Unequal Pairs in Genesis
The source of hostility experienced by humankind has a long record and an intricate web of linked causes and ascription of causes. The highly charged concerns that human beings experience in the contemporary world are as a result of something more central and at the heart of people. Abel and Cain were brothers, but brothers who felt humiliated and threatened by actions and attitudes of each other. They were brothers who sought for exceptional favor and blessings from the same Creator they worshipped in distinctive ways. However, God accepted the sacrifice presented by Abel and rejected that of Cain. The rejection of Cain's sacrifice and acceptance of Abel's sacrifice demonstrate the need for people to choose between salvation and eternal torment, righteousness and wickedness.
The story of Cain and Abel follows upon the tale of sin of humanity, and represents humanity's further estrangement from God. The anecdote of Cain and Abel is one of the earliest conflict stories in the Bible. Structurally, the story of Cain and Abel developed around series of conceptual and verbal contrasts. Such paired contrasts acts as a rhetorical device that reflects a deeper prototype intrinsic in the Christian dialogue. Biblical episodes are often framed as contrasts between figures such as Cain and Abel, Jacob and Esau, Mary and Martha. By pairing or sibling rivalry, the bible writers wanted individual Christian to choose between what is good or bad, or choose between eternal torment and salvation.
Cain was the elder son of Eve and Adam and he was the first child born of human being the Holy Scriptures. Cain was a farmer and he grew grains and vegetables while his brother, Abel, was a shepherd. Their parents, Eve and Adam, informed them regarding God's message that they should present a lamb of sacrifice to God as a sign of appreciation for all that God had done for them and as a sign of repentance of their sins. Abel wanted to present an exceptional sacrifice to God and he therefore, selected the best lamb from his herd and presented it to his Creator. It was very difficult for Abel to present his most desired and expensive possession, but he want to try as much as possible and fulfill the message of God. By choosing the best lamb from his herd, Cain thought that his brother was impractical for presenting the best lamb as a sacrifice to God. Cain did not sacrifice a lamb but instead he presented leftovers from his harvest of grains and fruits. He failed to sacrifice a blood sacrifice as requested by God, "But Abel brought fat portions from some of the firstborn of his flock. The Lord looked with favor on Abel and his offering, but on Cain and his offering, he did not look with favor. So Cain was very angry, and his face was downcast (Genesis 4: 4-5, NIV). After the presentation of the offerings, God accepted Abel's sacrifice and rejected the sacrifice presented to him by Cain. God indicated his approval for Abel sacrifice through sending fire that consumed Abel's sacrifice. Cain watched as Abel offering got burnt while his sacrifice of grain and fruits burnt a bit, but never caught fire.
God did not reject Cain's offering because it did not contain blood, but because he presented some and not the best of his harvest. Moreover, God rejected Cain's offering because he made it without considering the person receiving the offering. Cain did not show the required humility, reverence, obedience and special care while considering and presenting his offering. Instead, he offered it in a giddy and nonchalant manner indicating that since the one receiving the offering special then the sacrifice needed not be special. On the contrary, Abel's sacrifice was exceptional because he chose the fat lamb and the firstborn. He took his time to select the best lamb from his flock. While it is not easy to tell whether God rejected Cain's offering because it was not the best or inadequate, Cain did not offer his sacrifice out of faith and his sacrifice was not the best, "By faith Abel brought God a better offering than Cain did. By faith he was commended as righteous, when God spoke well of his offerings. And by faith Abel still speaks, even though he is dead (Hebrew 11: 4, NIV). Through faith, Abel trusted that God needed the sacrifice of a blameless life to approach and please Him. Acceptance of Abel's offering was an autonomous choice of God, but he considered the attitude and the manner in which the two brothers...
Creation Mythology A culture's belief about the beginning of the world is called a creation myth, story or tale. An explanation of the origin of the universe is known as a cosmogony. It is difficult to find any people throughout the world who do not have some explanation for the source of life. One of the most interesting aspects of creation mythology is the similarities that exist among descriptions, whether they
Electoral Politics As detailed quite eloquently in Chapter 15 of Haywood's text, having political power is not simply getting one's way in a crude and overt manner, like passing or pushing a bill through congress. Rather, power also involves the task of agenda-setting itself, putting an idea upon the national platform of discourse. The author additionally cites Bacharatz and Baratz as critical in defining not simply making yes or no the
Social and Political History How do the functionalist and conflict theories relate to the conceptualizations of government and sovereignty presented by Heywood? How much is enough government? What level of government do we need to get our collective business done? How much sovereignty is appropriate for the American government to have, particularly in view of terrorist threats in the post 9/11 environment? When does government and sovereignty interfere with the full
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now