¶ … ultra-nationalist ideologies were far more threatening on a worldwide scale than communism to the liberal belief in individual rights from 1920-1945," because it is unequivocally true. One of the principle means of corroborating this statement is to analyze the atrocities and events that led up to and included World War II, which took place during the aforementioned time frame. World War II was largely about the propagation offFascism, which is ultra-nationalism at its finest -- or at its worse for the millions of people who were slaughtered in the wake of this ideology prior to and during World War II. An examination of first hand sources from the Japanese invasion of China, Italy, and from communist Russia indicate that ultra-nationalism was far more restrictive in individual rights than communism -- for the simple fact that the latter belief circumscribed such rights while the former simply eradicated them. Japan's invasion of China during the so-called fall of Nanking was largely based upon nationalistic tendencies. The Japanese prioritized its own nation above China, and were seeking to appropriate its territory and resources -- including people, commerce, and property -- for its own gain. As such, the Japanese offered little if any individual rights for the Chinese during this invasion and occupation. Their wanton slaughter of Chinese people and their wholesale raping and extermination of Chinese women was so pervasive that other international...
An examination of the following quotation from the diary of the German leader of that safety zone, John Rabe, demonstrates that even this zone did little to stop the Japanese troops from doing whatever they wanted to the Chinese.During this period, Austria also continued industrial expansion, but at a slower pace than Germany. With growth came further instability. Investment and founding of new organizations exploded since 1867, with over 400 new corporations being founded (Pulzer 1964) from 1867 to 1872. This was the age of the Gruender, which meant "entrepreneur," but also came to be associated with financially shaky schemes which resulted in the bursting of a speculative
Catholic church and public policy have remarked that the members of American clergy in general, without even excepting those who do not admit religious liberty, are all in favour of civil freedom; but they do not support any particular political system. They keep aloof from parties, and from public affairs. In the United States religion exercises but little influence upon laws, and upon the details of public opinion; but it
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now