Verified Document

U.S Foreign Policy The Issue Term Paper

However, the prerogatives of the presidential office give him this possibility. In this sense, his quality as commander in chef of the armed forces enables him to wage war without the approval of the Congress. Also, the first war in Iraq represented a good precedent for the authority of the President to go to war. Finally, another element that were used as justification for the intervention in Iraq without congressional approval is the Congress's resolution discussing the intervention against terrorism. In this sense, "the President is authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons, in order to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States by such nations, organizations or persons" (Authorizing Use of Force 09-14-01, 2001). Therefore, these can be considered as having been the arguments invoked for the President to go to war in Iraq without the approval of the Congress. The public opinion is an important factor in the United States for the political power it holds. In this sense, the power of the individual vote is essential for the politicians. However, at the time of the U.S. intervention in Iraq, the polls supported this action and offered the legitimacy to wage war, despite the fact that democratically speaking, it was a breach of the Constitution. On the other hand, the Congress can also limit the powers of the president by a joint resolution against the actions undergone by the president. However, this disequilibrium rarely occurs. This is why the Congress encounters some of the most interesting debates in politics.

The United Nations, as part of the international system has a limited means of preventing military actions against another state. All the states...

In this sense, they also benefit from an intrinsic attribute of sovereignty, the right to self-defense; this right offers them the possibility to defend themselves from a violent attack without breaching the international law. Therefore, the United States appealed to the right to collective self-defense against terrorism when invading Iraq. However, despite the fact that the United States did not receive the agreement of the United Nations, the UN was not able to prevent the U.S. led intervention.
Overall, it can be said that the United States has largely benefited from the democratic infrastructure its Constitution created. However, the presidential powers became more and more extended and limited the powers of the Congress and created a sense of disequilibrium between the presidential and the congressional institutions. Also, inside the American society, it is rather hard to ascertain the degree in which the public opinion and the legislative body can actually influence the decision of the president. Finally, the United Nations, despite the fact that it is a global player on the international scene, is limited in its possibilities to prevent war and foreign interventions.

Bibliography

Authorizing Use of Force 09-14-01. U.S. Government info. 2001. 25 February 2008. http://usgovinfo.about.com/library/bills/blsjres23.htm

Ehrhart, W.D. "The Authority to Declare War." Intervention Magazine. 2003. 25 February 2008. http://www.interventionmag.com/cms/index.php?name=News&file=article&sid=335

Lithwick, Dahlia. "What War Powers Does the President Have?" Slate. 2001. 25 February 2008. http://www.slate.com/id/1008290

War Power Resolution. Findlaw.com 2008. 25 February 2008 http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/casecode/uscodes/50/chapters/33/sections/section_1541.html

Sources used in this document:
Bibliography

Authorizing Use of Force 09-14-01. U.S. Government info. 2001. 25 February 2008. http://usgovinfo.about.com/library/bills/blsjres23.htm

Ehrhart, W.D. "The Authority to Declare War." Intervention Magazine. 2003. 25 February 2008. http://www.interventionmag.com/cms/index.php?name=News&file=article&sid=335

Lithwick, Dahlia. "What War Powers Does the President Have?" Slate. 2001. 25 February 2008. http://www.slate.com/id/1008290

War Power Resolution. Findlaw.com 2008. 25 February 2008 http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/casecode/uscodes/50/chapters/33/sections/section_1541.html
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

U.S. Foreign Policy -- Middle
Words: 1158 Length: 3 Document Type: Essay

S.; b) assess correctly the readiness of America's partners to back up the sanctions; and c) engender the support of minor trading partners ("black knights") to increase their willingness to trade with Iran as the big players leave in obedience to the U.S. led sanctions (Kozhanov, 145). The Russian writer uses some of the space in his article to review the history of U.S. sanctions against Iran, and mentions a brief

U.S. Foreign Policy in the
Words: 3807 Length: 10 Document Type: Term Paper

Weapons of mass destruction are just an excuse. But is known that "President George W Bush and Vice-President Dick Cheney were both oil company executives before entering politics, as was half the present US administration," which means that not only do you have friends in the oil business but that they dictate your policy (Vesely 2002). Having such deceptive and underhanded policies and engaging an entire nation in a war that not only kills Amerians,

U.S. Foreign Policy US Middle
Words: 2218 Length: 8 Document Type: Thesis

The international community can obviously respond by seeking to marginalize the Taliban and similar movements as extremists. However, it has become clear following the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon that western governments have not been effective in infiltrating terrorist networks and pre-empting attacks. It has also become clear that there will be no shortage of people in the Islamic world who are willing to

U.S. Foreign Policy Towards North
Words: 2229 Length: 6 Document Type: Research Proposal

(Efimova, 2007, paraphrased) SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION North Korea underwent internal changes as well as changes due to external factors that placed North Korea in a defensive stance in its focus on strategically avoiding threats and in rebuilding its own self-reliance economically. For North Korea since the Berlin Wall fell the use of conventional weapons by North Korea in defending itself from external foes has not been a feasible proposition, therefore, it

U.S. Foreign Policy and the
Words: 3110 Length: 9 Document Type: Term Paper

They however fail to see the strategic linkage in the U.S. foreign policy. Israel is the most trusted ally of United States in the region. It has the same strategic interest as the United States and has a firm foundation of democratic support. The Arab governments on the other hand are unpopular, non-democratic and are in power due to the western interest in maintaining the status quo. Overthrow of the

U.S. Foreign Policy Authors Lafeber,
Words: 1065 Length: 3 Document Type: Term Paper

Similar ambitions of Mao and Stalin to establish pro-communist Korean state, which was divided into two spheres of influences Soviet, with communist regime of Kim Il Sung and pro-American nationalist authoritarian regime of Syngman Rhee. But according to authors Offner and Gaddis we can say that the role played by North Korean authorities was the main in this conflict. The war started North Korean in 1950 was over three

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now