The "don't ask, don't tell" policy has been rendered impotent if not downright illegal by various Supreme Court rulings, and yet the military's stance on the subject remains ambiguous. Before the institution of the "don't ask, don't tell" policy, under which individuals were not to be asked about their homosexual desires or activities nor to discuss them with anyone, the number of people who had been discharged from the military for engaging in homosexual acts -- which is still grounds for a discharge -- had been steadily decreasing. After the policy was officially implemented, discharges for homosexuality became more regular, and were on the increase until just recently (Burelli & Feder 2009). Though the Supreme Court has rendered discrimination based on sexual orientation a violation of basic civil rights, such discrimination continues.
The various branches of the United States military claim that there are special issues at work in the military that make the issue more complicated and necessitate keeping homosexuals away from heterosexual servicemen and women. These are the same basic arguments that were used to perpetuate the segregation of African-Americans in the armed forces, and that are still often invoked in order to bar women from certain types of service (Ernst & Gilbeau 1993). These other minority groups, however, have already been fully enfranchised in society at large, and enjoy the rights of marriage and family without a second thought. Homosexuals are not truly allowed to be open or free in public even as civilians, and this has made the struggle within the military much harder. The rest of the nation appears poised to slowly move towards granting full citizenship to homosexuals, yet the military lags behind.
This, as we have seen, is all to true to form. The military leadership is still composed largely -- almost entirely -- of white presumably heterosexual (we're not allowed to find...
Weapons of mass destruction are just an excuse. But is known that "President George W Bush and Vice-President Dick Cheney were both oil company executives before entering politics, as was half the present US administration," which means that not only do you have friends in the oil business but that they dictate your policy (Vesely 2002). Having such deceptive and underhanded policies and engaging an entire nation in a war that not only kills Amerians,
This is significant, because it would give the U.S. A way of being able to maintain this kind of balance of power in the region. As the trade embargos / economic sanctions against Iran and Iraq would serve as an example of inappropriate behavior. This is because they were being punished, for different activities that were in violation of international law such as: the support of terrorism or the
" (Lindsey, 2004, p.1) it is interesting to note that one of the young protestors stated: "[the world leaders] are sitting over there on Sea Island having their little party only talking about how to fix things, but we are over here actually doing something to make things better" -- Laurel Paget-Seekins (Lindsey, 2004, p. 1) the U.S.A. Patriot Act has been touted to do just this - or to
Against InclusionThe inclusion of cultural and human geographic concepts in military and intelligence operations might seem potentially advantageous operationally, but it presents substantial ethical dilemmas and risks misusing sensitive cultural information, compromising research objectivity, and fostering mistrust due to perceived ulterior motives. This is why we are against it.Historical Misuse of Social SciencesOne of the primary concerns is the historical misuse of the social sciences in conflict zones. The integration
First of all only a scant few of these Veterans groups will acknowledge the "promise" of free health care; for the most part these groups will tout the benefits already promised by the Veterans Administration and assert that cuts in these benefits are the same a broken promise-or contractual breach in legal terms. The idea of the United States military making a "promise" or forging a legally binding agreement between
Without taking into account these factors, strategic planning will not measure up to the requirements of planning adequately for the future. The author also notes that the complexity of strategic planning is increased by the flexibility of the all the factors involved. Thorough analysis is therefore required to construct a viable strategy that takes into account as many factors as possible. As an example, Habegger (2009: 3) mentions the United
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now