Another reason which would make the withdrawal of U.S. troops important would be from the perspective of the United States. At the moment the war cost more than many officials had expected. According to unofficial sources the financial cost rose to "$500 billion in spending, at a rate now of more $2 billion a week" (King, 2007). The initial price of the war in Iraq had been considered by the White House to be at around $60 billion, although officials from the Administration admitted at the time of the invasion in 2003 that there could be no absolute measure for the costs of the war (Bash, 2003).
Notwithstanding the inability of the Administration to foresee such costs, there are other additional elements which make the war in Iraq appear to be a lost cause and would demand a withdrawal of the troops. For instance, the high number of victims in the American camp has made the public opinion withdraw the support for the war. In this sense, according to certain voices, there are "more than 3,500 Americans (who) have died in Iraq (and) more than 25,000 have been wounded" (King, 2007). From this perspective it is important to consider the eventuality of the withdrawal of troops because the Bush Administration cannot afford to support even more casualties among the Americans. Should the death toll rise, the Vietnam syndrome can reappear in the American society, a possibility which may determine a completely reconsideration of both foreign policy and the governing party in Washington.
Yet another argument for withdrawing the troops from the Iraqi territory is the fact that they are seen at the moment as incapable of achieving the aims set at the start of the mission, that of creating a democratic state in Iraq. There is little evidence to show a successful military campaign of the Coalition. As a result of this perception, more and more countries have already withdrawn their troops. States including Poland, Denmark, and Bulgaria have stated their intention to bring back home their militaries. Even U.S.'s strongest ally, Great Britain, announced the pull out...
His treatment of civilian casualties is caustically glib, and his support of the war is spurious and irresponsible. His insensitivity is most apparent when he claims of the war, "the people who ought to have been most affected by it, the population of Iraq itself, seemed scarcely to give it their attention," (p. 4). Keegan takes enormous liberties to make such a ludicrous assertion and without any proof. The
The primary targets of the war are still at large, rendering all use of American and British weapon technology useless and in fact, more damaging to Iraqi civil society. Indeed, weapon technologies are only as effective as the people who manage and use them. The American military, despite its sophisticated weapons, failed to capture Al-Qaeda because their weapons were not used strategically -- that is, weapons only become effective when
6). At home, though, the media can often be co-opted by being made to feel that public opinion would be against it if it reported something other than the prevailing public sentiment. After't he 9-11 attacks, the public wanted the perpetrators and their leaders punished, so the war in Afghanistan had the support of the public. By extension, the idea of the war on terror also had support, though
"The United States engaged in a pattern of conduct beginning in or before 1989 intended to lead Iraq into provocations justifying U.S. military action against Iraq and permanent U.S. military domination of the Gulf. 2. President Bush from August 2, 1990, intended and acted to prevent any interference with his plan to destroy Iraq economically and militarily. 3. President Bush ordered the destruction of facilities essential to civilian life and economic productivity
Despite high security in Baghdad, house searches, and strret patroling by the troops, the city remains pagued with violence. The current situation makes the use of miltary force as remedy for the current situation a useless option. A joint operation by Iraqi and coalition forces by the name of Operation Forward Together was also launched but jihadi elements, sectarian forces and nationalist elements continue to paly havoc with the
Iraq War and Public Opinion and Voting Behavior The months leading up to the 2004 presidential election were filled with commentaries and speculations as to what issues most concerned voters. From a vast array of topics such as health care, employment, social security, taxes, abortion and gay rights, voters at the polls on November 2 proved that what they were most concerned about was safety, thus homeland security and the
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now