Fundamental Human Rights and Voting Rights for the Incarcerated
One of the fundamental human rights according to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) is that of access to the vote. Arguably, the right to have self-determination is critical, and without such a right, equality of treatment is impossible to realize. Politicians will have no incentive to pass laws to protect the rights of groups whose opinion they are not beholden to for reelection. According to the ICCPR, the right to vote should be bestowed “without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status” (Dhami, 2005, p. 236). Other fundamental human rights, such as the right to pursue a livelihood of one’s choice, to live free and unmolested to express one’s political opinions, to practice one’s religion, and to be safe and secure in one’s person extends from that right to political representation based in democratic ideals.
Unfortunately, despite the fundamental nature of such a right, even many nations which are ostensibly democratic in their focus have passed restrictions upon the right to vote. One of the most common is banning individuals in prison from voting, as is the case in the United Kingdom, and in Australia for any prisoner serving a sentence longer than 5 years (Dhami, 2005). In the United States, because of its federalist system, laws often vary between states. But even when individuals in prison are eligible to vote, they may not be aware of this fact. Voters may lack basic civic literacy to learn “they are eligible to vote, and others may ask for voter registration or absentee ballot request forms, only to be refused by local sheriffs or county clerks” (Paikowsky, 2019, p.833).
Of course, some people might protest that individuals who are jailed should not have a right to vote because they have transgressed the laws of society. But this is a problematic statement in a number of respects. First and foremost, in many nations such as China officials incarcerate individuals for political reasons such as demanding the right to exercise free speech. Secondly, not all prisoners have committed severe transgressions. Finally, the composition of the prison population is such that voter disenfranchisement can have a significant impact upon not simply the immediate electoral results, but the societal changes those results will have. The incarcerated population is more apt to be indigent, due to the inability to secure bail and adequate legal representation, and the types of crimes which indigent populations commit are more apt to result in incarceration or refusal of bail (Paikowsky, 2019). Likewise, incarcerated populations are more apt to be Black, native, and Latino versus the general population as well as homeless or disabled (Paikowsky,...…as poll taxes and literacy tests. Felon disenfranchisement was “narrower in scope than literacy tests or poll taxes and easier to justify than understanding of grandfather clauses” (Arp & Morton, 2005, p. 632). African Americans were incarcerated for minor offenses which would be difficult to defend against, particularly within the legal system which was effectively rigged against them.
Today, it is often argued that mandatory sentencing laws and incarcerating individuals for minor drug offenses often have a similarly chilling effect upon minority communities. This questions the notion that crime can simply be viewed as an individual failing. First, the social conditions which gave rise to the crime and may cause certain crimes to be viewed and punished more harshly must be analyzed. Secondly, the social effects upon the community of punishment (disenfranchisement of members of historically discriminated-against minorities) must be analyzed when passing policy.
Strategies to Limit Structural Barriers
Above all, disseminating information is critical. First, there should be advocates stationed within prisons specifically tasked with informing inmates of their rights, including the right to vote. Secondly, mandatory sentencing laws, possession offenses, even status offenses for juveniles and other laws which more frequently result in the punishment of minority groups should be reviewed for the disproportionate impact upon specific populations and society. Finally, the toll that disenfranchising prisoners has had upon national representation should be calculated on a regular basis.
References
Arp, W. & Morton,…
References
Arp, W. & Morton, B. (2005). A political history and analysis of disenfranchisement and restoration of the black vote in Louisiana. The Western Journal of Black Studies, 29(3): 629-638.
Dhami, M. (2005). Prisoner disenfranchisement policy: A threat to democracy? Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 5 (1): 235—247.
Paikowsky, D. (2019), Jails as polling places: Living up to the obligation to enfranchise the voters we jail. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 54 (2): 829-873.
Zhang, E. (2019). New tricks for an old dog: Deterring the vote through confusion in felon disenfranchisement, Missouri Law Review, 84: 1037-1053.
One hypothesis is that many African-Americans yielded to the intimidation of the time and simply did not want to risk their safety and the safety of their families. 6. Poll Taxes A poll tax is a tax of a fixed amount charged each person to register to vote. (Webster's New World Law Dictionary.) as discussed previously, poll taxes were outlawed by the Twenty First Amendment. The practical effect of poll taxes
The milestone that the Civil Rights Movement made as concerns the property ownership is encapsulated in the Civil Rights Act of 1968 which is also more commonly referred to as the Fair Housing Act, or as CRA '68. This was as a follow-up or reaffirmation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, discussed above. It is apparent that the Civil Rights Act of 1866 outlawed discrimination in property and housing there
In fact, while Great Britain is liberal in many areas, prison rights does not seem to be one of them. Prisoners commonly appeal conditions to the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), which has a much more liberal stance on human and inmate rights than those of Great Britain. For example, "On its 2005 visit to UK prisons, the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture (CPT), was highly
Inmates and God Time/Right to Vote/Mandatory Release Not all inmates are banned from voting if the state laws are not regulated accordingly. However, in the U.S. merely two states allow felons to vote from prison. Furthermore, in certain extreme cases, depending on the crime committed and other variables, the right to vote can remain rescinded even after felons have been released from prison and are paying debts. In most situations,
Because of the fact that they are Negros, they have been oppressed and intimidated on several occasions. Malcolm X also makes some historical claims when demanding the civil rights. He states that Negro revolt has been going on since 1945 in the whole world and in 1964 will see that it then emerges to be a black revolution. He claims that this revolution has been happening in Asia, Africa
When his voice is removed, the laws he is held subject to lose all rationality, especially in a democracy. E.B. White, in response to the Nuremberg trials, said something akin to "If a man hangs, it does not spell justice unless he helped write the law that hanged him" (paraphrase mine). This was as true of these trails of Nazi war criminals as it is of our citizen felons.
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now