Domestic Terrorism
Since the days of the Old West, domestic terrorism has dug its roots into the United States. From Timothy McVeigh, whose motivations for the Oklahoma City bombing ranged from his complaints over the governments' dealing with certain political situations to his anger over the violence he witnessed during his stint in the military, to eco-terrorists and animal-rights activists who use violence in order to win others to their cause, the scope of terrorism is the United States is both large and diverse. While FBI agents search large cities for Al Qaeda terrorists in the United States, small town police arrest protestors who threaten to set fire to abortion clinics and make threats to far left and right wing organizations. Because a great deal of domestic terrorism centers around political ideas and activism, targeting domestic terrorism has become a rather controversial subject. Some argue that the demonstrations that often turn violent are indeed acts of terrorism, while others suggest that calling these acts terrorism infringes on the rights guaranteed in the constitution.
One example of this controversy concerns the rightwing group the Minuteman Organization, a group that patrols the United States-Mexico border in order to prevent illegal immigration. In 2007, Arizona lawmakers attempted to pass a law that changed the definition of domestic terrorism that would turn the organization into a terrorist group. Proponents of the law suggested that the minutemen's activities were illegal and should be included under the law, while the opposition argued that the law targeted the group because of their political beliefs (Baggett 2007).
Conclusion
Since the 1800s, terrorism has had a rich history in the United States. From armed militias that reeked havoc during the days of the Old West to Timothy McVeigh's ruthless bombing in Oklahoma City to eco and animal-rights terrorism, terrorists have made their names known by the violence they have caused. Because terrorism has become such a potent issue in the United States since September 11th, however, the government and public now know much more about terrorists than they have in the past....
TERRORISM Terrorism: International and Domestic Threats to the USIntroductionThere is no doubt that crime and its various aspects keep evolving over time. It therefore follows that the relevance of adapting the methodologies and approaches used to combat crime cannot be overstated. Similarly, in seeking to counter terrorism, there is need to be aware of the emerging trends of terrorism.DiscussionThe decision by the Department of Homeland Security � DHS to designate
However the disclaimers of USA Patriot Act agree on the necessity of protecting the nation and the world against terrorism, they also emphasize on the need to further analyze and change the act so that it does protect the individual liberties of the U.S. citizens and respects the provisions in the American constitution. 5. Discussion The question that has been asked by many simple individuals relies in the true agenda of the
Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism is the extended terminology that refers to the U.S.A. Patriot Act which, following the events of 9/11 was passed by the Senate immediately and almost unanimously. When the Pentagon and the World Trade Center were attacked in 2001, concerns over national security and America's susceptibility to terrorist threats emerged more so as the country remained baffled
In this case, it may be seen that the Patriot Act does not protect all citizens. It can be used to violate basic human right. Use of National Security Letters. The use of National Security Letters where the government asks private agencies (media, banks, etc.) for private information and give a NSL, wherein said agency cannot divulge the fact that they had given the said information, has also been rampant.
The effect is that exclusion is not only applied to those who would hurt the government but also to those that would uphold the same. The Patriot Act provides facilitation of shared information as well as cooperation between agencies of the government in order for all the pieces of the puzzle to fit together. The Act moves aside the barriers that have Constitutionally speaking prevented the police, intelligence as well
The result is thousands of people denied the necessary refuge that they seek. Clintora condemns this as a "major policy gap (that) threatens not only human rights in individual countries but also jeopardizes international and regional stability and American regional influence and economic interests." Kreimer (2007) expounds upon the fact that few legislators had time to fully read the PATRIOT Act, when it was first proposed. Once enacted, there was
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now