Ursula Burns
In February of 2010, Ursula Burns became the chief executive of Xerox Corporation. Burns has successfully led the Xerox Corporation through difficult financial straits, by divesting much of the outmoded commodity-based business strategies towards a broader service-oriented one. Repositioning the company has enabled Xerox to weather the economic storms, poised for a bright future. A large part of the reason for the positive outlook for Xerox is the leadership style of Ursula Burns, and the corporate culture Burns subsequently creates.
Several leadership theories can provide a foundation for describing Burns' leadership styles and philosophies. Trait theory suggests that Burns's success as a leader is partly or fully rooted in her innate personality traits: her notable extraversion, toughness, and commitment to the Xerox company. Burns is known for being assertive, as well as creative in her approach towards managing the company and managing organizational change, too. The President of the United States teased Burns for her toughness, which is one of the reasons she got noticed at Xerox in the first place (McGirt, 2011). It was Burns's willingness to speak out and up at meetings, even before she was in any position of power that would have enabled her to make a formal change to the organization (Bryant, 2010). Burns became the executive assistant to two senior Xerox managers prior to her becoming Vice President, then President, and then finally as CEO. During her work as executive assistant, Burns's directness, honesty, and forthright character highlights some of the ways trait theory accounts for leadership styles and philosophy.
Burns's leadership styles are difficult to pigeonhole because the CEO believes in the need to "manage people in different ways" rather than stick to a formal protocol (Bryant, 2010, p. 1). However, Burns's track record reveals a clear visionary style...
False Memories Petition The problem of a witness recall of memory based on psychiatric intervention- the evidence of which is unreliable It is humbly submitted that oral evidence all over the world forms the primary form of evidence. What a person sees, hears and probably experiences are part of the testimony which can be rebutted by a cross examination. In the adversarial form of criminal law, evidence of this type must be
false memories. Research indicates that many subjects of abuse or other traumatic occurrences often develop false memories. They remember events either differently than they actually occurred, or they forget them entirely. One study by Doctors Roediger & McDermott in looked at undergraduates and how they processed memories. Deep and shallow encoding was used to help them remember lists of words. Some remembered the words correctly, while others remembered them
Psychology Memories are an important part of the human experience. They help us define who we are, based on our past experiences, the people we have met, the places we have been and the things that we have done. Yet, there is much that we take for granted about memories, and they are often misunderstood. Consider for example criminal trials, where testimony is given on the basis of what people remember
Repressed Memory At first glance, The Myth of Repressed Memory seems like it might be an offensive read that denigrates the experiences of millions of abuse and incest survivors. Yet according to Elizabeth Loftus and Katherine Ketcham, the phenomenon of repressed memory is largely a myth. The authors' motives for writing The Myth of Repressed Memory seem noble enough on the surface: to retain the credibility of their professions and prevent
Path analysis procedures demonstrated that the participants' verbalization of the critical lures during the encoding process predicted their own levels of false recall of words in the lists. In short, encoding could be manipulated (deliberately even) to "enhance" and to produce false memories in a regular pattern (Goodwin, Meissner, & Ericsson, 2001, p. 806) Method In our experiment results, the hypothesis results were easily verifiable and follow-on clearly from earlier results
Memory: How it Works and Recovering Lost Memories The concept of memory and what comprises memory is often controversial. Loftus (1998) cites an article reporting on the case of a woman whose family accepted a large settlement on the grounds that health care professionals planted false memories into her mind. The woman suggested that she had been persuaded to believe multiple misconceptions regarding her history via drug therapy and hypnosis. While
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now