenço, O. (2012). Piaget and Vygotsky: Many resemblances, and a crucial difference . Nwew Ideas in Psychology 30(2012): 281-295.

Marti, E. (2013). Mechanisms of internalisation and externalisation of knowledge in Piaget's and Vygotsky's theories. In Tryphon, A. (Ed.) Piaget Vygotsky: The Social Genesis of Thought. London: Psychology Press.

van Geert, P. (1998). A dynamic systems model of basic developmental mechanisms: Piaget, Vygotsky, and beyond. Psychological Review, 105(4), 634-677.


Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Learning: Concepts and Theories What Makes Us
Words: 982 Length: 3 Document Type: Term Paper

Learning: Concepts and Theories What makes us human? Many would say it is our opposing thumb, but others would posit the fact that we are intelligent thinkers. Our ability to learn from the world around us is what separates us from many of the other creatures in the animal kingdom. We can learn from our experiences in order to create a better world for ourselves. Yet, the concept of how we

Constructivist Computerized Learning Constructivist Theories of Knowledge...
Words: 2203 Length: 6 Document Type: Essay

Constructivist Computerized Learning Constructivist theories of knowledge development and learning have been around since the turn of the 20th century. But it may well be the advent of computerized and e-learning educational opportunities that offer this perspective its real chance to make a difference in the virtual world of learning and instruction. From Piaget to Papert, the core precepts of the constructivist understanding have been affirmed by what technology has to

Learning Theories Abstract, Learned Phenomena
Words: 6278 Length: 20 Document Type: Research Proposal

Apa.org). Critical thinking input: Good teachers that truly understand how distracted today's young people are (with technology, etc.) learn how to get the most out of students by combining proven strategies of engagement with scholarship challenges that are both entertaining and compelling to their active minds. B.F. Skinner Historical views of transfer. When something is said to you and it reminds you (without you having to conjure up memories) instantly of something from

Vygotsky and Piaget Lev Vygotsky
Words: 1066 Length: 3 Document Type: Term Paper

Both Piaget and Vygotsky approached the role of artifacts on the development of mind. Piaget believed action is used by the child in order to understand and construct their knowledge base. "To understand is to invent." In contrast, Vygotsky believed that understanding comes only through social interaction. Role of Culture Vygotsky believed that cultural artifacts pla a major role in illiciting an account of where the mind is. The ZPD reflects

Piaget Cognitive Development
Words: 883 Length: 3 Document Type: Research Paper

Piaget Harry James Potter was born in 1980, the son of James and Lily Potter. Both of Harry's parents died when Harry was an infant. The murder of his parents literally left Harry Potter scarred for life: his lightening bolt-shaped scar is one of his most distinguishing physical features. The orphaned Harry was forced to live with distant family relatives who are Muggles, and culturally distinct from Harry. Harry Potter studies

Vygotsky Freud's Theories of Development Have Been
Words: 701 Length: 2 Document Type: Essay

Vygotsky Freud's theories of development have been profoundly influential upon literature and popular culture. Freud's theory of the Oedipal and Electra complexes suggests that all children form a sexual connection with their mother as their first, primary emotional impulse. Gradually, culture comes to channel children's emotions into more appropriate ways, so that after the repressive phase of childhood, adolescents form sexual attachments to people outside the family. Freud's influence upon educational

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now