Verified Document

Three Fifths Compromise Term Paper

Fifths Compromise History and Background of the Compromise:

If there was one thing that divided Southern and Northern states sharply during the ratification of constitution and immediately after it, it was none other than the institution of slavery. Slavery was indeed a dark and shameful practice that plagued the history of United States for many decades before it was finally abolished in 1860s. However before this time, South has a strong hold on the practice of slavery and no amount of opposition would deter it from its fixed ways of thinking. Southerners believed that the only way they could possibly have an edge over Northern states was with the help of their affluence, which was basically grounded in their rubber, cotton and other plantations. They needed large armies of slaves to work on these plantations since they were cheap labor and couldn't object to the level of wages.

Sugar plantation is heavily responsible for the growth of slavery on the United States. An ugly practice that began in Portugal spread to whole of Europe before it found its way to the Southern states of America. This was in fact one institution that every person with morals would found repulsive and degrading but since it was economically viable, Southerners were more than glad to have found a cheaper means of raising sugar and becoming economically stronger than their more modern Northern counterparts. This shameful practice continued in the United States without much opposition until the latter half of 1800s when Northerners launched staunch attack against inhumane treatment of slaves. It is important to understand that background of slavery and its practice in the U.S. before we discuss the significances or effects of Three-fifths compromise.

While slaves were definitely treated inhumanly, they did have certain impact on two important historical events, Ratification of constitution and Articles of confederation. Southern states...

In other words, they wanted more representations because they felt they had bigger population ratio. However this was one thing that northern states did not agree with because they knew that higher representation would mean more rights and greater voice in deciding major issues. For this reasons, North raised a voice against counting of slaves in the general population and felt that South must not be allowed to count slaves with whites because that would tilt the balance in the latter's favor. Northerners were not in favor of counting slaves because they knew slaves had not been given any rights in the South and thus using them to gain heavier representation was unfair.
The Three fifth - Compromise:

Representation in the House of Representatives was indeed a serious issue during the days of ratification of constitution. Founding fathers wanted torn keep the union together at all costs and they took some wrong decisions to appease the Southern representatives who would have otherwise seceded from the Union. When representation became an important issue, Virginia Plan was proposed which said that states should gain representation on the basis of population. However this plan was not acceptable to the smaller states that felt Virginia plan was both unfair and lopsided as it was give bigger states greater say in all major matters, leaving smaller states in a state of helplessness. Smaller states therefore decided to support New Jersey Plan that proposed equal representation for all states. This plan disregarded the role of population but since South states were not in favor of such method of representation, three-fifth compromise materialized. James Wilson proposed this compromise. He felt that if delegates of various states accepted this proposition, it could solve the problem of counting and representation based…

Sources used in this document:
References

Ward Connerly Don't Box Me In: An end to racial check-offs April 16, 2001

John Burl Smith, The Constitution: T.H.I.N.C. About It! The DISH Volume 2 Number 37. September 24, 1999

Gilder Lehrman Document Number: GLC 80: The Three-Fifth Compromise
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Three-Fifths Compromise and Slavery at Constitutional Convention...
Words: 622 Length: 2 Document Type: Term Paper

In Article 1, Section 9 of the Constitution, Congress was limited from prohibiting the importation of slaves, at least until 1808. For twenty years, Congress was, by virtue of the Constitution, enjoined from any attempt to limit slave importation. Finally, however, Congress did pass a law outlawing the slave trade as of January 1, 1808. The final mention of slavery in the Constitution virtually prevented slaves from gaining freedom by

Slavery in America -- Three Compromises, All
Words: 965 Length: 3 Document Type: Term Paper

Slavery in America -- Three Compromises, All Compromised Wrong -- the Three-Fifths Compromise, the Missouri Compromise of 1820, and the Compromise of 1850 "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men were created equal" -- except for Black American men, of course, who are only 3/5ths equal, according to the Constitution of the United States. The ringing words about equality, penned by Jefferson, a guilty-minded slaveholder sound far less

The Great Compromise the Virginia and New Jersey Plans
Words: 666 Length: 2 Document Type: Essay

Virginia Plan, the New Jersey Plan, the Great Compromise, and the Three-Fifths Compromise lead our current form of Congress? 300 words The Virginia Plan, the New Jersey and Plan and the Great Compromise all essentially contributed to the way in which Congress is today by setting the parameters of representation. The Virginia Plan was put forward by John Adams and basically urged that Congress should consists of representatives that were

Slavery the Founding Fathers of
Words: 1145 Length: 3 Document Type: Term Paper

The relevant portion of the Article specified that "Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States" by adding free Persons to three fifths of "all other Persons" (meaning slaves). The immediate effect of compromise increased the seats of the Southern states from 38% in the Continental Congress to 45% in the first U.S. Congress; it also helped to elect slave-owning presidents in 12 of the first

Inductive Argument Analysis Original Argument:
Words: 1740 Length: 6 Document Type: Essay

It might be said that, had Lincoln not been elected, the war might have been put off by a few years, and then a solution might perhaps have been reached. However, as has been demonstrated, the country was moving inexorably toward war and no other solution would work. If the war had been put off by a few years, the result would more than likely have been even more terrible

United States Constitution, the Articles of Confederation,
Words: 1261 Length: 3 Document Type: Term Paper

United States Constitution, the Articles of Confederation, the Declaration of Independence, and the Great Compromise The Articles of Confederation was the first document attempting to govern how the newly independent states were to act together in their union. However, the Articles of Confederation had significant flaws that rendered them an unrealistic tool for the government of the new states. While not all inclusive, the following are some of the weaknesses

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now