Verified Document

Thomas Hobbes And John Locke Thesis

Thomas Hobbes and John Locke were English social contract theorists who produced books approximately 100 years before the American Revolution describing why men enter political society and what shape the resulting state ought to take. Because of their insistence that the state ought to be justified (or else dissolved) according to whether it satisfied the principles for which it had originally been established, they were highly influential among the founding fathers in America, who made appeal to the writings of Hobbes and Locke to argue that the English sovereign had crossed the lines limiting its authority in the colonies, thereby justifying their overthrowing of that sovereign in the colonies. They also weighed seriously the writing of the two theorists as they developed the American constitution, so that they could be sure to develop for themselves a government that would be justified according to principles that would be good for the body politic that would live under the constitution.

Both Hobbes and Locke imagined a situation in which man lived in a state of nature before he entered the body politic. Hobbes thought that men were basically ill-tempered and untrustworthy and therefore agreed to give over their rights to a sovereign that would rule them absolutely for their own benefit. He favored a large and powerful government able to enforce its will on subjects, in order to control their natural unruliness. Locke, on the other hand thought men in the state of nature were good, but that due to their need to be secure in their property and to protect themselves from outside forces, they banded together to form a state to benefit themselves individually. He favored a limited government able to protect its citizens which would act otherwise almost entirely on their behalf.

The framers of the constitution argued over these two positions, in an attempt to decide whether men needed more or less rule and how they ought to structure the government in order to achieve the right balance. In the end, they stuck a sort of compromise, making a limited government but building in potentialities for the government to grow if necessary in or to meet the challenges of governing a new nation.

Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now