Colonialism and Empire in International Law
Introduction
Colonialism has been inscribed in international law in spite of attempts by the League of Nations and the United Nations to limit the right of states to exert force on other sovereign states. As Bowden notes, in spite of many Western colonial possessions seeking the newly recognized right to national self-determination, unexempted state sovereignty, unqualified inclusion in international society, and full recognition under international law there has been little movement away from colonialism in the 20th and 21st centuries.[footnoteRef:2] Wilson condemned colonialism and championed self-determination via the League of Nations and the Mandate System.[footnoteRef:3] Wilson went so far as to declare the US a trustee of the Filipino peoplehowever, this idea of trusteeship flies in the face of self-determination; it allowed powerful states like the US to maintain colonies while paying lip service to anti-colonial ideals.[footnoteRef:4] International law was used, in short, to facilitate colonialism even at the same time colonial powers projected an attitude of embracing the right to self-determination of the people. [2: Bowden B., The Empire of Civilisation: The Evolution of an Imperial Idea (2009) 126.] [3: A. Anghie,Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law(CUP, 2004) 140.] [4: Anghie [n2] 140.]
The Mandate System
Colonial territories have always represented significant economic importance for colonial powers.[footnoteRef:5] At the end of the 19th century, for instance, the US battled Spain for control of the Philippinesnot out of any altruistic desire to liberate the Filipino people but rather out of a desire to expand the American Empire. The US had always been motivated by a spirit of Manifest Destiny, which was used to justify its westward push across the American continent and then, having reached to the Pacific, was used to send the Empires rein further west into Asia. The westward expansion of the US is part of its colonial history in America. Its treatment of the Native American tribes shows its view of indigenous peoples and the extent of their rights in the face of empire. The US was begun essentially as a business by the English and profits were always the main motive of expansion. As Anghie notes, This preoccupation with profit contrasted somewhat with the noble visions of Empire that others put forward to justify empire building later in the 20th century.[footnoteRef:6] The idealistic words of Wilson with his 14 points centered around this single idea: adjust colonial claimsa point that brought context to everything else.[footnoteRef:7] Even from the perspective of the time it was clear that the colonial nations were operating more out of commercial self-interest than out of any altruistic belief. Colonies provided raw materials for empires and they were of vital importance for any state seeking to be a global power. WW1 and WW2 brought this importance into sharp focus, and it remained in sharp focus throughout the Cold Warand so it remains today even with the Russia-West conflict in Ukraine. [5: Anghie [n2] 141.] [6: Anghie [n2] 141.] [7: President Woodrow Wilson's Fourteen Points 8 January 1918.]
The Mandate System that developed in the 20th century was meant to turn states into wards of colonial powers. Indeed, international law has been little more than a set of rules written, implemented, and interpreted by colonial powers. Thus, Anghie writes that the positivist international law of conquest, which the League jurists sought to displace, had been directed toward extinguishing and invalidating the legal systems of non-European peoples and endorsing their replacement with the systems of law established by the colonizers.[footnoteRef:8] Through the establishment of international tribunals, Western states masked their true colonial intentions behind a well-meaning front: in this way, the universalizing...
…is not the course of international law that aids small states but rather the fact that the rival Powers will support them against another Power in order to prevent a rival from gaining too much dominance. One sees this plainly enough in the stance that China has taken in supporting Russia against Western sanctions over the Ukraine situation. [29: Colby [n26] 281.] [30: Carty A., The Decay of International Law (1986) 5.] [31: Anand R., Attitude of the Afro-Asian States Towards Certain Problems of International Law, 15 ICLQ (1966) 35.]Conclusion
Colonialism has been inscribed into international law; international law in the 20th century was an attempt to hide colonialism beneath a veneer of liberal progressivism. The Mandate System was implemented to replace classical positivist international law, as it justified colonial powers maintaining their hold over smaller states and the resources therein. The only reason the Mandate System was given up on was that indigenous peoples pushed back and caused more trouble for the colonizing state than was necessarily worth the cost. This did not stop colonial powers from continuing to push for empire expansion, however. When the law fails to provide the powers with a path toward what they want, they resort to war. Two world wars were fought in the 20th century because international law failed to win the colonial powers the control they sought to maintain. International law and war are extensions of politics. If international forums like the UN today have given smaller, less powerful states a stage upon which they can be heard, it is simply a convenient way for rival powers to block the geopolitical ambitions of one another. When these forums get in the way of said ambitions, war breaks outfor international forums like international law are merely tools of empire: they are not constraints.
Bibliography
Anand R.,…
Bibliography
Anand R., ‘Attitude of the Afro-Asian States Towards Certain Problems of InternationalLaw’, 15 ICLQ (1966) 35.
Anaya J., Indigenous Peoples in International Law (1996).
Anghie, A., Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law (CUP, 2004).
Bowden B., The Empire of Civilisation: The Evolution of an Imperial Idea (2009).
Carty A., The Decay of International Law (1986).
Colby E, 'How to Fight Savage Tribes', 21 AJIL (1927) 279.
Crawford, J., The Creation of States in International law (2nd edition, 2006).
Getachew A., Worldmaking after Empire: the Rise and Fall of Self-Determination(2019).
Megret, F., 'From Savage to Unlawful Combatants: A Post-colonial Look at InternationalHumanitarian Law's Other' in Orford, A,International Law and Its Others (Cambridge University Press: 2006) 298.
President Woodrow Wilson's Fourteen Points 8 January 1918.
Wright, Q., ' The Bombing of Damascus' 20 AJIL (1926) 263-280
S. Congress 2006). Under a military commission's procedures and rules of evidence, the accused may present evidence, cross examine witnesses against him, and respond to evidence presented against him; attend all the sessions of the trial; and have the rights to counsel and self-representation. The bill does not grant him the right to see all the evidence against him to establish his guilt or innocence. It authorizes the Secretary to
It has given a clear signal to unscrupulous tyrants and murderous dictators around the world that they have no place to hide. Earlier, they could escape prosecution for their crimes by brow-beating or manipulating the judicial system in their own country; the expanding reach of international law has now made it possible for them to be answerable for such universally unacceptable crimes (Kenneth Roth). The benefits of international law are
S. policymakers about the international consensus on questions and issues. The U.S. thus uses international law in its foreign policy and also contributes to its formation and development. This is why it formally recognizes and respects fundamental rules and principles as guide to its foreign policy (Joyner). However, American foreign policy has not focused very much on international law (Rivkin and Casey 2000). Since the end of the Cold War, many
International Law Efficiency of the international laws There has been a growing concern over the international law and the application of the same bearing the different settings and backgrounds against which these laws are applied. As they are international laws, so they are taken to be universal with the difference in the reality one the ground differing from one country to another, one continent to another, being of little or no significance
The case involving Milosevic was has different sub-plots, as he would claim that the actions he took were to prevent the country from being overrun by terrorists. Yet, at the same time, as some of these atrocities were being committed, NATO would attack Serbia in an effort to halt these violations. In this aspect, one could argue that the actions taken by NATO were in violation of international law. As
International Law The objective of this work in writing is to examine what it means to 'keep the peace' in the present age and the world facing challenges and threats of unprecedented scope, scale and complexity. The question addressed in this research is that which asks where in such endeavors are the existence of international institutions and legal doctrines likely to suffice and where are international institutions and legal doctrines likely
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now