Verified Document

Utilitarianism: A Closer Look Utilitarianism Is An Term Paper

Utilitarianism: A Closer Look Utilitarianism is an old political theory. It has been put forth in one form or another by many political philosophers over the years as the basis for a good political system. Epicurus was one of the early proponents of utilitarianism, though he did not call it by that name. However, he did promote the idea that happiness or pleasure was a good indicator of moral decisions. Jeremy Bentham, John Stuart Mill, and Henry Sigwick, all well-known political philosophers, also put forth utilitarian ideas in their political philosophies. While a utilitarian political philosophy may have some uses in making decisions that affect a large number of people, such as the decision to go to war or the decision to raise taxes to pay for health care, utilitarianism does not take into consideration the distinctions between people. There is no room for individual thought or action in utilitarianism, as each person's actions must be taken in context with the amount of pleasure or pain those actions will bring to others. This paper argues that utilitarianism is not useful as an individual philosophy, as it does not take the differences between individuals into consideration.

The political philosophy of utilitarianism is highly impersonal in nature. It focuses on what is good for humans as a whole, rather than what is good for one human. As people are different from each other by nature, each with different interests, likes, dislikes, and beliefs, the philosophy of utilitarianism can not be effectively used where individuals are concerned. A government operating under a utilitarian philosophy would be required to take into consideration the relative pain or pleasure that...

Not only that, but every possible effect any decision made could have on every single person in the country would also have to be taken into consideration before a decision could be made. Even if it were possible for a government to somehow determine whether its decisions would bring pleasure or pain to each and every one of its citizens, it would be practically impossible for the government to determine every possible effect the decision about to be made could have on every citizen. The very nature of utilitarianism then -- focusing on the whole rather than on the individual -- makes it impractical as a political philosophy.
While it may seem from this that utilitarianism does take individual differences into consideration -- it does, after all, look at how each person will be affected by a potential decision -- a closer look at utilitarianism will reveal that this is not the case. Almost all of the political philosophers who have been proponents of utilitarianism have advanced the idea that what brings pleasure to the greatest number of people is the best moral course of action to take. However, the reality is that any decision to be made could have a variety of effects on a person, ranging from pleasure to pain to indifference. A person may even feel both pleasure and pain about a decision, such as if the decision brought pain to someone that person was personally close to. In fact, any potential decision that a government could make has the potential to have many varied and subtle effects on every person it touches. By simply grouping the effects a decision can have on a person into either "pleasure" or…

Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Looking Into Teleworking the Employee Impact Within the Organization...
Words: 2268 Length: 7 Document Type: Research Paper

Teleworking: The Employee Impact Within the Organization Telework (or telecommuting as it is normally referred to), has been around for quite some time now. More so, this is a work option that is bound to grow and increase in the future. Teleworking is known as a specified work option that provides an employee the ability to work and undertake tasks away from a central office base, for instance from a home

Smoking in the Workplace the
Words: 1359 Length: 4 Document Type: Essay

The New York case though does not come near this because clearly the means initiated by the government are just and proper. The end or overall utility is not only to prevent non-smokers from the ill effects of second hand smoke but lessen the smoking of smokers. Overall, the end result sees a healthier population and between the rights of the smokers and their health and well-being, the goodness

Corporate Governamce and the Fall of Enron Ethical Analysis
Words: 1634 Length: 5 Document Type: Case Study

Utility Ethics: Enron Utility Ethics at Enron Why utility ethics is a valid way of deciding right and wrong Utility ethics are considered to be universal, growth-driven, and offer service to the organization with the only consideration of the right and the wrong. Utility ethics is a valid way of deciding the right and wrong because growth does not always mean that it is right. The same perspective does not apply to failing:

Ethics: Green's Dilemma Identifying Logical Fallacies Fallacy
Words: 1086 Length: 4 Document Type: Term Paper

Ethics: Green's Dilemma Identifying Logical Fallacies Fallacy 1: Circular Definition (The definition includes the term being defined as a part of the definition, it is assumed because something is a rule it must be obeyed without saying why) "I believe that all rules should be strictly obeyed," the officer told himself. Fallacy 2: Conflicting Conditions (The definition is self-contradictory) "But this is a special circumstance. Don't all rules have exceptions? Fallacy 3: Argument from emotion.

Torture Why Our Nation Cannot
Words: 1183 Length: 4 Document Type: Essay

These logistical problems are only one source of error in Levin's argument, however. The idea of establishing guilt with certainty before using torture fits the utilitarian ethic; it ensures that any reduction in happiness or good to the terrorist is more than compensated for by the increased happiness in the terrorist's would-be victims. The other part of Levin's argument, that torture should only be used as a preventative and not

Ethics of Legalizing Marijuana in Recent Years,
Words: 2473 Length: 8 Document Type: Essay

Ethics of Legalizing Marijuana In recent years, there has been a significant amount of debate as to whether or not the possession and usage of marijuana should be legalized. Several issues revolve around this topic, not the least of which are the perceived and actual effects of this particular narcotic in a psychological, physical, economic, and even social sense. Perhaps one of the best methods for determining a prudent choice of

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now