Religion as a Social Phenomenon
Religion serves both a personal and a political function. As a personal phenomenon, religion can provide psychological and emotional sustenance, mitigate grief, and provide solace in the midst of existential crises. Similarly, religion can help people to resolve complex questions related to the nature of transcendental experiences ranging from love and sexuality to the sublimity of nature. We all have a sense of "wonder" that religion helps address in its own unique language, using rituals, exercises, or symbols (Palmquist). However, the personal dimensions of religion are completely distinct from the social and political dimensions of religion.
As a social phenomenon, religion serves some core purposes including creating and maintaining a community. People who are members of a specific religious community have access to the services and camaraderie of other members of that community. Moreover, religion provides a sense of identity -- not only personal but also collective and cultural identity. Religion also provides a belief system and behavioral codes, therefore religion offers social order in a similar way to the secular legal system. As a social phenomenon, religion is best referred to as "organized religion," as opposed to "spirituality," which refers more generally to the personal dimension of the religious experience.
Ideally, religion serves people and helps them to feel connected to others while also resolving some of the key philosophical questions related to the origin and purpose of human life, what happens after we die, and whether or not there is a "God" and if so, what the nature of that God might be. Unfortunately, organized religion fails to function in a healthy way and has likely caused more problems than it has resolved. Religion creates an us-versus-them mentality, leading to the presumption that other belief systems are inferior and even threatening. Similarly, religion can lead to a sense of false righteousness. Because religion is based on emotionality, its core tenets are not necessarily "true," causing problems related to irrational and illogical thinking and anti-intellectualism.
Yet religion is one of the more interesting and colorful aspects of human culture and society. The great diversity of religions in the world offers the opportunity to appreciate the diversity of the human experience, and religion cannot be separated from culture in most respects. A world without religion is trending, especially in the developed world. As a result, we are witnessing greater homogeneity of culture. For example, language remains the most important element distinguishing the different countries of Europe, whereas in the past religion might have been more of a salient issue. Yet not all homogenization is bad; if global society is shifting away from the patriarchal religious codes of the past to a more egalitarian and forward-thinking future based on fact and not on passing fancy, then the world might indeed become a more peaceful place.
In the United States, as in Europe, humanism has replaced religion. Humanism is, in Smart's view, an "alternative to Christianity," (p. 5). However, the original settlers of the United States from Europe brought a particularly rigid brand of Christianity to the New World, puritanism, and there remains a strong thread of religious fundamentalism in American society. Christian Americans find themselves at odds with an increasingly secular society. While religious freedom remains protected under the law, some fundamentalist Christians seem to prefer weaving their religious beliefs into the law rather than allowing the law to respond to secular humanist concerns. In truth, it does not bother me at all that some people are deeply religious. I do disagree that those religious beliefs have any place in any legislation, whether simple local laws or the federal laws that pertain to all Americans. Some Christians in the United States seem to believe that their nation is a "Christian" one but in fact, it is a secular nation.
Personally I do not understand how secular Americans might have a difficult time electing an atheist to the highest office. The president is not a religious leader; there is no reason why the president should believe in God or be a religious person. I do understand the trepidation to elect an atheist president on a few main levels, though. One is sheer newness. Just as there has never been a female or Jewish president, there has never been an atheist president. People generally fear and resist change, so this might be one reason why it could be hard to elect an atheist president. Second, some Americans might wonder if an atheist president shares their values. Because so many values are predicated on religion, this is an understandable line of...
Religion Is Jesus the Only Savoir? Is Ronald H. Nash's opportunity to develop a passionate and well-developed argument answering yes: yes, Jesus is the only Savoir. However, Nash does not rest on the reader's understanding or experience of faith to make his case. The author takes a different approach, using logic and reason to explain that at least to a believer in Christ, there can be no other paradigm other than
Religion is truly a lived experience. In today's volatile world, with world events hinging on various interpretations of religious texts perhaps more than in any other time in human history save, perhaps, during the Crusades, humanity is increasingly aware that religion is not a stoic object of study. Rather, it is a living breathing force in which we live and which inhabits us, whether we seek it or not. Robert Orsi's
Religion Part Two of Ronald Nash's book Is Jesus the Only Savior? deals with the topic of religious inclusivism. Inclusivists "insist that all people must have a chance to be saved," regardless of their belief in Christ.[footnoteRef:1] Not quite the opposite of exclusivism, inclusivism does allow for the potential ability of non-believers to be saved, but just emphasizes the unlikeliness of that actually occurring.[footnoteRef:2] Kanno presents inclusivism as a view that
(40) The foundation of the story demonstrates the social pull of religion as a way of life, that is inclusive, despite its obvious contradictions to the modern world, belief systems and economy. In a sense the social desire to fit in and be seen as different are met by the acceptance of the church as a lifestyle. According to Durkheim, "Deep down, no religion is false.... Each in its
Race factored in creates a shift in the view which can be correctly applied to that which affects voting and as well globalization has created its' own impact on voting choices made by the American individual. BIBLIOGRAPHY Campbell, David E. (2004). Acts of Faith: Churches and Political Engagement. Political Behavior, 26 (2), 155-180. Clawson, Rosalee a. And Clark, John a. (2003). The Attitudinal Structure of African American Women Party Activists: The Impact of
Religion in Things Fall Apart Chinua Achebe's Things Fall Apart is centrally focused on religion, and the varied ways it can be interpreted and how those interpretations can be acted upon. (MacKenzie 128) Secondary to the Igbo religion, which plays an important role in the everyday lives of African's is the contrasting Christian faith of the missionaries that predate colonial interests. It is to some degree important to stress that colonial
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now