Narcotics Intelligence
Transnational criminals and organization are active in many parts of the U.S. and they make use of illicit cross-border tunnels, parcel services and other means to unlawfully smuggle and distribute drugs and narcotic substances among the communities.
In addition to causing personal harm to individuals consuming drugs, the activities of the transnational drug cartels often lead to significant amount of violence and crime. These are aspects that are associated with drug trafficking and such consequences have the potential to affect the well-being of citizens as well as the fabric of institutions that govern the country.
There are several strategies to combat this menace and all the strategies depend on intelligence gathering, sharing and effective understanding of the information to execute effective actions.
Some of the strategies that are useful in combating the foreign drug cartels and their impact in the U.S. society include maximizing Federal support for drug law enforcement task forces, sharing and exchanging intelligence on transnational cartels, preventing the use of drug trafficking corridors, covert operations and eavesdropping for information and intelligence gathering and joint functioning of the Federal, state, local and tribal law enforcement agencies. Border security and border intelligence is one of the other ways of preventing illegal drugs and narcotics from entering the U.S. Intelligence over the years has indicated that a significant amount of illegal money and arms are traded from the U.S. with the international drug cartels.
In this study we formulate an intelligence gathering strategy to help formulate an effective plan to stop a drug trafficking organization in Mexico from sending narcotic substances into the U.S.
The Intelligence Collection Strategy
Maximize Federal Support for Drug Law Enforcement Task Forces
It is important to stop the Mexican drug cartels from selling drugs in the U.S. This can be done through increased intelligence of the drug availability and distribution in localities and communities through intelligence gathering. Intelligence requires funding and actual work on the ground is essentially done by local dug law enforcement agencies and local bodies. Information gathering entails source funding as well as funding for operations, which require manpower and logistic support. In this aspect the Federal government should ensure adequate funds reach the local law enforcement agencies so that the process of information and intelligence collection runs unhampered. This intelligence gathering should be concentrated to known influence areas of the Mexican cartel's drug in the U.S. known as the High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA). In 2011, HIDTA funded missions managed to 2942 locally organized drug trafficking organizations in the U.S. and seizures of around $728,753,436 in cash and $210,428,628 in non-cash assets. The responsibility of local level information gathering should be conducted by the Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Forces (OCDETF).
Improve Intelligence Exchange and Information Sharing about Mexico-Based Traffickers
There are a number of organizations that are fighting the war against the Mexican-based drug cartels. Every organization has intelligence of their own and collect intelligence on their own and sometimes in a combined manner. To increase effectiveness of the intelligence gathered by the various anti-drug trafficking agencies, it is critical that the intelligence gathered is shared and exchanged amongst the agencies for better effect and co-ordination. It is often seen that intelligence convergence can help create a complete picture necessary for formulation of strategies for tackling drug distribution locally.
For this purpose, the DHS Homeland Security Information Network (HSIN) can serve as the primary source for storing and sharing of information gathered from intelligence. Some other examples of this are the El Paso Intelligence Center (EPIC) and the OCDETF Fusion Center (OFC).
For tackling the drug cartels of Mexico, information can be gathered from the EPIC Border Fusion Intelligence Section that has a wide data base on this and provides a combined all-source intelligence support to anti-drug trafficking agencies at the Federal level as well as at the state, local and tribal level near and along the U.S.-Mexico border.
The strengths, weaknesses and the capabilities of the Mexican drug cartels to effectively engage in cross border transport of drugs should be prepared from the intelligence gathered and collected together from various agencies.
Gathering of financial intelligence and the illegal transfer of money from the U.S. to the Mexican drug cartels is important. This role needs to be fulfilled by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), an arm of the U.S. Department of the Treasury. This is important as any action stopping the flow of illegal drug related money from the U.S. to the Mexican drug cartels would act as a hindrance to the trade and help reduce...
Controlling Organized Crime Organized crime is a threat that does not only affect the United States and its domestic security and economy, but also the worldwide community. Indeed, with the development of the Internet and new communications technology, it has become very easy for criminals to conduct their activities without being detected. Terrorist attacks such as the events of 9/11/2001 have also created a distraction that allowed organized crime to flourish
Without capable and reliable foreign law enforcement partners, the United States, as well as other countries, will remain vulnerable to criminal groups that conduct activities from countries where law enforcement is weak (Helping the World Combat International Crime (http://usinfo.state.gov/journals/itgic/0801/ijge/gj03.htm)." Four Legal Traditions The Common Legal Tradition The common legal tradition dictates that judges have authority and duty to decide what the law in and what criminal or civil punishment will be when laws
Among them, the article notes that more than half of all executions have occurred in the three states of Texas, Oklahoma and Virginia. This geographical bias, the article notes, is indicative of some degree of inconsistency in a system that determines the right to take the lives of its subjects. Another issue that is even more disturbing is the inherent racial bias that underscores the American judicial system. According
Human smuggling is a huge problem with an obvious domestic impact; the size of illegal immigrant population in the United States demonstrates how pervasive the problem is. However, it is not the size of the problem that is the most alarming; in an age of global terrorism, human smuggling provides a method for terrorists to enter a country undetected. The fact that so many non-terrorists use the same means
Although the transnational public sphere is conceived as an entity without boarders, or that at least stretches boarders, Kohler goes on to argue that this type of public sphere is by default dependent on the national sphere (233). The national and international are directly related through a matrix of power. As the transnational public sphere grows, this puts pressure on the national government's sovereignty. A prime example of this is
Current standards are based on male offenders and viewed as inappropriate for non-violent female offenders, who constitute the majority of incarcerated women. This also explains the rise of imprisonment for economic crimes, which involve a disproportionate number of women. AI also recommended against criminalizing drug-dependent pregnant women, as doing so had driven dependent women underground instead of towards treatment and this reduced access to prenatal care of treatment. Racism
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now