Over 1,500 Jewish centers and thousands of communities had been erased. Of the 9.8 million Jews that were living in areas of Europe that would later be annexed by the Nazis, over half were dead by the end of the war.[footnoteRef:25] for example, Germany, Poland, and Czechoslovakia lost 96%, 98%, and 96% of their Jewish populations, respectively. The indictment was in fact stating that Eichmann was both the architect and executioner for the elimination of the Jewish populations in much of Western Europe. [24: Ibid.] [25: Moshe Pearlman, the Capture and Trial of Adolf Eichmann, (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1963), 229.]
The first witnesses for the prosecution related their personal experiences during the period before the Final Solution was begun.[footnoteRef:26] "… it was a Thursday night, at eight o'clock -- a policeman came and ordered us to come to Region 11. "Take nothing with you,' he said, 'you will be back immediately. But take your passports."[footnoteRef:27] Thus began the journey of Shmuel Grynszpan and his family into Poland. After finding themselves shoved together with others who had been rudely ejected from their homes and lives, they were forced to sign letters of acceptance for deportation. After waiting for 24 hours, they were transported to a railway station. Along the way they witnessed streets filled with anti-Semites shouting at them and encouraging their deportation. The train took them to a location close to the border, where other trainloads were arriving. Approximately 12,000 Jews were then stripped of their valuables and force to walk two kilometers to the border. Along the way, the Germans whipped and beat them and the road became splattered with blood. Once across the border, they were herded to a town of 6,000 where they finally got something to eat. They had not eaten since they were taken from their homes Thursday night. [26: Ibid., 234-252.] [27: Ibid.]
Many of these witnesses had personally interacted with Eichmann during the war period.[footnoteRef:28] in contrast to the mild and accommodating manner of the man sitting in the courtroom, they uniformly experienced Eichmann as arrogant, authoritarian, short-tempered, and abusive. While these witnesses helped to strip away Eichmann's attempts to appear as an 'everyman', merely having these character traits was insufficient to hang Eichmann for war crimes. Attorney General Hausner then began introducing depositions and documents that represented the greatest threat to Eichmann's defense team.[footnoteRef:29] These documents had been culled from the voluminous documentation of what had occurred under the leadership of Eichmann. These documents detailed the fact that Eichmann had been responsible for orchestrating the murder of over six million Jews. Under Israeli laws, Eichmann was therefore guilty of murder and genocide even if he had not been physically present during the commission of the acts. [28: See note 25 above.] [29: Ibid., 252-268.]
These documents revealed that after the German military annexed Western Poland in September of 1939 the systematic persecution of Jewish residents began.[footnoteRef:30] Synagogues and Jewish schools were burned and homes vandalized. Roving gangs beat Jews in the streets and robbed them of their valuables. The Jewish population of Jaroslav was drowned in the River San. The Jewish populations of Bromberg and Lodz were massacred and Orthodox Jews had their beards torn out along with skin. Others were captured and placed into forced labor camps. [30: Ibid.]
Just three weeks after the invasion of Poland, Hitler ordered the territories in Poland that were formerly German provinces resettled with Germans.[footnoteRef:31] to make room for the influx of German settlers, all Jews and some Poles were to be expelled from this territory. Thus began the removal of nearly a half million Jews and poles during the winter, after they were stripped of all their valuables. The task for accomplishing this was given to Eichmann and countless died along the transport routes. [31: Ibid.]
The occupied territory within Poland designated to receive these refugees was governed by a long-time Nazi Party member Hans Frank.[footnoteRef:32] the documents presented before the Eichmann court in Jerusalem contained the minutes of a meeting in which Frank remarked that train load after train load arrived with thousands upon thousands of frozen corpses. Governor Frank was actually upset, not because he cared about the inhumane conditions and treatment of the refugees, but because he believed the refugees could have been used for forced labor. He remarked upon this in his personal journal after receiving an order to remove all Jews from the labor camps and munitions factories and...
The question then becomes, not is there an Adolf Eichmann in each person, for undoubtedly there is. The question becomes, how well can people discern the difference between ideals with which they agree, and those things that are immoral; and perhaps most importantly, how effectively can people decide to do that which is morally correct even when faced with such unpopular consequences as standing out from the crowd and
As one side would see them as an extension of the Nazis, who wanted to destroy Israel at any cost. At the same time, opponents would argue that Israel should be talking and negotiating with their neighbors, to avoid similar kinds of conflicts. This is important, because these views would have an impact upon various military operations and foreign policy actions taken in the future. A good example of
Likewise, the heroes are those who took actions to prevent the amassing of victims. Clearly, the individual Nazis do not fit into this category. (Arendt, 2006: p. 74). Thus, Arendt leaves the question as to whether the individual Nazis were bystanders or murderers. To be a bystander, Arendt argues that the Nazi soldiers would have to be completely free of any act that perpetuated the actions. However, because the Nazis
Ethical egoism unsatisfactory moral theory; important corrective ethics -sacrifice. Briefly relate ethical egoism, defended Ayn Rand, ethics -sacrifice, presented Carol Gilligan's stage moral development. Philosophy commentary 1st thread Conventional morality tends to prioritize self-sacrifice as the ideal, particularly for females. However, the valorization of self-sacrifice can be taken too far -- Gilligan's theory of gender-based moral development seems to suggest that it is 'natural' for girls to prioritize harmony over objective ethical
The Kambanda case would officially begin only three years after the commitment of his crimes. According to a timeline on the trial, "Jean Kambanda is arrested in Nairobi, Kenya on 18th July 1997 and transferred to Arusha, to the International Penal Court for Rwanda on the same day." Thus would begin a remarkable trial, somewhat unprecedented, but arguably driven by the conditions which would be established by the events
Psychology Group Dynamics Two significant topics within the area of social influence include conformity and obedience: Stanley Milgram (1933 -- 1984) and Solomon Asch (1907 -- 1996). Please complete Parts I, II, and III. Conformity According to the experiment, conformity is normally criticized basis of morality. Most human atrocities are categorized as obedience crimes. On the other hand, the experiments clarify that the conformity presents equal problematic issues on efficacy grounds. To achieve success,
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now