Treatment of Africans in World War I Versus World War II
The Treatment that the Africans Received in World War I versus World War II
The First and Second World War had a significant effect on the Africans who took part in them. Africans were subjected to significant suffering that affected their health and health outcomes during and after the world. Significant evidence shows that the Africans Soldiers and other participants of the first and the second World Wars suffered from psychological disorders such as post-traumatic stress disorder after the war. Civil rights bodies played a significant role in ensuring that Africans soldiers received fair treatment from their superior colonies during the World War II. This was not possible in the First World War. The roles of the civil bodies can be easily traced throughout the two wars; hence, the need for its analysis (Gaines 62). This study analyzes two articles trying to create a comparison of the civil rights activities of the World War I and II that fostered the fair treatment the Africans during the wars.
Civil rights and efforts contributed significantly to improving the treatment the Africans received during the World War I and II. Narratives from the civil right bodies during the World War I and II showed that the black veterans' were involved in the activities with the intention of countering the unfair treatment they received during the wars. The black veterans made an intuitive contribution by mobilizing the adoption of strategies that safeguarded the rights of blacks in the war. The black veterans were always among the members considered active in the most of the civil rights organizations where the insurgency was launched. The Africans in the World War one faced significant challenges in the war as compared to those in the World War II. For example, they suffered lack of political recognition of their contribution to the war alongside violation of the fundamental human rights.
However, presence of civil bodies such as NAACP fought for equity among the participants of the World War I. World War II saw a significant boost in the opportunities that were provided to the Africans who took part in the World War II. There was an increase in the human right agencies that fought for the protection of their rights. Multiple efforts such as recognition of their contribution and minimal exposures to traumatic experiences were adopted to ensure their protection (Parker 113).
Gaines (58) recognized that significant variability is traceable in the roles of the human rights bodies in the World War I and II. The First World War was characterized by minimal activity of the black press. The World War II witnessed a significant change, as there was a transformation in the representation of the Africans taking part in the World War For example, the Second World War saw an increase in the black press that offered a forum for the expression of contemporary issues affecting Africans in the War. World War II also witnessed the transformation of civil right efforts with more focus on opposing discrimination of Africans on issues related to housing, working conditions, and post-war recognition.
You’re 80% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.