Verified Document

U.S. And European Jury Systems Term Paper

Reform from within the EU does not seem possible, either. It is so structured as to prevent changes in member states' minority status and other modifications from becoming attainable. Attempts by any government to amend the Community laws are considered doomed to failure, because Parliament has almost no part in European law-making (Andrews).

Conclusion

Common and civil law systems are inherently opposed, although their shared goal is to conduct a just, speedy and most inexpensive settling of conflicts (Messitte 1999). American courts have increasingly acknowledged the need to continuously evaluate and modify their processes and altogether improve the quality of justice. Efforts cover many other aspects of court activity, ranging from dispute resolution mechanisms, such as arbitration and mediation, to procedures, such as default and summary judgment used I the early stage of a trial without needing to proceed to a formal trial (Messitte).

Jury trial has disappeared in the English civil law since the Common Law Procedure Act of 1854 when communications improved with railroads and the telegraph. Now, the right to a jury trial is reserved for serious offenses, such as rape, assault and murder, and which explains why people in California pay $53 a year to support their court system as compared to only $23 paid by the British. This is only in addition to extended litigation costs (Adams).

Blue Ribbon Commission investigation conducted in 1996 reported on improvements on the jury system of California (Adams 2003), which...

One would reduce the number of jurors in civil trials, which would likewise reduce peremptory challenges and raise the pay to more than the current $5 a day.
It can make more sense to give the judge the lead role in examining witnesses and greater power in the evidentiary process so as to considerably decrease lawyers' effort and cost in exchange for increasing the judge's participation (Kotz 2003). This is one advantage European courts or civil law has over the American common law system. The latter can help the average individual by reforming current civil procedures by modifying the traditional system or by introducing and adopting alternative methods of resolving disputes as major steps to take (Kotz).

Bibliography

Adams, James, ed. The Jury Enigma. Court Management Observer, 2003. http://www.cmobs.com/editorial403.htm

Andrews, D. Freedom in Jeopardy. Freedom Central, 2004. http://www.freedom.central.net/euandbritain.html

Kotz, Hein. Civil Justice Systems in Europe and the United States. Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law, Special Issue, 2003. http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?13+Duke+j.+Comp+8+Int'l+L.061

Massitte, Peter J. Common Law vs. Civil Law Systems. United States Information Systems, 1999. http://usinfo.state.gov/journals/itdhr/0999/ijdc/messitte.htm

Nelson, Thomson. Introduction to Judicial Systems. Thomson Nelson Political Science Resource Center, 2004. http://polisci.nelson.com/introcourts.html

Sources used in this document:
Bibliography

Adams, James, ed. The Jury Enigma. Court Management Observer, 2003. http://www.cmobs.com/editorial403.htm

Andrews, D. Freedom in Jeopardy. Freedom Central, 2004. http://www.freedom.central.net/euandbritain.html

Kotz, Hein. Civil Justice Systems in Europe and the United States. Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law, Special Issue, 2003. http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?13+Duke+j.+Comp+8+Int'l+L.061

Massitte, Peter J. Common Law vs. Civil Law Systems. United States Information Systems, 1999. http://usinfo.state.gov/journals/itdhr/0999/ijdc/messitte.htm
Nelson, Thomson. Introduction to Judicial Systems. Thomson Nelson Political Science Resource Center, 2004. http://polisci.nelson.com/introcourts.html
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Jury System Is Ineffective Because
Words: 467 Length: 2 Document Type: Essay

The jury system in inefficient because it relies on compulsory civil service that most people wish to avoid. Since long deliberations add to the length of jury service, jurors serving compulsory terms have a natural incentive to reach a verdict as soon as possible, which often influences the decision of minority opinion holders to join the majority irrespective of their beliefs and wholly apart from the separate issue of social

Trial by Jury
Words: 1100 Length: 3 Document Type: Term Paper

Trial by Jury -- a right that must be upheld, in part One of the most controversial issues today in the area of criminal justice is that of the right of all defendants to a trial by jury of his or her peers. Often, as seen in the pairing of the essays of the noted defense attorney, media personality, and Harvard Legal scholar Alan Dershowitz against the words of Christie Davies,

Juvenile Justice System Do You
Words: 2287 Length: 5 Document Type: Term Paper

In principle, the United States should follow international treaties only if it is a signatory to that specific treaty. However, the Supreme Court of the United States cannot ignore international standards completely either. There are several reasons for this. The world is becoming more and more globalized. Large numbers of immigrants have flocked to the United States in the last several decades and likewise American military and the FBI increasingly

British Electoral System Reform Over
Words: 7210 Length: 20 Document Type: Term Paper

The Constitution is based on several key principals the most notable would include: separation of powers as well as checks and balances. Separation of powers is when there are clearly defined powers that are given to the various branches of: the government, the federal government and the states. Checks and balances is when one branch of the government will have the power to the check the authority of another

Dual Court System in the
Words: 4296 Length: 10 Document Type: Term Paper

S. COURT SYSTEM FUNCTIONS (http://usinfo.state.gov/journals/itdhr/0999/ijde/fine.htm)." The highest tier of this federal system is the United States Supreme Court. This court has nine Supreme Court Justices who are appointed for the term of their life unless they choose to step down. A majority is not needed to win a Supreme Court hearing request. If four of the nine think the case brought before them is worth hearing then the case will be

Plato's Apology and Socrates' Trial
Words: 3029 Length: 9 Document Type: Term Paper

To wit, in Socrates' day, there were no official government prosecutors (commonly referred to in modern America as "District Attorneys"); in effect, any citizen could bring an indictment against any other citizen, and call for a trial. And that's basically what happened to Socrates. Here in America, in 2006, notwithstanding what Vice President Cheney said, President George W. Bush stated, "I will never question the patriotism of somebody who disagrees

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now